Skip to content

Anonymous

My feedback

1 result found

  1. 1,062 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    If in the future you will ever treat also phone numbers then I'll immediately switch.
    I live in Europe and in my country phone companies keep sharing data everywhere to any serious or even malicious company to propose fraudulent contracts of any sort.
    The supposedly more serious phone company, to actually really deny the share of your personal data, requires a number of (untold) steps: you have to deactivate consensus from your dashboard, but then you'll discover it's not sufficient so you have to call operators to deactivate other things they only have access to, but then you discover is again not sufficient so you have to contact their privacy department and ask for other operations they only have access to, and then it's still not sufficient and you have to request them instructions to apply the "right to oblivion".
    This is just crazy and 4 layers away from any consensual usage. Meanwhile I receive fraudulent calls where they know full name, home address, job, etc (and also data that ONLY the phone operator can have, that proves to be the source).

    I really hope there will be, one day, a consensual phone operator that cares about privacy just in the way the user expects it... I mean, not even hiding from police investigation or something, but only treating personal data in a consensual way with what the client wants (and so, not sharing with other commercial entities if the client says so).

    Or if not Protonmail, maybe a service suggested/endorsed by Protonmail...

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base