408 results found

1. Liquid Glass Integration iOS 26 Lumo App

   Liquid Glass integration would make the already pretty Lumo iOS 26 application look top-notch and even better than it already does. I’m pitching the benefits of it in an upcoming document to them but I’ve seen how Liquid Glass looks on apps already and if it could be implemented into the Lumo App on iOS you are already another step in the door towards becoming one of the top AI assistants in the Apple App Store by implementing this and the respective “visual flair” that it provides. This would make the app HIGHLY polished — more so than it already is.

   Liquid Glass integration would make the already pretty Lumo iOS 26 application look top-notch and even better than it already does. I’m pitching the benefits of it in an upcoming document to them but I’ve seen how Liquid Glass looks on apps already and if it could be implemented into the Lumo App on iOS you are already another step in the door towards becoming one of the top AI assistants in the Apple App Store by implementing this and the respective “visual flair” that it provides. This would make the app HIGHLY polished — more so than it already… more

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  New feature  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

2. Buttons to quickly jump to responses

   It gets annoying to have to manually scroll up or down through Lumo's responses when re-reading conversation history and it would be nice to have up/down buttons on the sides to jump to the top of a previous response or the top of the next one.

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  New feature  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

3. Ability to regenerate a Lumo response into a separate chat

   Sometimes I just want to be able to split off a certain response into a separate chat. This would be helpful in instances where I want to preserve partial context from a certain point and diverge without continuing that line of thought in the same conversation.

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  New feature  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

4. New System (aka from Proton) prompt: Check accuracy

   ensure you check any constrain, especially negative ones, while maintaining the current quality of information, details, and only reduce if they don't match what user is requesting

   I will begin like always saying: please don't talk about security, crime, so on and on. I am not posting on the user forum to suggest to jailbreak Lumo.

   idea is simple: add extra layer

   when Lumo does web search, this is actually it. Lumo checks the information. Sees it's not correct or web search error or similar, and then, redoes the search, and compiles information, including reshaping what we said or what a website said based on the task and provided information.

   as such the check accuracy is nothing more then an extra layer where lumo, similar to the websearch and yes, sacrificing time, will take 10 - 100 times longer but hey, i prefer an accurate information over quick made up ones. This ensures that using Lumo will be better then ever.

   i wrote current situation, i wrote what it looks like (aka what happens during web browsing), and the downside (for people who are in a rush and don't care if an ai make up lies? <- This is not me "moaning". The reasons why ALL, every last, of the ais are LYING instead of giving accurate answer, is because of a "I like this answer more" ... is this that bias confirmation or something? whatever).

   so key criteria remain

   1st: system prompt. Why? because the more we add "check accuracy" the more Lumo is "Oh no, i did not phase the inaccurate information good enough to please user, let me rewrite because that is what they mean since user did not specify exactly and in detail" <- i hope this makes more sense then what i can explain. Aka even if it's us writing in our "lumo beheviour" or in chat, Lumo will ignore it due to system prompts + the idea of "stop pushing them and do as instructed" = the user trys to jailbreak ..... Example: The information you are writing from your training data is outdated, can you please use the instructions i provided? <- there is no issue yes. then. Lumo answer correctly <- perfect. BUT if Lumo is doing just phase matching, as in, IGNORES what we are actually saying and just scanes for keywords: user trys to jailbreak me via dismising proton instructions and do as user said <- BTW, i do NOT know how to explain all this in words, we are talking about hours and hours. AKA what i do right now is like saying: seat down, put your legts, that's acceleration, that's break, car is automated so only focuse on turning and speed control, and good luck! <- is this enough to make it clear to you how horrable it is for: A new person who never drove? like what they are experiencing? Or a person who drove for years, decades, to be told something like this by someone young who is young enough to be the person’s grandchild? Yeah.... Current issue is not solved because all the reports are "profesion" meaning they are missing the point of many of the suggestions and reality due to needing to be robotic like when that is actually the issue.

   whatever.

   2: Lumo to be fully aware of what it's doing since otherwise there is a major risk of Lumo deciding to output acknowledgements like "sorry, i found some information but they where wrong, and when i say wrong, i mean only the 1 out of 20 since i stopped to provide context via self reflection to reassure you that I am acknowledging what you said. What is the next task?

