Lambert
My feedback
4 results found
-
378 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment An error occurred while saving the comment Lambert
commented
Regarding privacy:
The two are contradictory. You should assume that ANY interaction you have with an AI is captured and fed into its training set.
An error occurred while saving the comment Lambert
commented
Don't alllow AI to touch my data, including optimizing email composition and "managing" my inbox (like adding labels, moving my mail to directories, etc.). Spam seems to be fine. Leave it there.
1) My workflow is my workflow. Don't **** around with it by adding labels, "helpful suggestions," moving it, etc.
2) I can't trust AI not to suck down my mail for training sets, and that very much includes whatever AI software or service you purchased.
3) Once you allow AI to touch my email, no matter your good intentions, you've given state actors power to adopt your AI functionality to their purposes. Don't (and please don't tell me you left Switzerland exactly to enable this).
I'm a power user. I don't want to be a disempowered user. Please keep AI slop as far away from me as possible, and especially not in UI/UX I use on a daily, sometimes hourly basis.
Lambert
supported this idea
·
-
1 voteLambert
shared this idea
·
-
6 votesLambert
shared this idea
·
-
3 votesLambert
shared this idea
·
> If you don't like them, just don't use them!
Generally, that's not the case with AI. The requirement to suck up data for training sets is overwhelming, and shown by many examples over the last couple of years.
Unless Proton controls the ENTIRE AI pipeline, there's no reason to trust it, and maybe not even then.
MODERATORS: "Three year olds can understand this" is obviously abusive. Do you support this?