Skip to content

sqybonew@grr.la

My feedback

2 results found

  1. 283 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    sqybonew@grr.la commented  · 

    Bitcoin sidechains and alternative networks is what we need. Not other shitcoins that sacrifice their integrity for speed, smart contracts, or L1 built-in privacy.

    sqybonew@grr.la supported this idea  · 
  2. 2,883 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    sqybonew@grr.la commented  · 

    Not to be a hater, but Monero is not a "crypto" that I think any company wants to hold. It's often attacked for it's anonymity. So much so that it had to be removed from exchanges. Point being, government go after exchanges which are private companies, so why wouldn't they start going after private companies that accept it. I believe accepting Monero would be too much of a burden. If you want good privacy while transacting digitally, why don't y'all look into the Bitcoin Lightning Network or the Liquid Network? Those a good private options for transacting digitally, and they utilize the most resilient network known to man.

Feedback and Knowledge Base