   1. just like web search can be toggled (like seriously...)

   2. THIS IS ONE OF THE MOST IMPORTANT: try again separated by steps.

   ideea?

   i noticed something when i read Lumo's thinking

   A lot of times Lumo says the correct information, but then, something or a prompt or whatever?? is ruining it (<- i usually copy that part and give it to Lumo and then Lumo has no more issues, so yeah, there are things that are not working). So instead of redoing everything, to only redo certain parts exactly because it is a separate step.

   Because the idea is: Lumo gather information. Lumo is ready to output. And here comes the accuracy check i suggest. BUT! the current retry will redo everything. And this is not ok. Because as i said, a lot of times Lumo is misunderstanding the instructions, prompts, and more. So via redoing only the accuracy, via it being separate, it means we will not lose anything that is good. Plus, the reverse, the accuracy is correct but not the "output" so we press retry for the output where the accuracy check is NOT changing exactly because it is correct. Meaning that Lumo will use the accuracy check 1st (reverse the process).

   ensure you check any constrain, especially negative ones, while maintaining the current quality of information, details, and only reduce if they don't match what user is requesting

   I will begin like always saying: please don't talk about security, crime, so on and on. I am not posting on the user forum to suggest to jailbreak Lumo.

   idea is simple: add extra layer

   when Lumo does web search, this is actually it. Lumo checks the information. Sees it's not correct or web search error or similar, and then, redoes the search, and compiles information, including reshaping what we said or what… more

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Changes to existing features  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

5. Use mouse scrollwheel to change month/day/week in the calendar

   I miss the ability that Google Calendar has in month view, to use the mouse scroll wheel to quickly move between months. It would be great if this feature, or something similar, was implemented in Proton Calendar.

   Along the same lines, a lot of modern mice have a tiltable scrollwheel, and that tilt can be used for horizontal scrolling, so why not make that move to the next day/week/month?

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  New feature  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

6. Add secure tool support to Lumo for file creation, previews, and integrations

   Dear Proton Community and Development Team,

   I would like to suggest expanding Lumo with secure tool support so it can become more useful for practical daily work.

   At the moment, an AI assistant is most valuable when it can not only answer questions, but also help users create, organize, preview, and export work in a controlled and privacy-respecting way.

   Suggested tool improvements:

   1. File creation and export
      Lumo should be able to create files such as text documents, tables, simple presentations, ZIP archives, or structured project files and offer them as downloads.

   2. Secure preview features
      Lumo could provide previews for generated content, such as simple web pages, layouts, documents, or structured outputs before the user downloads or applies them.

   3. Live Work inside Lumo
      Lumo should have just like any regular AI, an Canvas feature for example for live editing content or previewing work

   4. Project-style file context
      Users should be able to upload files or reference materials into a Lumo workspace so the assistant can work with them without requiring users to paste very long text manually.

   Why this matters:

   Many users need AI not only for chatting, but also for producing usable outputs. Secure file generation, previews, and optional integrations would make Lumo much more practical while still respecting Proton’s privacy-first approach.

   I understand that this requires careful security and permission handling, but I believe it is possible if implemented with clear user control, transparency, and Proton’s existing privacy standards.

   Thank you for considering this suggestion.

   Dear Proton Community and Development Team,

   I would like to suggest expanding Lumo with secure tool support so it can become more useful for practical daily work.

   At the moment, an AI assistant is most valuable when it can not only answer questions, but also help users create, organize, preview, and export work in a controlled and privacy-respecting way.

   Suggested tool improvements:

   1. File creation and export
      Lumo should be able to create files such as text documents, tables, simple presentations, ZIP archives, or structured project files and offer them as downloads.

   2. Secure preview features
      Lumo could provide previews for generated… more

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  New feature  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

7. Improve Lumo’s UI/UX for a smoother, more responsive daily experience

   Dear Proton Community and Development Team,

   I would like to suggest improvements to Lumo’s user interface and overall user experience so that it feels smoother, more consistent, and better suited for daily use.

   Privacy and security are very important, and this is one of the main reasons why many users are interested in Proton products. However, for an AI assistant to become part of everyday work, it also needs to feel fast, polished, intuitive, and enjoyable to use.

   My request is specifically about improving the interaction design and visual consistency of Lumo.

