551 results found

1. Separate proton pass from account suspensions

   I am writing to express a concern regarding the current account suspension policy and its impact on Proton Pass users.

   Currently, when the anti-abuse system triggers a suspension, it affects the entire Proton account rather than the specific service involved. This approach presents a significant risk for users who rely on Proton Pass to access essential non-Proton services, such as online banking and government websites. If access to Proton Pass is revoked due to a false positive or an issue related specifically to Proton Mail, users are effectively locked out of their entire digital lives.

   I would like to suggest a more measured approach, such as suspending outgoing email capabilities if spam is suspected, while maintaining access to Proton Pass. Ensuring that password access remains uninterrupted is critical for user security and reliability.

   I hope you will consider implementing a more granular suspension policy to protect users from being completely locked out of their essential non-proton related accounts.

   I am writing to express a concern regarding the current account suspension policy and its impact on Proton Pass users.

   Currently, when the anti-abuse system triggers a suspension, it affects the entire Proton account rather than the specific service involved. This approach presents a significant risk for users who rely on Proton Pass to access essential non-Proton services, such as online banking and government websites. If access to Proton Pass is revoked due to a false positive or an issue related specifically to Proton Mail, users are effectively locked out of their entire digital lives.

   I would like to suggest… more

   2 votes

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Changes to existing features  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

2. Disable autosave on Android

   With the the Proton Pass Android app installed and the autofill option enabled, I keep getting many annoying requests asking me to save entries. This function is called autosave on Android and seems to automatically come once you enable Proton Pass for the system wide autofill.

   For example I use Microsoft Authenticator for enterprise login and I need to enter generated two-digits codes in the MS Authenticator app each time I do a login in my web browser. Pass asks me each time if I want to save these two-digit codes, which wouldn't however make any sense at all since they are random codes generated new for each login process. And there are many other cases where I just don't want to save the code I just entered as a login in Proton Pass. So I would like to have a feature to disable the autosave request and not have the annoying requests anymore

   In general even a binary on/off toggle for autosave would be way better than the current situation. In this case I would just disable the feature, since I don't need it. To make this even more fine-granular, you could provide a blacklist like Bitwarden does, so autosave can be disabled for domains or for apps. In that case it would be important that it's possible to exclude apps like MS Authenticator and not only web URLs.

   With the the Proton Pass Android app installed and the autofill option enabled, I keep getting many annoying requests asking me to save entries. This function is called autosave on Android and seems to automatically come once you enable Proton Pass for the system wide autofill.

   For example I use Microsoft Authenticator for enterprise login and I need to enter generated two-digits codes in the MS Authenticator app each time I do a login in my web browser. Pass asks me each time if I want to save these two-digit codes, which wouldn't however make any sense at all since… more

   4 votes

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Changes to existing features  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

3. Secure Links: Restrict access to specific email addresses with OTP verification

   Currently, Proton Pass Secure Links offer two access controls: expiration date and view count limit. Both are useful, but they share a fundamental weakness — anyone who obtains the link can access the shared item within those constraints.

   Proposed feature:
   Allow senders to restrict a Secure Link to one or more specific email addresses. When a recipient opens the link, they are prompted to enter their email address. If it matches an address on the allowlist, Proton Pass sends a one-time code to that address. Only after successful verification is the item revealed.

   Why this matters:
   This ties access to a verified identity rather than mere possession of the link. In professional contexts — sharing credentials with a client, a contractor, or a specific colleague — it ensures that an accidentally forwarded or intercepted link cannot be used by an unintended party.

   Prior art:
   1Password's "Psst!" item sharing already implements this exact flow. The recipient enters their email, receives a one-time verification code, and only then sees the shared item. This is a proven UX pattern that works well.

   What this is not:
   This is not a request to require recipients to have a Proton account. The whole value of Secure Links is that they work for anyone. Email OTP verification preserves that while adding a meaningful identity check.

   Summary of requested controls (combined):
   - Expiration date (existing)
   - View count limit (existing)
   - Restrict to specific email addresses + OTP verification (requested)

   This would make Proton Pass Secure Links genuinely suitable for professional credential sharing, not just casual personal use.

   Currently, Proton Pass Secure Links offer two access controls: expiration date and view count limit. Both are useful, but they share a fundamental weakness — anyone who obtains the link can access the shared item within those constraints.

