why not, don't forget firefox but maybe dangerous with the fingerprinting, no ?

Just use split tunneling ?

What benefit does having a ProtonVPN Extension have on top of the native desktop app?

Yep please ;) For Chrome first

Firefox browser yup

I am assuming the folks here are asking if ProtonVPN could be enabled on a per process (per tab or per site basis). If so, the technology that would ostensibly be used is a proxy server.

The problem with proxy servers use is that proxy servers work at the application protocol level (usually http, https). Proton would then need to implement encryption for all protocols that could conceivably be used. This is non-trivial and resource intensive.

Easier to encrypt the traffic _en toto_ than to encrypt traffic piece meal. It's a nice idea though.

A better approach would be split tunneling on an application basis.

The least extensions, the better.
Security is of the utmost.

run

rum

I would love if Brave could use ProtonVPN as a built-in

Como puedo y de dónde una extensión de protón VPN? Sería lo más!!!

I would love this (Firefox).

I'm running a server on my desktop that accepts incoming connections, but I would like to browse securely.

I think this would be perfect for a 4k TV to protect the streaming

Browser VPN extensions can be pretty useless in certain scenarios. I don't see why this would ever be better than a desktop solution...

Need this

Please make this happen

Must have feature for a VPN

Agreed. This needs to happen. I'm already on ProtonPlus, but I won't upgrade to have the VPN, because they don't have the browser extension. I will likely have to go with someone who does have it.

Yes, I hope there are extensions on chrome store/firefox

Great !