216 results found

1. Downloadable document generation

   I noticed Lumo AI lacks on document generation. No option to generate downloadable document such as text, pdf, markdown, excel, powerpoint, open document, etc. I suggest this should be available as it is a norm/standard feature of an AI.

   3 votes

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Changes to existing features  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

2. Lumo payment separate from my other products

   Currently, to sign up for Lumo+, you must add it to your current subscription, with the same time period, so if you have a 1-year subscription, you have to pay for 1 year of Lumo, if you have a 2-year subscription, you have to pay for 2 years of Lumo up front.

   The other option is to lose all the discounts on your main Proton account in order to activate Lumo+ for the new term.

   For example, if you have a 2-year Duo subscription (€11.99 per month) and you only want 1 month of Lumo for both users, you have to switch to the monthly price, which increases the price to €45.97. This is more expensive than Visionary!

   Lumo needs to have a separate billing option. Or fix the prices, because I will never subscribe this way. And I want to support it.

   Currently, to sign up for Lumo+, you must add it to your current subscription, with the same time period, so if you have a 1-year subscription, you have to pay for 1 year of Lumo, if you have a 2-year subscription, you have to pay for 2 years of Lumo up front.

   The other option is to lose all the discounts on your main Proton account in order to activate Lumo+ for the new term.

   For example, if you have a 2-year Duo subscription (€11.99 per month) and you only want 1 month of Lumo for both users, you have… more

   25 votes

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   4 comments  ·  Changes to existing features  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

3. Lumo Green Ads Position Paper.pdf (or .txt.docx)

   Title: Integrate Green Contextual Advertising to Expand Lumo Free Tier

   Description:

   Problem: Lumo's subscription-only model limits free tier generosity (7-day chat history, 100 queries/week), restricting adoption to a privacy-conscious niche rather than building the mass user base needed to challenge US AI dominance.

   Proposal: Implement "Lumo Green Ads" — contextual advertising from EU-certified green companies, using the EU's September 2026 Empowering Consumers for the Green Transition Directive (Directive 2024/825/EU) as regulatory foundation.

   Benefits:

   Enables expanded free tier (300-500 queries/week, 30-90 day history) for users opting into ads
   Preserves privacy principles: no behavioral tracking, no profiling, on-device content classification only
   Creates competitive differentiation that US competitors cannot credibly match
   Aligns with EU policy coherence (Green Deal + Digital Strategy + AI Act)
   Generates supplementary revenue while expanding accessibility to broader user base
   Technical Feasibility: Privacy-preserving contextual advertising frameworks already exist (TCF 2.2 compliance, on-device keyword extraction, TEE-based processing). No third-party tracking, cookies, or cross-site profiling required.

   Model: Contextual, not behavioral. Ads matched to query content. Certified advertisers only (ISO 14067 or EU Ecolabel required). User opts in for expanded free tier; opt-out preserves current experience.

   Implementation: Phased rollout — pilot with 10-20 certified advertisers in Germany/Netherlands (strong green consumerism markets), expand to 100+ across EU within 12 months.

   Revenue Estimate: At €3-8 CPM for contextual green ads with 2-5M free users, generates supplementary income to subsidize expanded free tier features.

   Strategic Significance: Addresses core tension between values-driven positioning and growth imperatives needed for geopolitical influence. The September 2026 directive enforcement creates a first-mover window before US competitors can adapt.

   Full position paper available at: [https://drive.proton.me/urls/J1G5RW6CK8#23WYG1nUYEhj]

   Title: Integrate Green Contextual Advertising to Expand Lumo Free Tier

   Description:

   Problem: Lumo's subscription-only model limits free tier generosity (7-day chat history, 100 queries/week), restricting adoption to a privacy-conscious niche rather than building the mass user base needed to challenge US AI dominance.

   Proposal: Implement "Lumo Green Ads" — contextual advertising from EU-certified green companies, using the EU's September 2026 Empowering Consumers for the Green Transition Directive (Directive 2024/825/EU) as regulatory foundation.

   Benefits:

   Enables expanded free tier (300-500 queries/week, 30-90 day history) for users opting into ads
   Preserves privacy principles: no behavioral tracking, no profiling, on-device content classification only
   Creates… more

   3 votes

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Changes to existing features  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

4. Proper Lumo mobile apps

   Lumo needs a proper app. Every other Proton app is designed to integrate into their respective systems, but Proton Lumo is just a web app, and it works just as well as any web app, which means not as well as it should. Lumo needs more love in this department, a proper mobile app.

