Skip to content

amilopowers

My feedback

5 results found

  1. 3,097 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    amilopowers supported this idea  · 
  2. 7,943 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    amilopowers commented  · 

    On Linux use Chromium and Firefox is always a pretty secure browser. No need for another browser.

  3. 3,769 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We have given this quite a bit of thought, but at the present moment, it is not clear the advantages would outweigh the disadvantages.

    The biggest problem is search. Encrypting all metadata would break metadata search entirely on the web client as there is still no efficient way to handle search of encrypted data within a browser.

    Secondly, metadata encryption’s value from a privacy standpoint is also somewhat dubious. Because we ultimately must deliver the message to the recipient, we must know who the recipient is. At the current time, there still isn’t any proven and viable way to work around this.

    Metadata encryption is an area of continued research for us, and when the opportunity arises and the technology for doing this matures, we will definitely implement it in ProtonMail.

    amilopowers supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    amilopowers commented  · 

    You could use the same technology as Posteo. They encrypt content, email header, sender, recipient, time, subject, attachement etc. https://posteo.de/en/site/encryption#kryptomailspeicher

    The whole Thing is OSS. https://github.com/posteo

  4. 391 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    amilopowers commented  · 

    I've seen that posteo.de and kolabnow.com use DANE (DNSSEC) to secure their e-mail Services.

    I think protonmail could be even more secure with DANE. You can read about it here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DNS-based_Authentication_of_Named_Entities

  5. 284 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    amilopowers commented  · 

    Please keep the .ch domain. There are people in Switzerland who appreciate to have a Swiss domain.

Feedback and Knowledge Base