CoreCat
My feedback
8 results found
-
9 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment CoreCat supported this idea · -
3 votesCoreCat supported this idea ·
-
326 votesCoreCat supported this idea ·
-
1,072 votesCoreCat supported this idea ·
-
687 votesCoreCat supported this idea ·
-
705 votes
Subscribers now have access to offline view with the introduction of the Proton Pass desktop app for Windows:
For more information, including what's coming next, check out: https://proton.me/blog/proton-pass-windows-app
CoreCat supported this idea · -
1,040 votesCoreCat supported this idea ·
-
537 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment CoreCat commentedAs someone who uses an easier password (but still secure obviously) for my password vault, which stores a much stronger password for my proton account. I'd love to be able to use a separate master password
CoreCat supported this idea ·
I second this. I don't have a need for a duo or family account, and I thought that by subscribing to Proton Unlimited, I would have access to proton's entire suite of products and features (Excluding those which only a business would need).
Also although Proton mentions that the model is open source, is the data which that model was trained on ethically collected with permission/from public domain works. Or was it trained from technically public (but still privacy intrusive to scrape) social media posts like every other LLM?
Either way, I have a bad feeling about the future of Proton. As scribe having been introduced to businesses, family, and duo account subscribers (despite being applicable to Unlimited users too, regardless of what a survey says), plus the inclusion of a model with an unknown (or at least unwilling to share) training dataset sets a bad precedent. If we let this go on without some kind of acknowledgement or explanation from Proton, I genuinely fear we'll be boiled slowly.