Ryan Cole
My feedback
2 results found
-
69 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment -
757 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Ryan Cole commented
This would definitely be a useful option for subscribers. When using auto-connect, landing on a congested free server can affect speed and consistency, which defeats the purpose of paying for priority infrastructure.
From a performance perspective, it’s very similar to how system optimization works in other areas, if one limited resource gets used accidentally, the whole system slows down. Identifying and avoiding those constraints early usually leads to a much smoother experience. I’ve seen the same concept explained well in tools like https://thebottleneckcalculator.com/
, where the idea is to detect which component is actually limiting performance instead of guessing.An option to exclude free servers would basically remove that potential bottleneck and make auto-connect much more reliable for paid users.
A unified, single-directory sync model definitely streamlines cross-platform file access much better than separate host-based backup folders. Removing that friction prevents file sync delays and performance bottlenecks when working across multiple devices.
Speaking of identifying performance bottlenecks and optimizing system balance, if you are a PC user or gamer wanting to ensure your CPU and graphics card are running efficiently together, you can run a hardware test here: https://thebottleneckcalculator.com/