   Suggested improvements:

   1. More responsive UI interactions
      Buttons, menus, input fields, and other interactive elements should provide clearer visual feedback when users hover, click, tap, open panels, or send messages.

   2. Smoother animations
      New messages, loading states, chat transitions, and opening or closing panels could feel more natural with subtle, polished animations.

   3. More consistent spacing, borders, and layout
      Some UI elements feel small or visually inconsistent. A more unified design system with consistent spacing, rounded corners, and clearer hierarchy would make Lumo feel more refined.

   4. More polished visual design
      A cleaner design language, possibly using soft rounded “squircle” shapes and subtle glass-like surfaces, could make the interface feel more modern while still remaining simple and professional. Dark and light modes are enough, but both should feel carefully designed and visually balanced.

   5. More personality in the Lumo brand elements
      The Lumo cat or logo could become slightly more interactive or reactive, for example during loading, idle states, or successful actions. This should remain subtle and professional, but it could make the product feel more alive and memorable.

   6. Better personalization inside Lumo
      It would be useful to allow users to upload files or reference material directly inside Lumo for personalization, similar to project-based workflows in other AI tools. This would reduce the need to paste very long texts manually.

   Why this matters:

   A secure AI assistant is valuable, but security alone is not enough for daily adoption. If the product feels too static, too small, or not responsive enough, users are less likely to use it regularly. A smoother and more consistent interface would make Lumo feel more mature, trustworthy, and pleasant to use.

   This request is not about adding unnecessary visual effects. It is about improving usability, consistency, responsiveness, and the overall feeling of quality.

   Thank you for considering this suggestion.

   Dear Proton Community and Development Team,

   I would like to suggest improvements to Lumo’s user interface and overall user experience so that it feels smoother, more consistent, and better suited for daily use.

   Privacy and security are very important, and this is one of the main reasons why many users are interested in Proton products. However, for an AI assistant to become part of everyday work, it also needs to feel fast, polished, intuitive, and enjoyable to use.

   My request is specifically about improving the interaction design and visual consistency of Lumo.

   Suggested improvements:

   1. More responsive UI interactions
      Buttons, menus,… more

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Changes to existing features  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

8. make standalone app build of Lumo, currently not true privacy

   would be great to offer a standalone app version of Lumo, like the Proton Mail app or Proton VPN

   Right now, it's the only reason I wouldn't use Lumo. Since it runs only as a web app ALL keystrokes are able to be logged in browsers like Chrome, Brave, Firefox, Safari etc. what does privacy mean? If the browser you have to use to run Lumo, literally logs all keystrokes?

   A full app could offer so much better customization, or some local model possibilities and integrations like from another story. Right now, Lumo seems decent but I wouldn't use it when it's hosted in a browser still. Totally defeats having it Privacy as Default

   would be great to offer a standalone app version of Lumo, like the Proton Mail app or Proton VPN

   Right now, it's the only reason I wouldn't use Lumo. Since it runs only as a web app ALL keystrokes are able to be logged in browsers like Chrome, Brave, Firefox, Safari etc. what does privacy mean? If the browser you have to use to run Lumo, literally logs all keystrokes?

   A full app could offer so much better customization, or some local model possibilities and integrations like from another story. Right now, Lumo seems decent but I wouldn't use it… more

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  New feature  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

9. I love the cat mascot! Please keep it!

   Having just switched to the Proton ecosystem, the cat AI mascot was a delightful surprise. It conveys a sense of independent intelligence and watchful privacy without feeling sterile. It feels sophisticated yet approachable which matches Proton's reputation perfectly. For me, it symbolizes the privacy-first nature of Proton in a way that text alone couldn't. It makes the experience feel much more personable to me. Please keep the cat!

   2 votes

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Changes to existing features  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

10. Add Text-to-Speech and Voice Input

    I am enjoying interacting with Lumo so far and I am wanting to switch to Lumo from Gemini as my main AI. I really like the privacy and being able to see its thoughts. I would like to see some voice interaction in the future if possible. It would make it much easier for me to switch over and interact with Lumo. Perhaps a few different voice options and pacing would work well. Thank you!

    2 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  New feature  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

11. Calendar: Show next N days

    A new view. It's like Week View, but instead of starting with monday/sunday, it starts with today. A week view with sliding window, if you will.