   8 votes

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Changes to existing features  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

5. Enhance Lumo with Dedicated First-Level Support Training & Automatic Knowledge Updates

   Perhaps it's a generally silly idea, but I often try Lumo as the first point of contact for support regarding Proton products. While the AI assistant delivers good to excellent results in many areas of knowledge, it surprisingly seems to be weak in this area, and I have already had to contend with some misinformation. Therefore, I propose extending Lumo’s capabilities to serve as a reliable, up-to-date first-line support agent. The core idea is to provide Lumo with a focused training set, encompassing, among other things, Proton-specific FAQs, troubleshooting guides, and policy documents, combined with an automated pipeline that feeds the latest developer releases and support team updates directly into the model. Why it matters: Users get instant answers without waiting for a ticket, and routine queries are handled by Lumo, freeing the live support team to focus on complex or security-critical cases.

   Perhaps it's a generally silly idea, but I often try Lumo as the first point of contact for support regarding Proton products. While the AI assistant delivers good to excellent results in many areas of knowledge, it surprisingly seems to be weak in this area, and I have already had to contend with some misinformation. Therefore, I propose extending Lumo’s capabilities to serve as a reliable, up-to-date first-line support agent. The core idea is to provide Lumo with a focused training set, encompassing, among other things, Proton-specific FAQs, troubleshooting guides, and policy documents, combined with an automated pipeline that feeds… more

   6 votes

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   7 comments  ·  Changes to existing features  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

6. Customizable start screen

   A way to set the default screen when you first open the app to the screen/ side bar where it shows the projects and in progress/ history of chats. most of the time when i open the app thats the first screen i go to, and it's a bit of a pain to have to click up in the top left corner just to get started, i prefer to be able to scroll through the last time i used lumo, or be able to jump right back to key points, or go to my projects. It would simplify my workflow if i could have the option to set it to have that sidebar screen as the main start screen. Or a customizable start screen that you could have include different features that you use the most.

   A way to set the default screen when you first open the app to the screen/ side bar where it shows the projects and in progress/ history of chats. most of the time when i open the app thats the first screen i go to, and it's a bit of a pain to have to click up in the top left corner just to get started, i prefer to be able to scroll through the last time i used lumo, or be able to jump right back to key points, or go to my projects. It would simplify my workflow… more

   3 votes

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Changes to existing features  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

7. More General Transparency

   As privacy is a main concern for most of your users I wish for more transparency for everything Lumo.

   What models get used for the answer, what server did handle my input/output. For the server it would be good to know which location.

   If asked directly I need Lumo to be honest about its own architecture and what model is used.

   Also more openeness about decision making. Like honesty about what pieces of information came from training data and what came from a websearch. I had instances of specifics after Lumo did a websearch that were clearly not taken from any of the shown webresults and so must come from training data or hallucination.

   Also generally I would prefer fully open source models being used.

   As privacy is a main concern for most of your users I wish for more transparency for everything Lumo.

   What models get used for the answer, what server did handle my input/output. For the server it would be good to know which location.

   If asked directly I need Lumo to be honest about its own architecture and what model is used.

   Also more openeness about decision making. Like honesty about what pieces of information came from training data and what came from a websearch. I had instances of specifics after Lumo did a websearch that were clearly not taken from… more

   5 votes

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Changes to existing features  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

8. Lumo "lite" tier for Unlimited, Duo and Family subscribers

   While I get the cost of hosting an LLM and a separate plan for unlimited usage is totally fair, I do think paying customers, especially subscribers to the so-called unlimited plans, should get a little special treatment with a tier of Lumo exclusive to these plans.

   Perhaps instead of the 10/day and 200/month prompt limit, 1 project limit and 7 day history that Lumo Free provides, this new Lumo Lite could give us 50/day, 500/month, 2 projects and unlimited history (we already have 500 GB of storage so Lumo message storage should be negligible).

   All the other features like unlimited prompts, projects and advanced AI models could be reserved for the Plus plan for those who need it, but having it easier to integrate in an existing 2 year plan, with appropriate discounts would be nice. Currently, upgrading to Lumo Plus while having Proton Unlimited, downgrades me to a 1 year plan for both, forcing me to pay more for Proton Unlimited as well.

   While I get the cost of hosting an LLM and a separate plan for unlimited usage is totally fair, I do think paying customers, especially subscribers to the so-called unlimited plans, should get a little special treatment with a tier of Lumo exclusive to these plans.

