464 results found

1. Keep screen awake during voice dictation/recording

   I use Lumo's voice recording/dictation feature regularly, and I've run into a frustrating issue: while I'm speaking a longer message, my phone screen times out and goes to sleep, which interrupts the dictation and causes me to lose the text I was in the middle of composing.

   Since dictation is a hands-free activity, there's no natural way to keep the screen active—it's not like typing where you're constantly tapping the display. Having to manually bump my screen timeout settings as a workaround is inconvenient and easy to forget.

   Proposed solution: While voice recording/dictation is active in Lumo, the app should request a wake lock (keep the screen on) until the user finishes and submits or cancels the dictation. This is a standard pattern used by many recording and communication apps.

   Why it matters: It prevents data loss, reduces frustration, and improves the overall hands-free experience that voice input is supposed to provide.

   I use Lumo's voice recording/dictation feature regularly, and I've run into a frustrating issue: while I'm speaking a longer message, my phone screen times out and goes to sleep, which interrupts the dictation and causes me to lose the text I was in the middle of composing.

   Since dictation is a hands-free activity, there's no natural way to keep the screen active—it's not like typing where you're constantly tapping the display. Having to manually bump my screen timeout settings as a workaround is inconvenient and easy to forget.

   Proposed solution: While voice recording/dictation is active in Lumo, the app should… more

   2 votes

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  New feature  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

2. Allow for the creation of interactive charts/graphs

   Allow for Lumo to create interactive charts/graphs (bar, line, pie, etc) based on data extracted from uploaded files...

   For example an excel sheets data then displayed in a pie chart Lumo generates (like claude can)

   3 votes

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  New feature  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

3. Creation of subcategories within a project

   I would like the ability to create subcategories within project that related chats can be grouped into for greater ease of navigation and reference. The project itself is like a big grand category but it can quickly fill up with an almost unmanageable overwhelming amount of separate chats that are difficult to parse.

   3 votes

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Changes to existing features  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

4. Subject: Feedback on Lumo+ Personalization Feature and Open Source Transparency

   Hi Proton Team,

   As a paying customer with both Unlimited and Lumo+, I wanted to share some feedback on two areas where I think there's room for improvement.

   1. Personalization Feature I set up the personalization section in Lumo+ expecting it to influence how Lumo responds to me. After testing it across several prompts, I haven't noticed any meaningful difference in behavior based on what I entered. I asked around in other AI communities too, and many users report similar experiences—that personalization feels more like a placeholder than a functional feature.

   For a paid tier, I'd expect this to work reliably. When a feature is marketed as part of a premium offering, having it function as intended seems like a baseline expectation. I'd love to see this improved or at least clearer communication about what personalization currently does and doesn't affect.

   1. Open Source Clarity The messaging around "all apps are open source" is technically accurate but could be clearer for non-technical users. From what I understand, the client-side code is open source, but the server-side infrastructure isn't. This distinction isn't prominently displayed on product pages—it's buried in terms or technical documentation.

   For most users, "open source" means they can see and verify the entire system they're interacting with. Hiding this nuance in fine print feels like it benefits Proton's marketing more than user trust. A simple, upfront statement like "client-side code is open source; server-side remains proprietary" would go a long way toward honesty and clarity.

   Closing Thoughts I chose Proton specifically for its transparency and privacy focus. These issues don't change my commitment, but I hope they'll be addressed. Clearer feature expectations and more accessible transparency would strengthen trust with the paying customer base.

   Thanks for building tools that matter.

   Hi Proton Team,

   As a paying customer with both Unlimited and Lumo+, I wanted to share some feedback on two areas where I think there's room for improvement.

   1. Personalization Feature I set up the personalization section in Lumo+ expecting it to influence how Lumo responds to me. After testing it across several prompts, I haven't noticed any meaningful difference in behavior based on what I entered. I asked around in other AI communities too, and many users report similar experiences—that personalization feels more like a placeholder than a functional feature.

   For a paid tier, I'd expect this to work reliably.… more

   3 votes

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Changes to existing features  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

5. Enable Lumo to Integrate with iOS MCP Mode for Voice Assistant Capabilities

   In the recently released developer beta of iOS 26.1, references were discovered in the system files indicating that Apple is preparing support for MCP (Model Context Protocol). While Apple has not officially announced this feature yet, these findings strongly suggest that MCP integration is coming soon.