   Proposed feature:
   Allow senders to restrict a Secure Link to one or more specific email addresses. When a recipient opens the link, they are prompted to enter their email address. If it matches an address on the allowlist, Proton Pass sends a one-time code to that address. Only after successful verification is the item revealed.

   Why this matters:
   This ties access to… more

   2 votes

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Changes to existing features  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

4. Fix auto fill-in for Schwab logins

   Currently, when you first try to login to Schwab.com, the interface lists username and password fields horizontally. This appears to confuse Proton pass and autofill fails to work.

   7 votes

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   4 comments  ·  Changes to existing features  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

5. Feature Request: Native Support for Proton Pass Extension in Falkon Browser (Linux)

   As you may be aware, the Falkon browser (formerly QupZilla) serves as the default browser alternative to Firefox and Chromium in many modern Linux distributions — particularly those built on the KDE Plasma desktop environment. Falkon's user base is steadily growing and represents a significant group of users who value privacy and the use of free software.

   Currently, however, the integration of Proton Pass in Falkon is not natively supported. This creates a gap in the user experience for this community. My proposal is to leverage the existing architecture of the Firefox extension as a reference to establish direct compatibility for Falkon.

   Technical Rationale and Feasibility:

   WebExtensions Standard: Falkon utilizes QtWebEngine and supports the WebExtensions API. Since the current Proton Pass extension for Firefox already builds upon this standardized framework, the technical portability is high. Rather than a full rewrite, it would likely require primarily adapting the compatibility layer to cover any nuances of the QtWebEngine environment.
   
   Parallel to Firefox: Given that Firefox currently serves as the reference platform for the extension and Falkon meets similar requirements, porting it would be a logical next step in your strategy of cross-platform openness.
   
   User Need: Many Linux users who prefer Falkon find themselves forced to either use a different browser or forgo the convenience of automatic password filling. Native support would significantly improve the usability of Proton Pass in this important niche and strengthen the appeal of your services for Linux purists.
   

   I therefore kindly request that you consider adding this item to the roadmap for future Proton Pass updates. Should direct development not be prioritized at this time, perhaps it could be investigated whether the existing Firefox extension already runs in Falkon without further modifications? Often, compatibility exists even when it is not yet officially listed.

   As you may be aware, the Falkon browser (formerly QupZilla) serves as the default browser alternative to Firefox and Chromium in many modern Linux distributions — particularly those built on the KDE Plasma desktop environment. Falkon's user base is steadily growing and represents a significant group of users who value privacy and the use of free software.

   Currently, however, the integration of Proton Pass in Falkon is not natively supported. This creates a gap in the user experience for this community. My proposal is to leverage the existing architecture of the Firefox extension as a reference to establish direct compatibility… more

   2 votes

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Changes to existing features  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

6. "Create Duplicate" option should create an identical duplicate including attachments

   When creating a duplicate of an entry, it doesn't actually create identically same entry, because it strip off the attachments. I have to manually add each attachment, rename every single attachment once again for duplicated entry. Here's an example use case:
   If I want to share a secure note with some of attachments after months, I wouldn't share the actual entry. Instead I would create an identical duplicate entry and check every field for validity. There are scenarios where I have to remove many fields or attachments from a shared note. In case of sharing password entry, this becomes even more critical.
   I found a duplicate creation feature request, which is marked complete:
   https://protonmail.uservoice.com/forums/953584-proton-pass-authenticator/suggestions/47399006-create-duplicate-entries-in-proton-pass

   Duplication feature is although available, but it requires some major polishing.
   Frankly, I also voted for the "De-Duplication" feature request for unintentional, cluttered, and redundant entries.
   And IMO the fine grain control of this literally duplicating feature is very effective, especially my day to day requirements.

   Thanks

   When creating a duplicate of an entry, it doesn't actually create identically same entry, because it strip off the attachments. I have to manually add each attachment, rename every single attachment once again for duplicated entry. Here's an example use case:
   If I want to share a secure note with some of attachments after months, I wouldn't share the actual entry. Instead I would create an identical duplicate entry and check every field for validity. There are scenarios where I have to remove many fields or attachments from a shared note. In case of sharing password entry, this becomes even… more

   3 votes

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Changes to existing features  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

7. TOTP Secure Enrollment - Generating Secure QR Codes for 2FA

   This could be implemented as a checkbox during 2FA setup as a "Trust this device with QR code?" setting or as an Advanced Security 2FA setup. It would require the authentication device to have an internet connection at the time of setting up.

