I don't understand why the maximum number of labels is so small. An infinite number is absurd, of course, but the current maximum sure comes as an unpleasant surprise...as of today. Why not have, e.g., 100 labels free and charge for the next 100? I like to organize my emails and the current maximum forces me to go to GMAIL OR OUTLOOK!! I had no idea there was a maximum and will have to forward all those that do not fit under a specific label to GMAIL OR OUTLOOK.
If increasing the number of labels is off the table, why not a warning that there is currently a maximum number of emails obviating the shock of a low current maximum?
I don't understand why the maximum number of labels is so small. An infinite number is absurd, of course, but the current maximum sure comes as an unpleasant surprise...as of today. Why not have, e.g., 100 labels free and charge for the next 100? I like to organize my emails and the current maximum forces me to go to GMAIL OR OUTLOOK!! I had no idea there was a maximum and will have to forward all those that do not fit under a specific label to GMAIL OR OUTLOOK.
If increasing the number of labels is off the table, why not a warning that there is currently a maximum number of emails obviating the shock of a low current maximum?