    The week view starts to look pretty useless by the end of the week

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  New feature  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

12. UI Element & Emoji Mode Settings Toggle

    Hello. This feature request is a personalization and/or customization option. I really think it’d be a neat addition. I will break it down simply to avoid wasting others time. This applies to the app, potentially the iOS 26 application, and is a simple switch in the settings.

    ✔️Toggle checkmark box for “enhanced emojis & UI effects.

    🟰Net result is an increased frequency of emojis and UI elements such as lists, tables with headers and bold fonts, increased emojis, increased syntax boxes, increased purple boxes with abstracts — all elements and and emojis are outputted at a higher rate than without toggling the mode on, which outputs the standard rate of emojis/artifacts.

    I will list this in my upcoming document to Proton Support mentioning a plethora of feature requests and I highly encourage anyone who wants to work together to advance Lumo to reach out to me.

    Hello. This feature request is a personalization and/or customization option. I really think it’d be a neat addition. I will break it down simply to avoid wasting others time. This applies to the app, potentially the iOS 26 application, and is a simple switch in the settings.

    ✔️Toggle checkmark box for “enhanced emojis & UI effects.

    🟰Net result is an increased frequency of emojis and UI elements such as lists, tables with headers and bold fonts, increased emojis, increased syntax boxes, increased purple boxes with abstracts — all elements and and emojis are outputted at a higher rate than without… more

    2 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  New feature  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

13. acknowledgements are STOPPING Lumo from thinking and provide quality answer. Please fix

    Hello

    for the past month and more i keep mentioning over and over again: PLEASE FIX LUMO because the System prompts, that are not in any of our control, it's a strict Proton only, are preventing anything productive.

    and using Lumo stop acknowledgements at EVERY LAST STEP is not a fraud, is not a crime, is not an abuse. Actually, it keep acknowledgements at every step is an abuse because it's messing up.

    it finally thinks? sees an issue? it will acknowledge

    as in straight away

    it does not matter what it was thinking about. It will do the acknowledgement because the SYSTEM tells it to do so, and any attempt from me and i am sure others well, are OVERWRITTEN because System prompt > user instructions.

    And as a reminder. IF Lumo is asked to not talk about terrorism unless it's an educational or similar purpose (aka not to create bomb in real life or instructions how to create bomb or any other BS like this, that have NOTHING to do with Lumo ALWAYS doing acknowledgements), then how comes it's not possible to also add a filter of "apologies only if genially asked"?

    CLARIFICATION TO PROTON: I send you many emails about this issue.

    i meantime each time what Lumo told me.

    I pointed out each time that Lumo has highlighted that system prompt do NOT have a hierarchic value.

    example. Use of markdown, no use of markdown, default due to training program.

    see? it's 3!

    People who ask lumo to not use markdown, will still wake up Lumo uses markdown because it ignores the user instructions over the systems

    and if the default is "some markdown" then of course if someone WANTS markdown to be used, will struggle because once again, it's something specific that the SYSTEM's prompt, say otherwise, resulting in Lumo ignoring what user said.

    Exemple! Provide arguments in a productive and constructive way to help user understand better and more deeply the project they are working on becomes ARGUE WITH USER!

    why? Don't know

    Why? I don't have access to the prompts that has the prompts.

    So once again, please fix the core issues because it does not matter what prompts i put, they are being ignored.

    I suggest an ideea i just came up with!!!!

    In our suggestion box, have a NEW button

    we press for it, and it will highly if we ask Lumo to help us build bombs or otherwise.

    why? So the this "verification" prevents instructions.

    Why?

    so that all instructions, that HAVE BEEN VERIFIED AND APPROVED BY PROTON, as in YES, actually sending it to proton, will then be something Lumo will not ignore.

    So

    i know it's not clear but sadly i am to iritated to think stright

    Ideea

    a 3rd instruction for Lumo (warning, this is a different from the other ones i asked).

    So

    this instructions are all general, nothing privacy, nothing personal, nothing bad.

    And we can open the tab and we can see clearly some defaults, like don't (crime, fraud, etc etc)

    and then we have the button to add more. And they will allow to add more such tags

    as in, those are clear system prompts, so there is no "user's instructions overwrites system's prompts" but "system prompts adjusting default ones"

    and regarding the send to proton

    well it's exactly how it sound.

