Title: Project Threads Lack Clear Memory Architecture—Choose Privacy OR Context, Not Neither
Category: General Ideas / Lumo

The Current Problem:

Lumo's v2.0 persistent memory aggregates content from general chat threads—but excludes project threads from memory aggregation. However, project threads remain indexed and searchable by keyword within the account.

This creates a contradictory state with no tangible benefit:

No context continuity — When you mention a project topic in a general chat, Lumo doesn't know the project exists or have any history to reference
No real privacy — Project content is still searchable/indexed, so it's not a true "black box"
No security gain — A snooper with account access can find project content via search; a locked memory system wouldn't add protection

Current State:

Projects: NOT aggregated → memory = incomplete
Projects: Still indexed → search = works
Result: Worst of both worlds (loss of convenience, no privacy benefit)

Proposed Solutions (Either/Or):

Option A: True Private Project Mode

Project threads are fully gated—requires PIN/code entry to access
Content excluded from both memory and search indexing
Opt-in only (user explicitly locks a project)
For sensitive work that needs genuine isolation

Option B: Full Memory Aggregation

Project threads feed into Lumo's persistent memory like general chats
Content indexed and searchable (current behavior)
Cross-thread context works seamlessly
For users who prioritize functionality over isolation

Option C: Hybrid Approach (Recommended)

Default: Project threads aggregate to memory AND indexed
User can enable "PIN Lock" on specific projects
Locked projects: Excluded from memory, excluded from search
Requires authentication to view or discuss locked project content
Dual-memory system: General memory + Project-only memory (accessible after PIN unlock)

Why This Matters:

Users managing multiple projects (business startup, technical documentation, etc.) need consistency. If project threads are meant to be private, make them private. If they're meant to support context continuity, let them aggregate.

The current halfway measure provides neither benefit.

Requested Action: Implement gatekeeping (PIN/code) for project threads with dedicated project memory upon unlock. Give users explicit control over whether their project content feeds into general memory or stays isolated.