Aaron B
My feedback
2 results found
-
71 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Aaron B
supported this idea
·
-
794 votesAaron B
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment Aaron B
commented
I'm a Proton Unlimited subscriber, but was a bit surprised when I saw only 500GB of Proton Drive storage included given that there are plenty of other options for secure cloud storage. As much as I have no issue paying a bit more for Proton's services, I also understand that no organization is immune from compromise (see zero-knowledge cloud storage provider "SpiderOak" and their breach earlier this year), not to mention that Proton still has competition in the market despite others believing they are the end-all-be-all for secure services and storage. While Proton is definitely worth paying a bit more money vs. other providers given their consistent updates/product development/overall noticeable dedication to creating the world's best, most secure services (just my opinion), I still don't feel that 500GB of Proton Drive storage space is acceptable for individuals who are paying a premium for the services. Additionally, for individuals such as myself, I have no reason or inclination to pay more for a Family Plan, Visionary Plan, etc. when all ‘m seeking is additional Proton Drive storage space. I do not require access or storage for additional users, etc. considering I’m the one and only user who uses these services. @Proton, would you ever consider increasing the minimum Proton Drive storage space to 1TB for Proton Unlimited Subscribers, while making additional capacity “add-ons” available at reasonable, competitive prices for Unlimited accounts/individual users? I'm happy to be a guinea pig for anything you'd like to beta test, and a huge “thank you” to the Proton team for all of the effort they continue to put forth into their products and services!
The ability to sort a list of contacts seems to be a fundamental feature in any "contacts" functionality regardless of the provider. Proton, in regards to the ease/speed of adding this feature, would you consider this to be "low-hanging fruit" that could quickly and easily be resolved?