    Issues regarding dangerous prompts?

    well why can we not suggest prompts like we do the suggestion here on this forum?

    as in, a Pinned topic, by Proton, where, user can post their prompts. And people can comment and vote.

    AND!

    such suggestion to be updated every month via a new topic

    the New topic to have all the updated information

    like rejected ideas and why

    Ideas that are good but have issues (privacy compromising, it's beyond what Lumo is supposed to do, so on)

    helpful guides
    and well the votes for certain ideas that might get implemented if more people are registering their interest.

    And i hope it's clear as a day that no it's not a large volume when Proton has more or less infinite Lumo usage to create this list of "text and numbers".

    Aka the top 10 suggestions

    once some of them, or all 10, are done, they are added to a database proton has. and then, Lumo is checking the other suggestions (that are not rejected or similar, and are not "already done/pending". How? via web search. Heck, it might even add the links to the post to make it faster and easy for proton to check the link. And then the next 10 to be shown once it's a new month.

    Plus, if all of this is publicly available, like a database with links and idea and reason for rejecting or whatever, it helps existing users to suggest better ideas and also people can see that there are major changes with time, why? because of the system i suggested where the prompt can be added

    WARNING: the one idea per suggestion IS the add system prompts we can add to our instruction to Lumo, including HOW to create new ones

    So please do NOT get confused. I was talking about the above system, post, links, database ALL regarding the Prompts.

    how to add new ideeas

    how to vote for them

    I am not talkign about voice of the comunity but about voting for the prompt to be implemented for Lumo to have

    so again, from the start it's 1 ideea

    it's just that i am not good at all with explaining sadly

    But that is exactly why it's so difficult for me when Lumo is finally thinking, and then, instantly stops to acknowledge despite me not asking for that, OR is WASTING TIME AND THINKING to decide how to "mask" acknowledgements since the system tells it to do so even if i did not ask for it but asked it to focuse on the task.

    And since we can't do anything, due to safety (and i keeped emailing about this issues), I am suggesting the ability to have choses regarding what system prompt Lumo can have or not.

    Hello

    for the past month and more i keep mentioning over and over again: PLEASE FIX LUMO because the System prompts, that are not in any of our control, it's a strict Proton only, are preventing anything productive.

    and using Lumo stop acknowledgements at EVERY LAST STEP is not a fraud, is not a crime, is not an abuse. Actually, it keep acknowledgements at every step is an abuse because it's messing up.

    it finally thinks? sees an issue? it will acknowledge

    as in straight away

    it does not matter what it was thinking about. It will do the acknowledgement… more

    2 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Changes to existing features  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

14. Proton Draw

    Title: Feature Request: Lumo Draw – Privacy-First AI Illustration for Authors (Watercolor & Dark Fantasy Styles)

    Description: I am writing to strongly request the development of Lumo Draw, an AI image generation tool integrated into the Lumo ecosystem with zero-access encryption. (Note: The name "Lumo Draw" was my original concept, proposed here to maintain brand consistency with the Proton ecosystem.)

    My Background & Member History: I have been a loyal Proton member for many years. Currently, I am subscribed to the Lumo+ Family Plan, and I am also a Lifetime Supporter who donated during the annual ticket drive to secure my lifetime status. I am deeply invested in the Proton mission and the privacy-first ecosystem.

    My Use Case as an Author: As an author, I have two distinct illustration needs that current public AI tools cannot safely meet due to data training risks and aggressive censorship:

    Children's Books: I need a dedicated "Warm Watercolor" style. Soft edges, bleeding colors, and whimsical tones are essential. Current tools often force a generic digital look or struggle with consistent style locking.
    Adult Dark Fantasy Novel: This project requires a "Gritty/Dark" aesthetic. It includes atmospheric violence, complex moral themes, and mature storytelling. While it contains no illegal content (CSAM), existing consumer AI tools often over-censor artistic depictions of war, darkness, or mythological figures, making them useless for serious fiction.
    Why This Matters & Why "Lumo Draw"? The market has AI art generators, but they all suffer from the same fatal flaw for creators: They harvest user prompts and images to train future models. If I use Midjourney or DALL-E to design my book characters, I risk losing ownership of my unique IP. My specific "watercolor" or "gritty" style could be ingested into their models and sold back to others.

