Josh w/ Tech Grips
My feedback
10 results found
-
423 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment -
822 votesJosh w/ Tech Grips
supported this idea
·
-
1,061 votesJosh w/ Tech Grips
supported this idea
·
-
212 votesJosh w/ Tech Grips
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment Josh w/ Tech Grips
commented
Seriously? Other more established calendar applications don't even do anything like that. I'm sure the developers have many other actual value-adding features to consider before this exorbitant 'nice-to-have'.
-
129 votesJosh w/ Tech Grips
supported this idea
·
-
1,151 votesJosh w/ Tech Grips
supported this idea
·
-
991 votesJosh w/ Tech Grips
supported this idea
·
-
930 votesJosh w/ Tech Grips
supported this idea
·
-
366 votesJosh w/ Tech Grips
supported this idea
·
-
372 votesJosh w/ Tech Grips
supported this idea
·
There is nothing “sane, superior” about the year being the first thing you see when ascertaining a date for something... It's unnecessary and bloat! Obviously everyone knows what the current year is, that's why the **actual** sane, superior, internationally standardized format is MM/DD/YYYY. If you're looking at any date you intuitively need to know what month and day the event or appointment is, with a confirmation of the year at the end. That's why the month first, followed by the day, ending with the year is the best format. This is also closest to the natural way you'd speak it... So I think that forever and always settles this nonsensical debate...