I would love to be able to use Ctrl-Shift-7 to create a numbered list and Ctrl-Shift-8 to create a bullet list as I can (and do very often!) in Gmail. Thank you.

100% that should come as standard no matte the operating system or browser. We can do encryption but not keyboard shortcuts? Doesn't add up.

being able to press enter or command+enter to complete an action would be great. At the moment the keyboard actions work partially (on MAC)

I'll leave a link here to the current GMail keyboard shortcuts [https://support.google.com/mail/answer/6594] so you can compare with those offered by Proton {https://proton.me/support/keyboard-shortcuts}.

I see that the navigate to enclosing folder has been implemented via ESC. That's great!

Do we have a way to quickly go through the folder list?

Keyboard shortcuts are critical for people who have difficulty using the mouse due to disability issues, such as tendonitis or blindness. Not having a comprehensive set of shortcuts is a key reason to use alternatives.

Here's another important shortcut need: Adding the ability to go from a message BACK to the enclosing folder/label list. Various email clients do this; for example, in Gmail the keyboard shortcut is U.

Easily being able to quickly navigate the entire user interface, such as to different folders, is absolutely a necessity.

Using 's' for spam is serious issue for me. I have 15 years of muscle memory that 's' is for Star. I continually hit 's' for important messages only to have to dig them out of spam. My real worry is that I don't always notice my mistake and my most important emails are being junked.

I'd like to have this option. Protonmail Shortcuts are not affective on my workflow

Agree. User interface standard, once established, is not a place to show creativity and uniqueness. Gmail is the de facto standard now, please follow it.

Would be great to get more keyboard short cuts, eg select all, remove all and than confirmation via enter. at the moment its only partially possible and would be great to be able to operate via the keyboard alone.

It would be nice if the keyboard shortcut to reply (R) and others were enabled for any email in the list of emails in a folder (not just in the open email). This suggestion also applies to access to the Reply and Forward buttons.

We got the "move to folder" key sequence 👏

Now you just need to finish keyboard access to labels. I can select the message (though that seems a little glitchy) and I can invoke the label menu … but I can't apply the labels.

You're almost there. Labels and moving are HUGE for me, and I suspect many others feel the same.

This is my biggest frustration with the web app.

Also, is this still monitored? Never really see any replies.

@Joel, the current shortcuts do include navigating messages with j/k. However, one must first click a message.

See this feature request to add for an ability to enter navigation without using the mouse: https://protonmail.uservoice.com/forums/284483-protonmail/suggestions/42701177--start-me-somewhere-with-keyboard-shortcuts-100

I am pretty desperate for these too. The Gmail shortcuts are intuitive to a vim user, and have way more convenient hand placement. Having the Gmail shortcuts as an option in settings would be really helpful.

I'm really sad that the shortcuts seem to have changed with the web update.

PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE try to implement this. You can even have a template for Outlook users, Gmail users, or mimic vi commands. If nothing else, let the user pick what the shortcuts should be. It's such a productivity killer not being able to customize keyboards. I'm even willing to learn Proton's keyboard shortcuts but there's no way to move the email to Folders/Labels.

This would be really handy. Being able to navigate the email list view with j / k, mark as read/unread with shift+i and shift+u, archive with e, and delete with #. Those are the ones I always tended to use the most.

Any idea if or when the Keyboard shortcuts will be back, I sure miss these?

For how immensely useful and simple this feature is, it can't be too hard to implement can it?