   Perhaps instead of the 10/day and 200/month prompt limit, 1 project limit and 7 day history that Lumo Free provides, this new Lumo Lite could give us 50/day, 500/month, 2 projects and unlimited history (we already have 500 GB of storage so Lumo message storage should be negligible).

   All the other features like unlimited… more

   4 votes

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   1 comment  ·  Changes to existing features  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

9. Allow Users to Manually Pin Items to Persistent Memory

   Title: Allow Users to Manually Pin Items to Persistent Memory (URLs, References, Project Links)

   Category: General Ideas / Lumo

   Lumo's persistent memory is a powerful feature, but users currently have no direct control over what gets retained versus what fades between sessions. Memory aggregation appears to use opaque heuristics—frequently discussed topics and user facts tend to persist, while specific URLs, project links, and one-time references often do not.

   This creates a recurring problem: users who share important links, reference documentation, or UserVoice post URLs in one thread return in a new thread to find that context is gone. The only workaround is manually re-sharing the same information every time.

   Proposed Feature:

   Add a "Pin to Memory" function that allows users to explicitly mark specific content for permanent retention across all sessions.

   Examples of what users would pin:

   URLs to UserVoice posts they want to track
   Links to external documentation or references used repeatedly
   Project file locations or external resource links
   Specific facts or preferences that the current heuristic-based memory might miss
   Recurring account details (e.g., plan tier, timezone, preferred tools)
   

   How It Would Work:

   User highlights or flags content within a conversation (e.g., right-click → "Pin to Memory," or a simple command)
   Pinned items appear in a Memory Management panel under Settings
   Users can review, edit, and delete pinned items at any time
   Pinned items persist across all threads—including project threads
   Pinned items are clearly labeled as user-added (distinct from auto-aggregated memory)
   

   Why This Matters:

   Current memory behavior is inconsistent and unpredictable. Users cannot rely on it for specific references. Giving users explicit control over what persists would:

   Eliminate the need to re-share links and context in every new thread
   Build trust in the memory system (users know what's saved because they chose it)
   Reduce friction for users managing multiple ongoing projects
   Complement the existing auto-aggregation with intentional, user-curated memory
   

   The current system remembers some things and forgets others with no transparency. A user-controlled pinning layer would solve this without requiring a full redesign of the underlying memory architecture.

   Title: Allow Users to Manually Pin Items to Persistent Memory (URLs, References, Project Links)

   Category: General Ideas / Lumo

   Lumo's persistent memory is a powerful feature, but users currently have no direct control over what gets retained versus what fades between sessions. Memory aggregation appears to use opaque heuristics—frequently discussed topics and user facts tend to persist, while specific URLs, project links, and one-time references often do not.

   This creates a recurring problem: users who share important links, reference documentation, or UserVoice post URLs in one thread return in a new thread to find that context is gone. The only… more

   3 votes

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Changes to existing features  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

10. Project Threads Lack Clear Memory Architecture

    Title: Project Threads Lack Clear Memory Architecture—Choose Privacy OR Context, Not Neither
    Category: General Ideas / Lumo

    The Current Problem:

    Lumo's v2.0 persistent memory aggregates content from general chat threads—but excludes project threads from memory aggregation. However, project threads remain indexed and searchable by keyword within the account.

    This creates a contradictory state with no tangible benefit:

    No context continuity — When you mention a project topic in a general chat, Lumo doesn't know the project exists or have any history to reference
    No real privacy — Project content is still searchable/indexed, so it's not a true "black box"
    No security gain — A snooper with account access can find project content via search; a locked memory system wouldn't add protection
    

    Current State:

    Projects: NOT aggregated → memory = incomplete
    Projects: Still indexed → search = works
    Result: Worst of both worlds (loss of convenience, no privacy benefit)
    

    Proposed Solutions (Either/Or):

    Option A: True Private Project Mode

    Project threads are fully gated—requires PIN/code entry to access
    Content excluded from both memory and search indexing
    Opt-in only (user explicitly locks a project)
    For sensitive work that needs genuine isolation
    

    Option B: Full Memory Aggregation

    Project threads feed into Lumo's persistent memory like general chats
    Content indexed and searchable (current behavior)
    Cross-thread context works seamlessly
    For users who prioritize functionality over isolation
    

    Option C: Hybrid Approach (Recommended)

    Default: Project threads aggregate to memory AND indexed
    User can enable "PIN Lock" on specific projects
    Locked projects: Excluded from memory, excluded from search
    Requires authentication to view or discuss locked project content
    Dual-memory system: General memory + Project-only memory (accessible after PIN unlock)
    

    Why This Matters:

    Users managing multiple projects (business startup, technical documentation, etc.) need consistency. If project threads are meant to be private, make them private. If they're meant to support context continuity, let them aggregate.