   While generating QR code for setting up 2FA, instead of sending secret to browser/device that could be copied by malware or other screen-based exploits, secure enrollment creates a single-use QR code with a nonce.
   The nonce QR code would then generate a single-use cryptographically signed digit value that would display in the Authenticator on one device only.
   If another device tries to scan the same code after the digit value has been fetched, it will say expired. If another device fetches the nonce QR digit value before the user can scan it, they will simply get an expired as well, and be able to generate a new QR on the untrusted device.
   Inputting the correct 4 to 6 digit code from the app onto the untrusted device in a box under where the QR was generated would allow the real secret to be securely downloaded via encryption and https on the trusted phone/device that scanned the single-use nonce QR code, without the secret ever showing on the untrusted device or loading into the web browser. Thus, the trusted device with the authenticator is given the true key while the untrusted device doesn't receive one bit of secure information.

   Also leave generating the 20 backup codes as optional too to reduce attack surface of screen-based exploits and potential malware. They could then be generated within the authenticator app at a later time if desired.

   This could be implemented as a checkbox during 2FA setup as a "Trust this device with QR code?" setting or as an Advanced Security 2FA setup. It would require the authentication device to have an internet connection at the time of setting up.

   While generating QR code for setting up 2FA, instead of sending secret to browser/device that could be copied by malware or other screen-based exploits, secure enrollment creates a single-use QR code with a nonce.
   The nonce QR code would then generate a single-use cryptographically signed digit value that would display in the Authenticator on one device only. … more

   2 votes

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   1 comment  ·  Changes to existing features  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

8. PIN or passcode to proton authenticator?

   Implement passcode or touch-id to proton authenticator and pass?

   7 votes

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Changes to existing features  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

9. Generate random Prefix for alias

   When creating a new alias, add the option for generating a random prefix with two random words.Example: sheetspray

   18 votes

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   3 comments  ·  Changes to existing features  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

10. Automatically save URL associated with new item

    When you create a new login for example: Proton Pass currently doesn't save the URL for which you created this login. It also doesn't for aliases. This seems like a massive oversight. If there is a URL available just save it? I have many items I'm not sure what they're for due to this. It would just be one less thing we have to depend on our scattered human brains on.

    2 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Changes to existing features  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

11. Improve text search algorithm

    I have an item with title "x" (for x.com), and when I type "x" in the search bar, the item is very low down the list, when I would expect it to be the first result.

    2 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Changes to existing features  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

12. Reset selected vault when app is closed

    If I select the "Logins" vault then close the app, the "Logins" vault will still be selected. Usually I always have to switch to the "All items" view, which is an extra 2 steps. It would be nice if Proton Pass always started off focused on the "All Items", which would make it easier to search.

    2 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Changes to existing features  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

13. Domain URL matching rules

    Proton pass should have URL matching rules like bitwarden. This makes it easier to handle different usecases.
    For instance, at work I have different usernames/passwords on different subdomains and I would like to be able to limit certain credentials to specific subdomains and have others shared accross multiple subdomains.

    So that would be great to have a diffrent matching rules like:
    - root domain
    - hostname
    - starts with
    - regex
    - exact match
    - ...

    1,846 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Under review  ·  185 comments  ·  Changes to existing features  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

14. https://account.proton.me/login FYQT2B2NQG free original prior activity unlocked: account.proton.me free movie activation +917483899733

    https://account.proton.me/login FYQT2B2NQG free original prior activity unlocked: account.proton.me free movie activation upon login? +917483899733 TTB@NYSE@DEO@39@JamesEarlCarterJr@Jun-18-2026 @19:45

    2 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Changes to existing features  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

15. Add predefined custom items categories (and icons) to the main categories

    It would be very helpful if custom items would show up with their custom categories and icons (e.g. software license, bank account, driver's license, etc.) in the item list (and the filter option), rather than showing up as generic custom items with the generic grey wrench icon.

    3 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Changes to existing features  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

16. Misleading UI: Password field mimics PIN entry

    I noticed some UX friction while setting up a PIN for the Pass app. The initial screen requires an account password for authentication, but the UI is styled to look like a PIN entry field. This leads to confusion, as users may mistakenly try to set their new PIN here instead of verifying their identity. I’d suggest making the distinction between 'Password Verification' and 'PIN Creation' more visually clear.

