Anonymous
My feedback
4 results found
-
15,568 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Anonymous supported this idea · -
165 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Anonymous commentedBad idea. And there was already a topic asking NOT to reuse adresses:
https://protonmail.uservoice.com/forums/284483-feedback/suggestions/8482354-removing-accounts-after-some-time-of-inactivity-an#commentsjust use a private domain for your mails if you have problems with usernames. makes life way easier and doesn't cost that much. (+you don't have to change your adresses when switching the mailprovider) ;)
-
3,596 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Anonymous commentedit´s planned and you could just use signal or threema or wikr... the problem is that there are already a lot of messengers with not many people to use them. and since there are not many people on them, new people won´t use it over whatsapp. more secure messengers won´t fix that problem.
-
18,210 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Anonymous commentedSpideroak. It was even recommended by snowden (2013 or so?)
An error occurred while saving the comment Anonymous commentedi use spideroak. it was recommended by snowden years ago and works fine for sync. it´s also zero-knowledge.
honestly i would it more to see the protonmailteam collaborate with spideroak than creating their own thing... you can´t build the best of every solution, just get someone who is already doing it fine and work with them. :P
the guerrillamail problem would not apply if you likit the feature to custom domains. otherwise this might lead to blocking of the "normal" @protonmail.com adresses...
But i do think that their silence on some features is telling us enough about their modus operandi. well i will definitly switch if that feature and real pgp support aren't added by june when my current plan ends.
i mean how damn hard is it to add this or pgp? protonmail is still a closed system in regards to encrypted email to other users. pity it started really good.