Josh w/ Tech Grips
My feedback
10 results found
-
443 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment -
908 votesJosh w/ Tech Grips
supported this idea
·
-
1,114 votesJosh w/ Tech Grips
supported this idea
·
-
223 votesJosh w/ Tech Grips
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment Josh w/ Tech Grips
commented
Seriously? Other more established calendar applications don't even do anything like that. I'm sure the developers have many other actual value-adding features to consider before this exorbitant 'nice-to-have'.
-
157 votesJosh w/ Tech Grips
supported this idea
·
-
1,228 votesJosh w/ Tech Grips
supported this idea
·
-
1,060 votesJosh w/ Tech Grips
supported this idea
·
-
973 votesJosh w/ Tech Grips
supported this idea
·
-
373 votesJosh w/ Tech Grips
supported this idea
·
-
377 votesJosh w/ Tech Grips
supported this idea
·
There is nothing “sane, superior” about the year being the first thing you see when ascertaining a date for something... It's unnecessary and bloat! Obviously everyone knows what the current year is, that's why the **actual** sane, superior, internationally standardized format is MM/DD/YYYY. If you're looking at any date you intuitively need to know what month and day the event or appointment is, with a confirmation of the year at the end. That's why the month first, followed by the day, ending with the year is the best format. This is also closest to the natural way you'd speak it... So I think that forever and always settles this nonsensical debate...