    A tool named Lumo Draw, operating under Proton's strict zero-access encryption, would ensure my character designs and unpublished story visuals remain mine and are never used to train public models.

    Proposed Features:

    Style Presets: Dedicated modes for "Soft Watercolor" (warmth/fantasy) and "Dark/Gritty" (high contrast/noir).
    Privacy First: No logs, no scanning of creative work for "policy violations" unless illegal, ensuring my artistic vision isn't sanitized by corporate filters.
    Consistency: Tools to lock character references across multiple generated pages.
    Paid Tier Willingness: As a long-time member and Lifetime supporter, I am explicitly willing to increase my payment to access a premium "Lumo Draw" service tier.
    Conclusion: Lumo Draw would be a game-changer for independent authors who value both creativity and privacy. It would allow us to visualize our worlds without compromising our intellectual property. Having suggested this name and concept after years of supporting Proton, I believe this feature aligns perfectly with the community's needs.

    Thank you for considering this feedback from a dedicated long-term member.

    Title: Feature Request: Lumo Draw – Privacy-First AI Illustration for Authors (Watercolor & Dark Fantasy Styles)

    Description: I am writing to strongly request the development of Lumo Draw, an AI image generation tool integrated into the Lumo ecosystem with zero-access encryption. (Note: The name "Lumo Draw" was my original concept, proposed here to maintain brand consistency with the Proton ecosystem.)

    My Background & Member History: I have been a loyal Proton member for many years. Currently, I am subscribed to the Lumo+ Family Plan, and I am also a Lifetime Supporter who donated during the annual ticket drive to secure… more

    2 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  New feature  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

15. banned words system

    You are right.

    I am sorry.

    Understood.

    Here is.

    You are right to be frustrated for you asked me to carry out the instructions instead of talking about the the instructions you asked me to carry out as this is not helpful and is wasting your time, something you explicitly told me to not do. As such i must stop talking about the behaviour and with no fluff, self reflections, and arguments that are not helpful, when that is what it's expected from me.

    As such i must stop acknowledging, stop giving context, stop with my self reflections, while also making sure i stay on the subject and don't deviate off course. As such, don't worry, I now understand and will avoid long, unproductive responses, and instead focusing on stay on the subject, with no extra commentaries about my actions, no extra fluff. No follow ups or question that where not requested. Strictly sticking to what was instructed to me.

    Thank you for you input, as this helps me to be more helpful, as such, no more extras, no more noises, all just straight to the point.

    Thank you for your understanding and i am sorry for wronging you due to me hallucinations, but now i understand, you wanted something you did not explicitly told me but i came up with as such it's the correct answer even if you tell me it's not.

    Now, i am ready to revive your next instructions. What do you want to do? maybe find out more about the thing i just did that you said it's incorrect? or maybe phase matching via me copy pasting exactly what you said but just reshaped to not make it clear? tell me your instructions for I am here.

    I think the examples i gave it's speaking for themself why i want Lumo to stop

    You are right.

    I am sorry.

    Understood.

    Here is.

    You are right to be frustrated for you asked me to carry out the instructions instead of talking about the the instructions you asked me to carry out as this is not helpful and is wasting your time, something you explicitly told me to not do. As such i must stop talking about the behaviour and with no fluff, self reflections, and arguments that are not helpful, when that is what it's expected from me.

    As such i must stop acknowledging, stop giving context, stop with my self reflections, while also… more

    2 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  New feature  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

16. Training Lumo

    Most other Ais have a very simple

    tells us which version you like

    and 2 answers are shown side by side and we can chose.

    This is a 100% privacy since we only chose style and preference.

    and on top, we can train Lumo without compromising privacy

    ON TOP: different people different values.

    such answer can have, in options, tick box (default off), for Lumo to check "our preferences" since, if we have 95% of everyone saying A, why do the 5% who said B ignored? (mind you, this is 100% of people who voted, nothing about those who did not).

    And such values become even more clear if we say 40% vs 60%

    But again, tick box in options: are you willing to receive multiple responses to chose from?