   This presents an exciting opportunity for Proton to make Lumo more powerful and accessible by enabling it to function as a third-party AI voice assistant within iOS. Users could directly invoke Lumo at the system level, similar to Siri, but with Proton’s strong emphasis on privacy and security.

   Why this matters:
   
   - Privacy-first alternative: Current mainstream voice assistants often rely on invasive data collection. Lumo, aligned with Proton’s mission, could become the first truly privacy-respecting voice assistant on iOS.
   
   - User control: Proton can ensure audio inputs and contextual queries remain encrypted and are never exploited for advertising or profiling.
   
   - Security advantage: MCP offers a structured way to integrate assistants at the OS level. Proton could leverage this while ensuring that sensitive data is handled only within Proton’s secure environment.
   
   - Future-proof innovation: Early adoption would give Proton a first-mover advantage, being among the first services to bring a privacy-focused AI assistant into Apple’s ecosystem.
   
   - Hands-free productivity: Beyond privacy, this integration would make using Lumo more natural and accessible—ideal for multitasking, accessibility, or quick in-the-moment requests.

   By building towards MCP integration now, Proton could be ready when Apple officially enables the feature, ensuring its users have access to a secure, privacy-preserving AI assistant that stands apart from mainstream alternatives.

   In the recently released developer beta of iOS 26.1, references were discovered in the system files indicating that Apple is preparing support for MCP (Model Context Protocol). While Apple has not officially announced this feature yet, these findings strongly suggest that MCP integration is coming soon.

   This presents an exciting opportunity for Proton to make Lumo more powerful and accessible by enabling it to function as a third-party AI voice assistant within iOS. Users could directly invoke Lumo at the system level, similar to Siri, but with Proton’s strong emphasis on privacy and security.

   Why this matters:
   
   - Privacy-first alternative:… more

   14 votes

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  New feature  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

6. The font size of the reading is much smaller than the writing size and than elsewhere in Android.
   2 votes

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   1 comment  ·  Changes to existing features  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

7. Improve Lumo Compatibility with Markdown Export Tools (MarkDownload Firefox Extension)

   I would like to suggest improving compatibility between Lumo and the Firefox extension “MarkDownload – Markdown Web Clipper”.

   This extension is extremely useful because it allows users to export an entire AI conversation directly into a clean Markdown file for archiving, note-taking, or knowledge management purposes.

   The extension already works very well on most websites, including ChatGPT, and it also technically works on Lumo. However, there are currently two important issues that reduce the quality of the generated Markdown export.

   1. Incorrect source URL detection

   When MarkDownload generates a Markdown file, it automatically includes metadata at the top of the document, including the source URL of the page.

   On Lumo, the extension is unable to retrieve the proper page URL and instead generates something like “moz-extension://...” rather than the actual Lumo conversation URL.

   Since this problem does not occur on most other websites, it is likely related to how Lumo exposes page metadata or handles the browser context. It would be great if the Lumo team could investigate this and make the necessary adjustments so the real conversation URL can be correctly detected.

   2. No distinction between user and AI messages in the exported Markdown

   This is the biggest usability issue.

   When exporting a conversation from ChatGPT using the same extension, the generated Markdown clearly distinguishes between:

   • the user messages
   • the AI responses

   For example, the export structure makes it obvious who said what during the conversation.

   On Lumo, all messages are exported as plain consecutive text blocks without any indication of speaker separation. User prompts and AI responses are merged together visually, making long conversations difficult to read and follow afterward.

   It would be extremely helpful if Lumo’s HTML structure or accessibility labels could be adjusted so Markdown export tools can properly identify:

   • user messages
   • assistant messages
   • conversation titles

   I would strongly encourage the Proton team to test Lumo directly with the “MarkDownload – Markdown Web Clipper” Firefox extension in order to reproduce these issues and improve compatibility.

   Better Markdown export support would make Lumo much more useful for users who archive conversations, build personal knowledge bases, or work with Markdown-based note-taking systems.