    Also, PIN and Password inputs are different I know that, but user does not see the PIN input at first so cannot distinct them.

    3 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Changes to existing features  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

17. Move Filter Options to the Main Vault List (Home Tab)

    The Problem:
    Currently, the core functionality to filter vault items (by Logins, Aliases, Notes, etc.) is buried inside the Profile/Settings tab. This placement completely breaks the natural user flow. When looking at the main vault list and trying to quickly find a specific item type, having to switch tabs back and forth just to apply a filter is counterintuitive and unnecessarily time-consuming.

    The Solution:
    Please move the filter options directly to the main list view (the first tab).

    Why it matters:
    Improved UX: Users expect filtering to happen on the same screen where the list is displayed.
    Faster access on mobile: Especially on Android and iOS, reducing the number of taps needed to find an alias or a note on the go makes the app significantly more efficient for daily use.

    The Problem:
    Currently, the core functionality to filter vault items (by Logins, Aliases, Notes, etc.) is buried inside the Profile/Settings tab. This placement completely breaks the natural user flow. When looking at the main vault list and trying to quickly find a specific item type, having to switch tabs back and forth just to apply a filter is counterintuitive and unnecessarily time-consuming.

    The Solution:
    Please move the filter options directly to the main list view (the first tab).

    Why it matters:
    Improved UX: Users expect filtering to happen on the same screen where the list is displayed.
    Faster access on… more

    3 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Changes to existing features  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

18. Export passwords by vault

    Add the ability for a user to export passwords via selecting multiple options, and allowing export of entire vaults. (I.E. Folders / Categories).

    This will make it easier to export only sub parts when you do not want to export the entire password database.

    4 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Changes to existing features  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

19. Feature Request: Option to disable screen capture protection in Proton Authenticator

    From my understanding with the help of AI it seems like the desktop app currently applies WDA_EXCLUDEFROMCAPTURE to its windows, which causes NVIDIA Shadowplay's Desktop Capture mode to shut itself off entirely whenever Proton Authenticator is open not just black out the window, but refuse to record at all.

    This is mild infuriating if I wanna get a clip of something said in a discord with my homies or browsing the web and not being able to desktop capture on NVIDIA Broadcast.

    A "Disable screen capture protection" toggle in Settings would let users opt out of this behaviour.

    This would be useful for streamers and anyone who records their desktop regularly.

    From my understanding with the help of AI it seems like the desktop app currently applies WDA_EXCLUDEFROMCAPTURE to its windows, which causes NVIDIA Shadowplay's Desktop Capture mode to shut itself off entirely whenever Proton Authenticator is open not just black out the window, but refuse to record at all.

    This is mild infuriating if I wanna get a clip of something said in a discord with my homies or browsing the web and not being able to desktop capture on NVIDIA Broadcast.

    A "Disable screen capture protection" toggle in Settings would let users opt out of this behaviour.

    This would… more

    3 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Changes to existing features  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

20. Autofill intelligence and reliability

    The biggest problem that keeps cropping up in user reviews is the unreliability of the autofill feature. Proton Pass often fails to recognize login fields correctly, fills in fields incorrectly, or logs out unexpectedly. Proton needs to make significant improvements in this area. Competitors such as 1Password and Dashlane have developed significantly more sophisticated systems that can easily handle complex forms, multi-step login processes, and unconventional websites. Proton Pass should use machine learning to learn from failed autofill attempts and continuously improve its recognition rate. A fallback mechanism that automatically tries alternative filling methods when problems arise, rather than simply failing, would be particularly important.

    The biggest problem that keeps cropping up in user reviews is the unreliability of the autofill feature. Proton Pass often fails to recognize login fields correctly, fills in fields incorrectly, or logs out unexpectedly. Proton needs to make significant improvements in this area. Competitors such as 1Password and Dashlane have developed significantly more sophisticated systems that can easily handle complex forms, multi-step login processes, and unconventional websites. Proton Pass should use machine learning to learn from failed autofill attempts and continuously improve its recognition rate. A fallback mechanism that automatically tries alternative filling methods when problems arise, rather than simply… more

    5 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Changes to existing features  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating