SouthernScribbler
My feedback
38 results found
-
590 votes
SouthernScribbler
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment -
44 votes
SouthernScribbler
supported this idea
·
-
45 votes
SouthernScribbler
supported this idea
·
-
47 votes
SouthernScribbler
supported this idea
·
-
67 votes
SouthernScribbler
supported this idea
·
-
73 votes
SouthernScribbler
supported this idea
·
-
77 votes
SouthernScribbler
supported this idea
·
-
77 votes
SouthernScribbler
supported this idea
·
-
82 votes
SouthernScribbler
supported this idea
·
-
97 votes
SouthernScribbler
supported this idea
·
-
10 votes
SouthernScribbler
supported this idea
·
-
5 votes
SouthernScribbler
supported this idea
·
-
6 votes
SouthernScribbler
supported this idea
·
-
4 votes
SouthernScribbler
supported this idea
·
-
4 votes
SouthernScribbler
supported this idea
·
-
15 votes
SouthernScribbler
supported this idea
·
-
8 votes
SouthernScribbler
supported this idea
·
-
6 votes
SouthernScribbler
supported this idea
·
-
6 votes
SouthernScribbler
supported this idea
·
-
4 votes
SouthernScribbler
supported this idea
·
Interesting reading this thread — Memory did ship with Lumo v2.0, yet the recent comments show people still hitting its limits. I suspect what's really being asked for isn't memory itself, but control over it.
Two things struck me:
To those wary of quiet accumulation — fair concern. The answer isn't "there are controls"; it's opting out per-conversation, not just globally.
To those wanting segregated directories or juggling Project files — you're both describing the same thing: user-controlled memory compartments.
So I've posted a formal suggestion that bridges both — a "New Private Chat" option (no memory in, no memory out, with clear indicators) plus memory "containers" that don't bleed into each other:
https://protonmail.uservoice.com/forums/932842-lumo/suggestions/51658933-title-per-conversation-memory-control-new-priv
Full details are there — would love votes/thoughts if it resonates. Judging by the recent comments here, the conversation is already heading this way.