    The current halfway measure provides neither benefit.

    Requested Action: Implement gatekeeping (PIN/code) for project threads with dedicated project memory upon unlock. Give users explicit control over whether their project content feeds into general memory or stays isolated.

    Title: Project Threads Lack Clear Memory Architecture—Choose Privacy OR Context, Not Neither
    Category: General Ideas / Lumo

    The Current Problem:

    Lumo's v2.0 persistent memory aggregates content from general chat threads—but excludes project threads from memory aggregation. However, project threads remain indexed and searchable by keyword within the account.

    This creates a contradictory state with no tangible benefit:

    No context continuity — When you mention a project topic in a general chat, Lumo doesn't know the project exists or have any history to reference
    No real privacy — Project content is still searchable/indexed, so it's not a true "black box"
    No

    … more
    3 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Changes to existing features  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

11. Ability to check updated files from Proton Drive

    When I upload a file to Lumo from Proton Drive, Lumo makes a suggestion to change something in the file. A word file for instance. I do the changes and want Lumo to check it again. But a file that has been once uploaded to Lumo cannot be "updated" it can be uploaded and then it is locked in practice. I need to rename the file if I want lumo to see the new version. My proposal is that once I have updated a file on Proton Drive that I have a possibility to remove the old version from the Lumo Chat and start fresh with the new version of the file. Alternatively, just with one button "replace old version" that makes it easier to work with updated files. On another note, when the file names are not very short, selecting a file from proton drive for lumo is a bit of a guess work. The possibility to have a larger field for selection of proton drive, maybe even on a separate window including change date or file size would be helpful.

    When I upload a file to Lumo from Proton Drive, Lumo makes a suggestion to change something in the file. A word file for instance. I do the changes and want Lumo to check it again. But a file that has been once uploaded to Lumo cannot be "updated" it can be uploaded and then it is locked in practice. I need to rename the file if I want lumo to see the new version. My proposal is that once I have updated a file on Proton Drive that I have a possibility to remove the old version from the… more

    3 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Changes to existing features  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

12. Lumo - think before you write

    Recently Lumo has started interrupting itself mid-answer saying "Wait..." then correcting, sometimes totally negating, the part of the answer it already gave you, which you may have spent time reading and digesting which then becomes a total waste of your time.
    
    Have Lumo not start writing until it has its total best answer. It's plenty fast enough and now that you're displaying its "thinking" process we're not worried that it's stalled.
    Or if you prefer, make this a checkbox we can choose, or a retained setting if we're signed in.

    5 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Changes to existing features  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

13. Add support for de-googled devices

    Lumo is unsupported without Google Play Services. Can't start the application, blocked during boot.
    Using LineageOS. Should work without Google.

    24 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Changes to existing features  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

14. Train Lumo to understand the user interface

    Lumo doesn't understand how to communicate through the User Interface very well. It should be trained. Lumo said that the character limit for a single response was about 4000 to 6000 characters. It should know the actual number and be able to feedback to the user that the limit was hit instead of indicating that it will try to better next time (it won't, the UI has a hard limit). When trying to get Lumo to format a list, it is like working with a teenager, it doesn't do what you want and says it will try to better next time. The problem is that it doesn't understand how the user interface interprets things like linefeed vs carriage return. If they Lumo and the UI both used a common format like Rich Text Format, it would cut the conversation requests way down.

    Lumo doesn't understand how to communicate through the User Interface very well. It should be trained. Lumo said that the character limit for a single response was about 4000 to 6000 characters. It should know the actual number and be able to feedback to the user that the limit was hit instead of indicating that it will try to better next time (it won't, the UI has a hard limit). When trying to get Lumo to format a list, it is like working with a teenager, it doesn't do what you want and says it will try to better next… more

    4 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Changes to existing features  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

15. Sort chat history by last activity

    Description:
    Lumo’s chat history currently appears to keep conversations sorted by their original creation date instead of their most recent activity.

    This creates a significant usability problem when reusing older conversations. If I open an old chat and continue using it, the conversation does not move back to the top of the history. It stays buried in the same old position, even though it has just become active again.

