Skip to content

Ben Kirton

My feedback

6 results found

  1. 89 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Ben Kirton supported this idea  · 
  2. 118 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Ben Kirton supported this idea  · 
  3. 205 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Ben Kirton supported this idea  · 
  4. 405 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Ben Kirton supported this idea  · 
  5. 734 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Ben Kirton supported this idea  · 
  6. 116 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Ben Kirton commented  · 

    How insane that this isn't an option. It's a literal sort order and I would guess almost 100% of other email clients sort the other way by default or as an option.
    Outlook on mobile seems to have finally gotten this, so it must be possible if even MS can get it done.
    Honestly, who TF reads email like this? It has to be harder to do it this way as it is an inversion from the immediately preceding list. Top=new -> bottom=new -> top=new -> bottom=new, back and forth.
    9 years tells me it refund time, 2 hours in to migrating.

    Ben Kirton supported this idea  ·