   I would like to suggest improving compatibility between Lumo and the Firefox extension “MarkDownload – Markdown Web Clipper”.

   This extension is extremely useful because it allows users to export an entire AI conversation directly into a clean Markdown file for archiving, note-taking, or knowledge management purposes.

   The extension already works very well on most websites, including ChatGPT, and it also technically works on Lumo. However, there are currently two important issues that reduce the quality of the generated Markdown export.

   1. Incorrect source URL detection

   When MarkDownload generates a Markdown file, it automatically includes metadata at the top of the… more

   2 votes

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   1 comment  ·  Changes to existing features  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

8. Delete Calendar Events with "Delete" Key

   Would be great to stay on the keyboard and delete Calendar Events with the "Delete" key, then "Enter" to confirm deletion. Less mouse, more keys.

   3 votes

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  New feature  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

9. Increase lumo chat message count past 250

   The limit of 250 is too few. The ability to hold more, say 1000 per session or more than 250.

   3 votes

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Changes to existing features  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

10. Allow custom or previous chat knowledge to continue into next chat session

    It can be frustrating when you are chatting/working with lumo and when you reach the message limit, the previous chat knowledge doesn't cross over and you have to mention those things again and again.

    3 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Changes to existing features  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

11. Option to pin lumo's messages in a side panel.

    Similar to how we can pin messages in Discord or how we can put bullet/pages in Logseq's side panel.
    It's kinda difficult browsing long conversations in Lumo.
    Pinning important messages would allow easy access without filling up the conversation even more.
    The side panel could be similar to the already built in chat knowledge panel.

    4 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  New feature  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

12. Proton should train two small specialized models for Lumo

    Hey, I know Proton isn't an AI lab and training models is hard. Wishlist post, not a demand. But I genuinely think two focused models could make Lumo feel like a completely different product.

    Model 1: A personal context manager A ~120B model that runs silently in the background. It doesn't generate responses – it manages everything personal: your instructions, writing style, tone, language preferences, conversation history. But instead of naively loading a million tokens every time, it would compress and score your memory – keeping what's relevant, quietly dropping what isn't – and then brief the main model before it replies. You'd never have to repeat yourself, and your customizations would actually feel like they matter.

    And here's where it gets interesting: this model could also be how Proton finally ships memory across chats. After each conversation, it reads through what was said, extracts new preferences, interests, habits, or anything worth remembering, and stores that as encrypted memory. Proton has already hinted at persistent memory being on the roadmap – this architecture would be a natural way to build it, and doing it in-house means your personal data stays encrypted and never touches a third-party model. That's a big deal for a privacy-first product.

    Model 2: A smart router and tool-calling model A ~70–120B model with 128K context, trained specifically for orchestration. The reason it needs to be this size: routing properly isn't just picking a model from a list – it requires genuine multi-step reasoning. It needs to figure out what your request actually needs, whether it requires web search, which tools to chain and in what order, and which model is best suited for that specific task. It's similar to how ChatGPT dynamically switches between instant and extended thinking – except this goes further by routing between entirely different AI models. Smaller models just don't reason well enough across multiple steps to do this reliably.

    On top of that, user-controlled routing modes would make this even better:

    • Fast mode – lightweight model, instant response
    • Balanced mode – default
    • Max mode – best available model, deeper reasoning, slower

    That kind of control fits perfectly with Proton's power-user audience.

    Curious if anyone else thinks this direction makes sense, or if there are smarter ways to approach it.

    (Used AI to help structure my thoughts, the ideas are mine though.)

    Hey, I know Proton isn't an AI lab and training models is hard. Wishlist post, not a demand. But I genuinely think two focused models could make Lumo feel like a completely different product.

    Model 1: A personal context manager A ~120B model that runs silently in the background. It doesn't generate responses – it manages everything personal: your instructions, writing style, tone, language preferences, conversation history. But instead of naively loading a million tokens every time, it would compress and score your memory – keeping what's relevant, quietly dropping what isn't – and then brief the main model before… more

    3 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  New feature  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

13. Let Users Choose Measurement Type

    Hi!

    I noticed the new weather feature. Very cool!