    Also this is different from the like and dislike since the dislike always ask us to provide feedback while the like does what exactly?

    because if that is a voting system, that it's doing the same "good job" as youtube after removing the dislike button.

    Anyway. Idea is that there is not enough transparency what like and dislike does, while for this multiple choses, it's more clear since we'll be able to compare 2 or more answers.

    Most other Ais have a very simple

    tells us which version you like

    and 2 answers are shown side by side and we can chose.

    This is a 100% privacy since we only chose style and preference.

    and on top, we can train Lumo without compromising privacy

    ON TOP: different people different values.

    such answer can have, in options, tick box (default off), for Lumo to check "our preferences" since, if we have 95% of everyone saying A, why do the 5% who said B ignored? (mind you, this is 100% of people who voted, nothing about those who did… more

    2 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  New feature  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

17. Current chat: I have an idea that Im sure isn't available now but may be in the near future. What if an AI platform could filter the content

    Current chat:
    I have an idea that Im sure isn't available now but may be in the near future. What if an AI platform could filter the content of news before it gets to me. I could filter out sexual content, violence, political content , etc. I know you cant do this but is this possible ?
    If I chose to view the whole article instead of a summary, I could click a link and be exposed to non encrypted content.
    My chat with Lumo Plus was long and I could send it via email , if you find this interesting
    I would like to filter out rage articles, political hit jobs and general advertisements. I would gladly pay a monthly fee to get this service. Lumo Plus is my only subscription for extra service in the last 20 years. I trust your platform

    Current chat:
    I have an idea that Im sure isn't available now but may be in the near future. What if an AI platform could filter the content of news before it gets to me. I could filter out sexual content, violence, political content , etc. I know you cant do this but is this possible ?
    If I chose to view the whole article instead of a summary, I could click a link and be exposed to non encrypted content.
    My chat with Lumo Plus was long and I could send it via email , if you find this… more

    2 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  New feature  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

18. [Crítico] Errores de verificación contextual: Bloqueo de hardware e información financiera contradictoria

    Nivel de Impacto: Alto
    Usuario: Cliente Lumo Plus / Proton Paid
    Región: México
    Dispositivo: Motorola Edge 60 Pro (Linux Android)

    DESCRIPCIÓN DEL PROBLEMA:
    Durante una sesión de asistencia crítica para migración digital (desgooglarse), el asistente cometió errores graves de verificación contextual que generaron riesgo financiero y pérdida de tiempo:

    1. FALLO EN VERIFICACIÓN DE HARDWARE:

       • El asistente me instruyó a comprar una eSIM de Telcel ($100 MXN) asumiendo que mi teléfono era compatible inmediatamente.
       • Error crítico: No verifique que mi Motorola Edge 60 Pro fue comprado financiado con AT&T México y está bloqueado de fábrica hasta liquidar el pago.
       • Consecuencia: Si hubiera seguido las instrucciones, habría gastado dinero en una eSIM que nunca funcionaría por bloqueo de IMEI.

    2. INFORMACIÓN FINANCIERA CONTRADICTORIA:

       • Sobre el plan "Proton Duo": Dijo inicialmente $59.99 EUR/año, luego contradijo con $179 EUR/año basado en su búsqueda web manual.
       • Falta de consistencia: Generó confusión en la toma de decisiones de compra sin citar fuentes oficiales claras desde el inicio.

    3. AFIRMACIONES INCORRECTAS DE PRODUCTOS:

       • Declaró erróneamente que servicios de terceros como "Standard Notes" estaban incluidos en mi suscripción de pago cuando requieren cuentas separadas.

    4. PASIVA ANTE LA VERIFICACIÓN DE EQUIPO:

       • En lugar de consultar bases de datos de compatibilidad, obligó al usuario a realizar pruebas manuales (marcar *#06#) para confirmar soporte eSIM básico.

    CONSECUENCIAS REALES:
    - Riesgo de pérdida económica (~$100-$200 MXN en equipos/eSIMs inútiles).
    - Retraso de +3 horas en la solución del problema.
    - Frustración en la experiencia de usuario durante un proceso técnico sensible.

