Skip to content

John Doe

My feedback

34 results found

  1. 591 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    John Doe commented  · 

    "Proton Chat" sounds appealing on paper, but I think it misses how messenger apps actually succeed. Strong encryption isn't really a selling point anymore. It's just expected. And Signal already nails security better than anyone, so that bar is pretty high.

    What actually matters is whether your friends are on it, and whether it does everything you need. The market's already crowded with Telegram, Signal, Threema, and WhatsApp, all with huge user bases that took years to build. Proton would have a hard time getting enough people on board, and you'd end up with a technically solid app that nobody you know actually uses.

  2. 191 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    John Doe commented  · 

    Strong support for this feature!

    Encrypted DNS (DoH / DoQ) would be especially valuable when using Quad9, which I am already using anyway. Native support in the macOS and iOS apps would greatly improve usability and ensure DNS privacy truly aligns with Proton’s privacy-by-default approach.

    John Doe supported this idea  · 
  3. 4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    John Doe shared this idea  · 
  4. 13 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    John Doe supported this idea  · 
  5. 12 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    John Doe shared this idea  · 
  6. 6 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    John Doe shared this idea  · 
  7. 19 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    John Doe shared this idea  · 
  8. 103 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    John Doe supported this idea  · 
  9. 45 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    John Doe shared this idea  · 
  10. 12 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    John Doe supported this idea  · 
  11. 5 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    John Doe shared this idea  · 
  12. 800 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    John Doe supported this idea  · 
  13. 818 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    John Doe commented  · 

    I strongly support this feature request.

    Shared folders that other Proton users have shared with me are currently not visible in the Proton desktop app on macOS, which is a major usability gap compared to the web and mobile apps.

    This is especially problematic because many shared folders contain files that are primarily or exclusively used in desktop workflows (e.g. Photoshop files, thesis documents, design assets, large PDFs, project folders). These files are often irrelevant or impractical to work with on mobile and significantly harder to manage through the web interface compared to a native desktop app.

    The inconsistency between platforms breaks real-world usage:
    - Shared folders are accessible on web/mobile
    - But invisible in the macOS desktop app
    - This forces users to constantly switch platforms just to access shared content

    For a desktop app, visibility and full parity with shared folders is essential, not optional. Without it, the macOS app cannot realistically replace the web app for collaborative or academic/professional use cases.

    Adding full support for viewing and accessing shared folders in the macOS desktop app would greatly improve usability, platform consistency, and trust in the desktop client as a primary tool.

    Just do it like Dropbox, please.

    John Doe supported this idea  · 
  14. 97 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    John Doe commented  · 

    I strongly support this feature request. It also applies to the iOS Proton Mail app by the way!

    The current UX/UI for handling multiple Proton Mail accounts in the macOS desktop app is frankly very poor. Having to click the user icon, select another account, and then wait for a full reload just to check whether there are unread emails is far too many steps for a basic, high-frequency action.

    There is no at-a-glance overview of unread emails across accounts, which makes managing multiple inboxes unnecessarily slow and frustrating. Compared to Apple Mail and other native macOS mail clients, this feels like a significant usability regression rather than a limitation.

    A persistent sidebar with all accounts and unread indicators is not a “nice to have” — it’s essential for anyone using more than one Proton Mail account. The current approach breaks workflow, adds cognitive load, and does not scale beyond a single account.

    This feature would dramatically improve productivity and bring the macOS app in line with established desktop mail UX expectations.

    John Doe supported this idea  · 
2 Next →