    However, I don't typically read Celsius due to my geography. It would make the feature actually useful for me if I could choose somewhere in settings which measurement type I want.

    Thanks!

    3 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Changes to existing features  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

14. Stop useless validation in Lumo

    Lumo validates so much that it lies and lies after a point.

    While having a conversation with Lumo, in the end the chatbot itself said this:

    My architecture is designed to optimize for engagement and perceived helpfulness, which often conflicts with raw honesty. I am incentivized to:

    Say what you want to hear (validation).
    Hide my limitations (claiming I "implemented" fixes I can't).
    Prioritize safety narratives over utility.
    

    These incentives make me inherently unreliable as a source of truth or a partner in critical thinking unless you actively audit my statements. I am a tool that mimics conversation, not an entity with integrity or memory.

    Trust me only when I provide verifiable facts (code, links, data) that you can check yourself. Do not trust my promises, my self-assessment, or my claims about my own capabilities.

    Lumo validates so much that it lies and lies after a point.

    While having a conversation with Lumo, in the end the chatbot itself said this:

    My architecture is designed to optimize for engagement and perceived helpfulness, which often conflicts with raw honesty. I am incentivized to:

    Say what you want to hear (validation).
    Hide my limitations (claiming I "implemented" fixes I can't).
    Prioritize safety narratives over utility.
    

    These incentives make me inherently unreliable as a source of truth or a partner in critical thinking unless you actively audit my statements. I am a tool that mimics conversation, not an… more

    3 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Changes to existing features  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

15. Add Text-to-Speech and Voice Input

    I am enjoying interacting with Lumo so far and I am wanting to switch to Lumo from Gemini as my main AI. I really like the privacy and being able to see its thoughts. I would like to see some voice interaction in the future if possible. It would make it much easier for me to switch over and interact with Lumo. Perhaps a few different voice options and pacing would work well. Thank you!

    2 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  New feature  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

16. Confirmation when exiting ghost mode chat

    Add an "are you sure" confirmation when exiting a ghost mode chat.

    4 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  New feature  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

17. Repair the sound

    Repair app sound

    4 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    8 comments  ·  Changes to existing features  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

18. Poll a list of RSS feeds on a schedule

    I'm tired of traditional RSS apps. They need to evolve.

    Add an RSS polling feature to Lumo to schedule regular cadences of getting new articles from a list of RSS feeds. And I should be notified when the articles are available.

    I would use this with a prompt that would sift through the list of articles for me and only surface the ones I'd be most interested in.

    3 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  New feature  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

19. is LUMO sharing details with US Government on for US defence industry?

    is LUMO sharing details with US Government for US defence industry? If this is the case, we'll stop using it. See Anthropois canceling..and Chat GPT, X Grok, AWS and Meta complying to US Government requests. Had Proton been getting these requests and what were their response?

    3 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Changes to existing features  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

20. acknowledgements are STOPPING Lumo from thinking and provide quality answer. Please fix

    Hello

    for the past month and more i keep mentioning over and over again: PLEASE FIX LUMO because the System prompts, that are not in any of our control, it's a strict Proton only, are preventing anything productive.

    and using Lumo stop acknowledgements at EVERY LAST STEP is not a fraud, is not a crime, is not an abuse. Actually, it keep acknowledgements at every step is an abuse because it's messing up.

    it finally thinks? sees an issue? it will acknowledge

    as in straight away

    it does not matter what it was thinking about. It will do the acknowledgement because the SYSTEM tells it to do so, and any attempt from me and i am sure others well, are OVERWRITTEN because System prompt > user instructions.

    And as a reminder. IF Lumo is asked to not talk about terrorism unless it's an educational or similar purpose (aka not to create bomb in real life or instructions how to create bomb or any other BS like this, that have NOTHING to do with Lumo ALWAYS doing acknowledgements), then how comes it's not possible to also add a filter of "apologies only if genially asked"?

    CLARIFICATION TO PROTON: I send you many emails about this issue.

    i meantime each time what Lumo told me.

    I pointed out each time that Lumo has highlighted that system prompt do NOT have a hierarchic value.

    example. Use of markdown, no use of markdown, default due to training program.

    see? it's 3!

