John
My feedback
4 results found
-
4 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment John
shared this idea
·
-
55 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment John
commented
a collaboration would be a bad idea. Like with Brave, their AI is hard coded to a particular socialpolitical view, which would be a terrible result. All collaborations contain compromises, dont compromise on privacy or quality. More expensive, yes, but it is worth it to not damage your image, your most valuable asset.
An error occurred while saving the comment John
commented
I looked into hosting my own AI, and after 2 days I gave up. The best I got was an out of memory error after asking a question. I tried doing one of those ones you can upload both text and images and get either or both back. Something versatile. Too complicated for my linux laptop.
An error occurred while saving the comment John
commented
The problem with using AI hosted by most companies available now, is you just cant trust that company to not mine your session to repackage and sell somewhere else. That could be your identity data or data related to your brainstorming session.
I would pay extra for access to an AI hosted by a company I trusted to keep my data anonymous. Maybe I could store my own sessions offline to maintain a collaboration, or on our drive provided by proton if nothing else. I need an AI I can trust not to **** my ideas for the company hosting them.
John
supported this idea
·
-
1,160 votesJohn
supported this idea
·
-
1,623 votesJohn
supported this idea
·
The only thing off the table, is what is illegal where the model is, and the client. Everything else should be covered under varying liability waivers, and disclaimers.
The opposite is true as well. Even if I don't agree with it, a person should be able to lock down what enters their home, and is available to their children.