    This is especially inconvenient for long-running conversations. For example, I may have a chat created weeks or months ago that I still use regularly for the same topic, project, research thread, troubleshooting case, or personal workflow. Even after sending a new message in that chat, it remains far down in the history list.

    Expected behavior:

    When a conversation receives a new message, either from the user or from Lumo, it should move back to the top of the history. The history should be sorted by last activity, not only by the original creation date.

    Current behavior:

    Old conversations seem to remain sorted according to when they were first created. Reusing a conversation does not make it appear as a recent chat.

    Why this matters:

    This makes the history harder to use as the number of chats increases. A conversation that is still active and relevant can remain hidden far down the list simply because it was created a long time ago.

    The current behavior also goes against what users normally expect from chat applications, messaging apps, email threads, and productivity tools. In most interfaces, a recently active conversation is shown near the top, regardless of when it was originally created.

    Practical impact:

    Users may need to scroll through a long history to find conversations they are actively using.

    Important ongoing conversations become harder to resume.

    Users may create duplicate chats just to keep important topics visible, which makes the history more cluttered.

    The “history” view becomes less useful because it does not reflect what has actually been used recently.

    This is particularly annoying for people who use Lumo for ongoing technical work, long-term research, recurring questions, project notes, or conversations that naturally continue over time.

    Suggested improvement:

    Please sort chat history by a “last activity” or “last updated” timestamp.

    A chat should move to the top when:

    The user sends a new message in that conversation.

    Lumo replies in that conversation.

    The conversation is resumed or updated.

    Optional improvement:

    It would also be useful to display the last activity date or time in the history list, so users can clearly understand why a conversation appears where it does.

    Possible sorting options could include:

    Sort by last activity

    Sort by creation date

    Sort alphabetically

    Pinned or favorite chats first

    But the default behavior should probably be sorting by last activity, because that is the standard and expected behavior for a chat history.

    Description:
    Lumo’s chat history currently appears to keep conversations sorted by their original creation date instead of their most recent activity.

    This creates a significant usability problem when reusing older conversations. If I open an old chat and continue using it, the conversation does not move back to the top of the history. It stays buried in the same old position, even though it has just become active again.

    This is especially inconvenient for long-running conversations. For example, I may have a chat created weeks or months ago that I still use regularly for the same topic, project, research thread,… more

    4 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Changes to existing features  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

16. Delete images independently

    It would be good to be able to delete images from the Images section independently of the chat/conversation they were created by - especially when created within a project where it only seems to be removed when the entire project is deleted.

    3 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Changes to existing features  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

17. Project Knowledge Preview adjustable width on lumo.proton.me

    Right now when I preview project knowledge in Lumo on lumo.proton.me, the preview shows up in a side bar. However, the side bar can't be adjusted in width. With the project folder in full screen on most monitors, there is a LOT of extra real-estate. I'd be nice if the frame used to display this preview was adjustable in width so I could use that free real-estate.

    3 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Changes to existing features  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

18. Confirm Add Visual Confirmation When Copying Response Text

    Currently, when clicking the Copy button (located next to the 👍/👎 reaction buttons at the end of each response), there's no visual feedback confirming the action was successful. Users sometimes navigate away to paste and discover nothing copied to their clipboard.
    Requested Solution: Add a brief visual confirmation after clicking Copy, such as:
    * A "Copied!" toast/snackbar message that appears for 2–3 seconds
    * Button text temporarily changing to "✓ Copied"
    * Subtle animation or color change on the button itself
    User Impact: This would eliminate confusion, reduce frustration, and build trust in the feature—especially helpful for users relying on copying responses regularly. It's a small UX polish that would make a noticeable difference

    Currently, when clicking the Copy button (located next to the 👍/👎 reaction buttons at the end of each response), there's no visual feedback confirming the action was successful. Users sometimes navigate away to paste and discover nothing copied to their clipboard.
    Requested Solution: Add a brief visual confirmation after clicking Copy, such as:
    * A "Copied!" toast/snackbar message that appears for 2–3 seconds
    * Button text temporarily changing to "✓ Copied"
    * Subtle animation or color change on the button itself
    User Impact: This would eliminate confusion, reduce frustration, and build trust in the feature—especially helpful for users relying on… more

    3 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Changes to existing features  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

19. Implement Bias Mitigation for Chinese Open-Weight Models (Qwen, Kimi K2)

    As noted in Lumo's Privacy Documentation, the system currently routes queries to several open-weight models, including Qwen and Kimi K2. While utilizing these models supports cost-efficiency and open-source diversity, research (e.g., NDSS 2026, "S1761") indicates they contain significant internal censorship and narrative engineering aligned with authoritarian state interests.

