Riva Manella
My feedback
4 results found
-
2 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment -
6 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Riva Manella commented
Low-key, the censorship stuff is definitely a real concern, but honestly I think the bigger issue is that a lot of the security tools we're running just aren't built to catch threats that don't look like your textbook attack patterns. A buddy of mine who does AppSec was saying that most of the sketchy activity happens at runtime when the code is actually live, not during static scans or policy checks, and that's where most platforms totally drop the ball. He mentioned that https://raven.io/runtime-adr is one of the few things that actually gives you visibility into what's going down while things are executing, which is exactly where those sneaky exploits like to hide. No silver bullet, but it definitely seems like the kind of direction more tools should be heading, especially with all the censorship noise making it harder to trust what's legit and what's not. Worth keeping on your radar for sure
-
15 votes
-
17 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Riva Manella commented
That's a great feature suggestion. A digital planner with habit tracking integrated into a secure ecosystem like Proton would be incredibly powerful for personal organization. It’s all about creating a single, reliable source of truth for your commitments and goals. This idea of a centralized, authoritative register is just as critical in business. I've found that the same principle applies to managing company assets. When equipment isn't tracked, it leads to the same kind of inefficiency and frustration you're trying to solve with a planner. For anyone looking to bring that order to their physical or IT assets, starting with a proper fixed asset register is the foundational step. I found a very clear, practical guide on exactly how to do that at https://itemit.com/how-to-prepare-a-fixed-asset-register/. It turns chaos into a manageable system, which is ultimately what any good planning tool should do.
I have noticed that with a lot of these privacy-first apps, the security is solid but the UX feels like an afterthought. It is a common tradeoff, but it does not have to be that way. A clean, consistent interface is just as important for trust as the encryption itself. If the app feels clunky, people will not stick around long enough to care about the privacy features. That is where a focus on https://www.neuronux.com/services/uxui-design can make a real difference. Getting those small details right, like button feedback and navigation flow, completely changes how the app feels to use.