Julien
My feedback
3 results found
-
313 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Julien supported this idea · -
3,478 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Julien commentedThis is critical!
Julien supported this idea · -
129 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Julien commentedYes please!
The only other alternative is the NAT-PMP feature. It works but it's really tricky... One needs to make the application send port forwarding requests to the VPN gateway and not the normal one (eg. home router).
The NAT-PMP RFC clearly states that it is not designed for that:
Clients always send their NAT-PMP requests to their default gateway,
as learned via DHCP [RFC2131], or similar means. This protocol is
designed for small home networks, with a single logical link (subnet)
where the client's default gateway is also the NAT for that network.
For more complicated networks where the NAT is some device other than
the client's default gateway, this protocol is not appropriate.Julien supported this idea ·
How can this be missing since 2017 seriously