    Proton’s core mission is to champion digital rights, encryption, and freedom against state surveillance. However, deploying models with embedded propaganda or censorship mechanisms creates a contradiction:

    • Cognitive Risk: Users may receive subtly altered information or suppressed viewpoints on sensitive geopolitical topics (e.g., HK, Taiwan, human rights).
    • Value Misalignment: This conflicts with Proton's historical stance supporting activists and resisting authoritarian control.

    Proton should implement a bias mitigation layer specifically for these models. This could involve:

    • Post-Training Alignment: Applying techniques similar to those discussed in ACL 2023 ("Mitigating Bias in Large Language Models") to strip state-aligned censorship.
    • Routing Logic: Automatically routing sensitive queries (political, human rights, censorship-related) to models with stronger neutrality guarantees (e.g., Apertus, Llama variants) or applying strict red-teaming filters.
    • Transparency: Clearly labeling when a response originates from a model known to have censorship constraints.

    Why This Matters: For a privacy-first platform serving a global audience, the integrity of the information provided is as critical as the encryption of the channel. Mitigating these biases ensures Lumo remains a tool for liberation rather than an unwitting vector for state narratives.

    As noted in Lumo's Privacy Documentation, the system currently routes queries to several open-weight models, including Qwen and Kimi K2. While utilizing these models supports cost-efficiency and open-source diversity, research (e.g., NDSS 2026, "S1761") indicates they contain significant internal censorship and narrative engineering aligned with authoritarian state interests.

    Proton’s core mission is to champion digital rights, encryption, and freedom against state surveillance. However, deploying models with embedded propaganda or censorship mechanisms creates a contradiction:

    • Cognitive Risk: Users may receive subtly altered information or suppressed viewpoints on sensitive geopolitical topics (e.g., HK, Taiwan, human rights).
    • Value Misalignment: This conflicts with Proton's… more
    5 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Changes to existing features  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

20. Option turn off anthropomorphic thinking and text

    I am currently very ritated

    why? I am wasting time, energy, and most of all TOKENS because of lumo's anthropomorphic beheviour.

    I understand people love anthropomorphic AIs.

    Can we however have an option to turn if off?

    And i really really really hope i do not need to explain what anthropomorphic in Ais means.

    because i my suggestion is NEXT LEVEL

    as in thinking and the text.

    Lumo keeps repeating the same answers, or otherwise, without thinking even when explicitly told to stop.

    when it finally stops to thinking, more then half of the "thinking" are simple anthropomorphic related text.

    Oh User is frustrated because i did this and i should have not. I need to make sure i apologies to user. I need to make sure i acknolage. I need to this. I need to do that. <- absolutly NONE of them are relevant to the task. and albsolutly ALL of them occure each time Lumo finally thinks.

    We are wasting most of out time, energy, and resources, because of this anthropomorphic elements in an AI.

    or what, is it a crime, heath risk, fraud, abuse, something? that an ais is not constanly determin how to "not offend" someone who is explicitly telling it to stop with this commenteries about what it did, what it did wrong, apologies, acknolagements, what it will do, as in reassurances, and ..... Did i make it clear? ALL of this, even if they are NOT in the output, they are if you simple check the thinking. And this happens alll the time. Insted of Lumo chekcing the tast, or instructions, or otherwise, it preocupised with anthropomorphic beheviour.

    For proton: I hope you understand that I am not talking about preferences but about the fact that a paid product is wasting time, mental energy, is getting absurd for not reason, it's producing text that is unsolicited, unproductive, ilogical at time AND it is PREVENTING anything to progress:

    You are right, i should have not, i will from now

    Here is again what i just wrote because I run out of tokens or time to actually proccess the task

    I am currently very ritated

    why? I am wasting time, energy, and most of all TOKENS because of lumo's anthropomorphic beheviour.

    I understand people love anthropomorphic AIs.

    Can we however have an option to turn if off?

    And i really really really hope i do not need to explain what anthropomorphic in Ais means.

    because i my suggestion is NEXT LEVEL

    as in thinking and the text.

    Lumo keeps repeating the same answers, or otherwise, without thinking even when explicitly told to stop.

    when it finally stops to thinking, more then half of the "thinking" are simple anthropomorphic related text.

    … more

    3 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Changes to existing features  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating