It's frustrating that we're voting on this issue again, especially since the previously implemented solution doesn't align with what we initially requested and voted for.
The primary advantage of a password manager is the need to remember only one complex, high-entropy password for future-proofing.
However, the current two-password system not only fails to enhance security but potentially compromises it by encouraging users to create two separate, likely weaker passwords.
Proton has consistently had a willingness to listen to user feedback and implement changes accordingly. It's so weird that this particular issue remains unresolved.
We should have:
A separate, single password for Proton Pass.
The option to disable TOTP in favor of using only security keys.
These basic features should have been addressed long ago and represent the minimum acceptable solution to this problem
Jobber
It's frustrating that we're voting on this issue again, especially since the previously implemented solution doesn't align with what we initially requested and voted for.
The primary advantage of a password manager is the need to remember only one complex, high-entropy password for future-proofing.
However, the current two-password system not only fails to enhance security but potentially compromises it by encouraging users to create two separate, likely weaker passwords.
Proton has consistently had a willingness to listen to user feedback and implement changes accordingly. It's so weird that this particular issue remains unresolved.
We should have:
A separate, single password for Proton Pass.
The option to disable TOTP in favor of using only security keys.
These basic features should have been addressed long ago and represent the minimum acceptable solution to this problem