Ease up on the censorship within Lumo
I am an AI enthusiast and engineer. I am not kidding when I say I have not been able to prompt Lumo ONE SINGLE TIME without it saying that it cannot help with whatever I am prompting it for.
If you EVER want to sell this to ANYONE (especially if you ever want to sell the API), you probably aught to take the route that Venice AI is taking and make it an uncensored (or less censored) model. I genuinely could mention something loosely interpret-able as criminal, and it wouldn't even bother to try and reason whether it is safe or not to answer to.
In its current state, it's an entirely useless proposition as it is a subintelligent model who is even further restricted than Gemini et al.
Privacy --> Lack of Censorship, generally.
****, I asked it to help me with a cybersecurity question which could be interpreted as helpful to society and would have minimal harm, and it just decided to block me entirely.
If you wanted to REALLY innovate in the privacy scene, offer a full cloud option where users can host their own uncensored text, image and video models or something of the sort.
SIDENOTE: why proton meet b4 proton spreadsheets (and all other office features)??? I've paid for Visionary since it came out and I do love Proton but wtf