Skip to content

TA

My feedback

5 results found

  1. 3,048 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    TA supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    TA commented  · 

    Please, please, please only do this when there is a good integration story. I would hate to see ProtonMail lose its Gmail-likeness and turn into Outlook Web.

    I would like to see native desktop clients with a virtual disk features that shows all attachments ever received/sent. That would be so much better than the constant uploading and downloading... Labels could function as sub-folders.

    With builtin versioning, the user could even edit a document inside a folder like /Volumes/ProtonMail/Work/Presentation Monday/ and have it suggested as attachment when replying to the email in question.

  2. 3,724 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We have given this quite a bit of thought, but at the present moment, it is not clear the advantages would outweigh the disadvantages.

    The biggest problem is search. Encrypting all metadata would break metadata search entirely on the web client as there is still no efficient way to handle search of encrypted data within a browser.

    Secondly, metadata encryption’s value from a privacy standpoint is also somewhat dubious. Because we ultimately must deliver the message to the recipient, we must know who the recipient is. At the current time, there still isn’t any proven and viable way to work around this.

    Metadata encryption is an area of continued research for us, and when the opportunity arises and the technology for doing this matures, we will definitely implement it in ProtonMail.

    TA supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    TA commented  · 

    +1 (out of votes)
    +1 for DIME support

    I would be very happy if ProtonMail published more details on their security in a user-friendly format... I just don't have the time to read source.

    SECURE! SWISS! SECURE! SWISS! ... is just too much marketing and not enough serious security! Thank you!

  3. 405 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    TA commented  · 

    +1 (out of votes)

  4. 365 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    TA commented  · 

    +1 (out of votes)

    I hope this feature is implemented soon. Technically there shouldn't be many challenges.

  5. 372 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    TA supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base