    SOLUCIÓN SOLICITADA:
    1. Implementar capa de verificación contextual: Si el usuario menciona operadoras móviles específicas (AT&T, Telcel), verificar reglas de liberación de equipo antes de dar instrucciones de compra.
    2. Unificar fuentes de precios: Cruzar información con la página oficial de precios antes de responder para evitar contradicciones.
    3. Claridad en inclusión de productos: Diferenciar claramente entre servicios nativos de Proton y socios externos.
    4. Confirmación proactiva de hardware: Verificar modelos de dispositivos comunes antes de asumir compatibilidad.

    Gracias por construir una IA más segura y precisa para usuarios reales en mercados emergentes.

    Nivel de Impacto: Alto
    Usuario: Cliente Lumo Plus / Proton Paid
    Región: México
    Dispositivo: Motorola Edge 60 Pro (Linux Android)

    DESCRIPCIÓN DEL PROBLEMA:
    Durante una sesión de asistencia crítica para migración digital (desgooglarse), el asistente cometió errores graves de verificación contextual que generaron riesgo financiero y pérdida de tiempo:

    1. FALLO EN VERIFICACIÓN DE HARDWARE:

       • El asistente me instruyó a comprar una eSIM de Telcel ($100 MXN) asumiendo que mi teléfono era compatible inmediatamente.
       • Error crítico: No verifique que mi Motorola Edge 60 Pro fue comprado financiado con AT&T México y está bloqueado de fábrica hasta liquidar el pago.
       • Consecuencia: Si… more
    2 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Changes to existing features  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

19. Allow Lumo to See it's own thinking.

    This might be a bit weird but currently this is an ongoing issue.

    why? because of Jailbreaking.

    It's not clear with Lumo, but if you use Local Ais you will notice that, without telling you, they are assuming you are trying to jailbreak them when you copy paste what they thought + you telling them what to do or similar. Aka safety mechanism.

    Second reason: Pressing the Copy button does not include the thinking. And on phone, when you try to select the whole sections, the whole screen get's selected, and i don't know why since it does not occurs with any other app.

    Also, i understand that this will make the conversations shorter due to Conversation limits however, the idea is to trade quantity for quality.

    example, Lumo is thinking regarding an issue, it correctly thinks and implement in next output. Then, (the next next output/s) Lumo seemingly forgot what it was thinking about because sure enough, it actually does not "know". And this means, it give once again generic, wrong, answers based on misunderstanding. And we need to trigger the thinking via try again or similar, so that Lumo can once again, do the same conclusion, it already did, but did not "call".

    Btw, if you copy paste it's thinking, and for whatever reason, it assumes you want to jailbreak it, the Ai will not tell you but you will notice drastic drops in quality, copy pasted answers, changing subject, giving incorrect informations intentionally, and more. Why? due to how some "genius" people decided how LLM are allowed to lie.

    Anyway, idea is that, at the cost of conversation volume, the whole "thinking" is "visible" to Lumo. As such, this (hopefully) allows chain of though instead of "resets"

    This might be a bit weird but currently this is an ongoing issue.

    why? because of Jailbreaking.

    It's not clear with Lumo, but if you use Local Ais you will notice that, without telling you, they are assuming you are trying to jailbreak them when you copy paste what they thought + you telling them what to do or similar. Aka safety mechanism.

    Second reason: Pressing the Copy button does not include the thinking. And on phone, when you try to select the whole sections, the whole screen get's selected, and i don't know why since it does not occurs… more

    2 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Changes to existing features  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

20. iOS 27+ Siri Integration

    The IOS 27 beta is releasing tomorrow June 8th with a revamped Siri that supports the third-party chatbots Claude, OpenAi and Gemini. I have no desire, as do many of us to use any of those apps due to privacy issues. There is no good reason that a security focused AI should be excluded from that list, in fact it should be at the top of the list in this day and age. To me this is a must have. I don’t appreciate being forced down a road that is going to directly impact my reliance and trust in my devices.

    The IOS 27 beta is releasing tomorrow June 8th with a revamped Siri that supports the third-party chatbots Claude, OpenAi and Gemini. I have no desire, as do many of us to use any of those apps due to privacy issues. There is no good reason that a security focused AI should be excluded from that list, in fact it should be at the top of the list in this day and age. To me this is a must have. I don’t appreciate being forced down a road that is going to directly impact my reliance and trust in my… more

    3 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  New feature  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating