Anonymous
My feedback
3 results found
-
7,692 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment -
3,398 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Anonymous
commented
I would like to downvote this feature. It would be a huge amount of work and it'll never have all the features that everyone wants in a mail client. Protonmail should instead make the bridge free for all users so everyone can use their already developed mail clients that already have the mail features they need.
-
344 votesAnonymous
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment Anonymous
commented
I just paid for protonmail before discovering the lack of ability to disable the spam filter. Luckily it's possible to use a Sieve filter to workaround this brokenness, just move everything it thinks is spam back to inbox:
require ["include", "environment", "variables", "relational", "comparator-i;ascii-numeric", "spamtest", "fileinto"];
if allof (environment :matches "vnd.proton.spam-threshold" "*",
spamtest :value "ge" :comparator "i;ascii-numeric" "${1}")
{
fileinto "Inbox";
}If this wasn't possible I'd definitely be asking for my money back and even if they won't, still would have to find a different mail provider.
Requirement 1 of any mail provider: do not fail to deliver legit mail to my inbox. Or at least if you do, then provide a way of training your shitty spam filter of what looks like spam and what does not look like spam. It should go without saying but whitelisting addresses does not prevent similar looking emails being marked as spam.
I would like to downvote this feature. It would be a huge amount of work and it'll never have all the features that everyone wants in a web browser, and as others have noted, there are already other browsers that implement privacy features. Why are you asking Protonmail to duplicate that work?