Anonymous
My feedback
2 results found
-
667 votesAnonymous supported this idea ·
An error occurred while saving the comment -
133 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Anonymous commentedThis is really a bug or design flaw, which is that the leftmost column of the Inbox is too narrow to display all but the shortest item names, such as defaults like:
Inbox
Drafts
Sentor even
Folders/Labels
But longer or multi-word Folder or Label names get cut off and are not visible. It is not possible to see the remainder of the word(s).
For example, Folder or Label names like these:
ProtonMail News
ProtonMail Supportare too long to be displayed and get cut off.
With certain words this makes it impossible to see what the actual name is (without hovering over it).
This bug/design flaw also blocks viewing of the message counter that normally shows how many messages are under each folder or label.
This is a serious flaw that significantly degrades usability for longer Folder or Label names.
Hopefully it can be fixed soon :)
Anonymous supported this idea ·
As numerous others have commented, as long as the ability to use or respond to Read Receipts is OPTIONAL why would this present a problem?
Yes, for some privacy is a concern, but certainly not for all users in all instance. Certainly that is not the case if the users have agreed to use Read Receipts, as many do.
The scenario mentioned in the Apr 30, 2015 post by "ADMIN The Team!" seems to present it more as an etiquette issue than a true privacy issue.
And, of course, for those who consider it to be a privacy issue they can choose to simply not use the Read Receipt feature or not respond to Read Receipt requests, etc.
Additional requests for this featured have continued to be posted right up through this very time. But the last comment from "ADMIN The Team!" is way back in Apr 30, 2015.
Another thing to consider is that since that time you have added business features. And, of course, it is VERY common practice to sometimes use Read Receipts for business related email.
If possible, could you please post an update as to whether or not this feature is being considered/re-considered?
Thank you!