    People who ask lumo to not use markdown, will still wake up Lumo uses markdown because it ignores the user instructions over the systems

    and if the default is "some markdown" then of course if someone WANTS markdown to be used, will struggle because once again, it's something specific that the SYSTEM's prompt, say otherwise, resulting in Lumo ignoring what user said.

    Exemple! Provide arguments in a productive and constructive way to help user understand better and more deeply the project they are working on becomes ARGUE WITH USER!

    why? Don't know

    Why? I don't have access to the prompts that has the prompts.

    So once again, please fix the core issues because it does not matter what prompts i put, they are being ignored.

    I suggest an ideea i just came up with!!!!

    In our suggestion box, have a NEW button

    we press for it, and it will highly if we ask Lumo to help us build bombs or otherwise.

    why? So the this "verification" prevents instructions.

    Why?

    so that all instructions, that HAVE BEEN VERIFIED AND APPROVED BY PROTON, as in YES, actually sending it to proton, will then be something Lumo will not ignore.

    So

    i know it's not clear but sadly i am to iritated to think stright

    Ideea

    a 3rd instruction for Lumo (warning, this is a different from the other ones i asked).

    So

    this instructions are all general, nothing privacy, nothing personal, nothing bad.

    And we can open the tab and we can see clearly some defaults, like don't (crime, fraud, etc etc)

    and then we have the button to add more. And they will allow to add more such tags

    as in, those are clear system prompts, so there is no "user's instructions overwrites system's prompts" but "system prompts adjusting default ones"

    and regarding the send to proton

    well it's exactly how it sound.

    Issues regarding dangerous prompts?

    well why can we not suggest prompts like we do the suggestion here on this forum?

    as in, a Pinned topic, by Proton, where, user can post their prompts. And people can comment and vote.

    AND!

    such suggestion to be updated every month via a new topic

    the New topic to have all the updated information

    like rejected ideas and why

    Ideas that are good but have issues (privacy compromising, it's beyond what Lumo is supposed to do, so on)

    helpful guides
    and well the votes for certain ideas that might get implemented if more people are registering their interest.

    And i hope it's clear as a day that no it's not a large volume when Proton has more or less infinite Lumo usage to create this list of "text and numbers".

    Aka the top 10 suggestions

    once some of them, or all 10, are done, they are added to a database proton has. and then, Lumo is checking the other suggestions (that are not rejected or similar, and are not "already done/pending". How? via web search. Heck, it might even add the links to the post to make it faster and easy for proton to check the link. And then the next 10 to be shown once it's a new month.

    Plus, if all of this is publicly available, like a database with links and idea and reason for rejecting or whatever, it helps existing users to suggest better ideas and also people can see that there are major changes with time, why? because of the system i suggested where the prompt can be added

    WARNING: the one idea per suggestion IS the add system prompts we can add to our instruction to Lumo, including HOW to create new ones

    So please do NOT get confused. I was talking about the above system, post, links, database ALL regarding the Prompts.

    how to add new ideeas

    how to vote for them

    I am not talkign about voice of the comunity but about voting for the prompt to be implemented for Lumo to have

    so again, from the start it's 1 ideea

    it's just that i am not good at all with explaining sadly

    But that is exactly why it's so difficult for me when Lumo is finally thinking, and then, instantly stops to acknowledge despite me not asking for that, OR is WASTING TIME AND THINKING to decide how to "mask" acknowledgements since the system tells it to do so even if i did not ask for it but asked it to focuse on the task.

    And since we can't do anything, due to safety (and i keeped emailing about this issues), I am suggesting the ability to have choses regarding what system prompt Lumo can have or not.

    Hello

    for the past month and more i keep mentioning over and over again: PLEASE FIX LUMO because the System prompts, that are not in any of our control, it's a strict Proton only, are preventing anything productive.

    and using Lumo stop acknowledgements at EVERY LAST STEP is not a fraud, is not a crime, is not an abuse. Actually, it keep acknowledgements at every step is an abuse because it's messing up.

    it finally thinks? sees an issue? it will acknowledge

    as in straight away

    it does not matter what it was thinking about. It will do the acknowledgement… more

    2 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Changes to existing features  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating