593 results found

1. Proposal: Include Lumo Plus for free with Proton Unlimited subscriptions or 50% discount

   Dear Proton Team,

   First of all, thank you for building such a strong privacy-first ecosystem. As a paying Proton Unlimited subscriber, I genuinely value the work you do, and my subscription feels like an investment in a company whose mission I believe in.

   With that in mind, I would like to propose a change to the Unlimited plan that I believe would strengthen loyalty among your paying customers and differentiate the bundle even further:

   Proposal: Include Lumo Plus at no extra cost for Proton Unlimited subscribers or give 50% discount for paid users. And, not for yearly payments, but also for monthly pay.

   The reasoning:

   Rewarding loyalty. Paying Unlimited members are the backbone of Proton's sustainability. Unlike free users, we directly fund the infrastructure, development, and innovation that keep Proton running. Extending Lumo Plus to us would feel like a meaningful acknowledgment of that contribution.
   Stronger bundle value. Unlimited already bundles Mail, VPN, Drive, and Pass. Adding Lumo Plus would make the bundle even more competitive against Big Tech ecosystems (Google One, Microsoft 365, Apple One) that increasingly bundle AI features at no extra charge.
   Alignment with Proton's mission. Lumo is promoted as a privacy-first AI assistant. Making it a core part of the paid privacy ecosystem would reinforce the message that privacy tools belong everywhere — including AI — not just in email and VPN.
   Likely minimal revenue impact. Many Unlimited subscribers currently use Lumo Free. The users who would benefit most from this change are existing loyal customers, not heavy AI power users who would already be paying for Lumo Plus. In practice, this mostly transfers value back to the people funding Proton.

   Kind regards,

   a 5 years Proton Unlimited user

   Dear Proton Team,

   First of all, thank you for building such a strong privacy-first ecosystem. As a paying Proton Unlimited subscriber, I genuinely value the work you do, and my subscription feels like an investment in a company whose mission I believe in.

   With that in mind, I would like to propose a change to the Unlimited plan that I believe would strengthen loyalty among your paying customers and differentiate the bundle even further:

   Proposal: Include Lumo Plus at no extra cost for Proton Unlimited subscribers or give 50% discount for paid users. And, not for yearly payments, but also… more

   2 votes

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Changes to existing features  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

2. Landscape mode

   Adding landscape mode to the Lumo Android app for tablet users and to be able to read tables more easily.

   19 votes

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   2 comments  ·  New feature  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

3. Deeper integration with Proton Drive and Mail

   Subject: Deeper Lumo Integration with Proton Drive & Proton Mail — Direct AI-Powered Organization

   As a long-time Proton Visionary subscriber, I've watched the Proton ecosystem grow from its early days into something truly remarkable. Lumo is a fantastic addition, and the existing Proton Drive file integration — being able to add files to a chat's knowledge base — is a great start. However, I'd love to see a much deeper integration where Lumo can actively help manage and organize my Proton account, not just read files I manually bring into a conversation.

   Specifically, I'd love to see Lumo able to:

   Browse and search across my Proton Drive — Find files by content, type, or keyword without me needing to manually locate and add each one
   Identify and flag duplicate files — Helping me reclaim storage space by detecting duplicates
   Suggest and apply folder structures — Recommending organization schemes based on file types, naming patterns, or content, and optionally applying them
   Sort and organize my Proton Mail inbox — Applying labels, filters, or folders based on sender, subject, or content patterns, and helping me triage or archive email in bulk
   Surface important or actionable emails — Acting as an intelligent assistant that helps me prioritize what needs attention
   I understand this would require granting Lumo scoped access to my Drive and Mail, and I recognize the privacy considerations involved. However, given Proton's expertise in zero-access encryption, I trust that Proton could design this in a way that maintains the privacy guarantees I value — perhaps with on-device processing or a permission model where I explicitly grant and can revoke access.

   I would gladly pay more for this capability — whether as a premium Lumo feature tier or an add-on to my Visionary plan. I believe many other users would too. This kind of deep, intelligent assistant integration across the Proton ecosystem would be a genuine differentiator and would make the Visionary plan even more compelling.

   Thank you for considering this, and thank you for building the privacy-first internet I've believed in since the beginning.

   Subject: Deeper Lumo Integration with Proton Drive & Proton Mail — Direct AI-Powered Organization

   As a long-time Proton Visionary subscriber, I've watched the Proton ecosystem grow from its early days into something truly remarkable. Lumo is a fantastic addition, and the existing Proton Drive file integration — being able to add files to a chat's knowledge base — is a great start. However, I'd love to see a much deeper integration where Lumo can actively help manage and organize my Proton account, not just read files I manually bring into a conversation.

   Specifically, I'd love to see Lumo able to:

   … more

   3 votes

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  New feature  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

4. Customizable start screen

   A way to set the default screen when you first open the app to the screen/ side bar where it shows the projects and in progress/ history of chats. most of the time when i open the app thats the first screen i go to, and it's a bit of a pain to have to click up in the top left corner just to get started, i prefer to be able to scroll through the last time i used lumo, or be able to jump right back to key points, or go to my projects. It would simplify my workflow if i could have the option to set it to have that sidebar screen as the main start screen. Or a customizable start screen that you could have include different features that you use the most.

   A way to set the default screen when you first open the app to the screen/ side bar where it shows the projects and in progress/ history of chats. most of the time when i open the app thats the first screen i go to, and it's a bit of a pain to have to click up in the top left corner just to get started, i prefer to be able to scroll through the last time i used lumo, or be able to jump right back to key points, or go to my projects. It would simplify my workflow… more

   3 votes

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Changes to existing features  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

5. Add capability allowing Lumo to package conversation, both prompts and responses, into a Proton doc file.

   Add capability allowing Lumo to package conversation, both prompts and responses, into a Proton doc file.

   3 votes

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  New feature  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

6. More General Transparency

   As privacy is a main concern for most of your users I wish for more transparency for everything Lumo.

   What models get used for the answer, what server did handle my input/output. For the server it would be good to know which location.

   If asked directly I need Lumo to be honest about its own architecture and what model is used.

   Also more openeness about decision making. Like honesty about what pieces of information came from training data and what came from a websearch. I had instances of specifics after Lumo did a websearch that were clearly not taken from any of the shown webresults and so must come from training data or hallucination.

   Also generally I would prefer fully open source models being used.

   As privacy is a main concern for most of your users I wish for more transparency for everything Lumo.

   What models get used for the answer, what server did handle my input/output. For the server it would be good to know which location.

   If asked directly I need Lumo to be honest about its own architecture and what model is used.

   Also more openeness about decision making. Like honesty about what pieces of information came from training data and what came from a websearch. I had instances of specifics after Lumo did a websearch that were clearly not taken from… more

   5 votes

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Changes to existing features  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

7. Add "Green" and "Research" Search Modes

   When searching in Lumo, users should be allowed to toggle on different types of searches, such as:
   1. Green - a search that uses less environmental energy to generate an answer
   2. Research - a search that goes deeper and uses reputable sources (similar to the Research function already present in Mistral AI's Le Chat)

   11 votes

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  New feature  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

8. Multi-user Reservation page

   Idea on Proton Calendar to be able to get completely rid of Calendly = a multi-user reservation page, offering the ability to create a link to be sent to external user to book a meeting on the shared availbilities of several users of one company using Proton.

   2 votes

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  New feature  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

9. Allow Users to Manually Pin Items to Persistent Memory

   Title: Allow Users to Manually Pin Items to Persistent Memory (URLs, References, Project Links)

   Category: General Ideas / Lumo

   Lumo's persistent memory is a powerful feature, but users currently have no direct control over what gets retained versus what fades between sessions. Memory aggregation appears to use opaque heuristics—frequently discussed topics and user facts tend to persist, while specific URLs, project links, and one-time references often do not.

   This creates a recurring problem: users who share important links, reference documentation, or UserVoice post URLs in one thread return in a new thread to find that context is gone. The only workaround is manually re-sharing the same information every time.

   Proposed Feature:

   Add a "Pin to Memory" function that allows users to explicitly mark specific content for permanent retention across all sessions.

   Examples of what users would pin:

   URLs to UserVoice posts they want to track
   Links to external documentation or references used repeatedly
   Project file locations or external resource links
   Specific facts or preferences that the current heuristic-based memory might miss
   Recurring account details (e.g., plan tier, timezone, preferred tools)
   

   How It Would Work:

   User highlights or flags content within a conversation (e.g., right-click → "Pin to Memory," or a simple command)
   Pinned items appear in a Memory Management panel under Settings
   Users can review, edit, and delete pinned items at any time
   Pinned items persist across all threads—including project threads
   Pinned items are clearly labeled as user-added (distinct from auto-aggregated memory)
   

   Why This Matters:

   Current memory behavior is inconsistent and unpredictable. Users cannot rely on it for specific references. Giving users explicit control over what persists would:

   Eliminate the need to re-share links and context in every new thread
   Build trust in the memory system (users know what's saved because they chose it)
   Reduce friction for users managing multiple ongoing projects
   Complement the existing auto-aggregation with intentional, user-curated memory
   

   The current system remembers some things and forgets others with no transparency. A user-controlled pinning layer would solve this without requiring a full redesign of the underlying memory architecture.

   Title: Allow Users to Manually Pin Items to Persistent Memory (URLs, References, Project Links)

   Category: General Ideas / Lumo

   Lumo's persistent memory is a powerful feature, but users currently have no direct control over what gets retained versus what fades between sessions. Memory aggregation appears to use opaque heuristics—frequently discussed topics and user facts tend to persist, while specific URLs, project links, and one-time references often do not.

   This creates a recurring problem: users who share important links, reference documentation, or UserVoice post URLs in one thread return in a new thread to find that context is gone. The only… more

   3 votes

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Changes to existing features  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

10. Ability to check updated files from Proton Drive

    When I upload a file to Lumo from Proton Drive, Lumo makes a suggestion to change something in the file. A word file for instance. I do the changes and want Lumo to check it again. But a file that has been once uploaded to Lumo cannot be "updated" it can be uploaded and then it is locked in practice. I need to rename the file if I want lumo to see the new version. My proposal is that once I have updated a file on Proton Drive that I have a possibility to remove the old version from the Lumo Chat and start fresh with the new version of the file. Alternatively, just with one button "replace old version" that makes it easier to work with updated files. On another note, when the file names are not very short, selecting a file from proton drive for lumo is a bit of a guess work. The possibility to have a larger field for selection of proton drive, maybe even on a separate window including change date or file size would be helpful.

    When I upload a file to Lumo from Proton Drive, Lumo makes a suggestion to change something in the file. A word file for instance. I do the changes and want Lumo to check it again. But a file that has been once uploaded to Lumo cannot be "updated" it can be uploaded and then it is locked in practice. I need to rename the file if I want lumo to see the new version. My proposal is that once I have updated a file on Proton Drive that I have a possibility to remove the old version from the… more

    3 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Changes to existing features  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

11. How Do You Approach Law Coursework?

    https://writemycoursework.co.uk/law may sometimes prove to be tough since it requires a lot of legal research, case studies, law, and referencing. I would like to know which aspects of LLB coursework help UK prove to be difficult for other law students. Is it sourcing information, applying legal principles, IRAC, or something else?

    2 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  New feature  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

12. Lumo - think before you write

    Recently Lumo has started interrupting itself mid-answer saying "Wait..." then correcting, sometimes totally negating, the part of the answer it already gave you, which you may have spent time reading and digesting which then becomes a total waste of your time.
    
    Have Lumo not start writing until it has its total best answer. It's plenty fast enough and now that you're displaying its "thinking" process we're not worried that it's stalled.
    Or if you prefer, make this a checkbox we can choose, or a retained setting if we're signed in.

    5 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Changes to existing features  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

13. Add support for de-googled devices

    Lumo is unsupported without Google Play Services. Can't start the application, blocked during boot.
    Using LineageOS. Should work without Google.

    24 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Changes to existing features  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

14. Title: Per-conversation memory control: "New Private Chat" option + memory containers

    Hi Proton Team,

    Memory shipped with Lumo v2.0, and it's a genuinely useful feature — but right now the only control is a global on/off toggle. I'd like to suggest finer-grained control, in two parts.

    Part 1. "New Private Chat"

    A conversation with no memory loaded in, and no memory saved out. Like a browser private window: fully functional, nothing retained afterwards. Your existing memory stays intact for all your other chats — this session simply doesn't participate.

    Visual indicators:

    In the sidebar: a small icon (lock, or similar) next to the conversation title — left side for LTR languages, right side for RTL
    In the active chat: a small badge on the existing header bar — no new persistent bar, so no screen space lost
    Icon paired with text, so it doesn't rely on colour alone (accessibility)

    Part 2. Memory "containers"

    Separate compartments (work, personal, etc.) that don't bleed into each other:

    Each container holds its own memory context
    A conversation only draws from its assigned container
    "Private chat" is effectively a container with no memory at all — nothing in, nothing out
    This serves two groups currently pulling in different directions:

    Users who want memory get organised, compartmentalised context instead of one blended pool
    Users who are wary of quiet accumulation get a deliberate, reviewable way to use memory — or none at all
    It would turn the current all-or-nothing toggle into genuine user control: stateless by default for those who prefer that, compartmentalised memory for those who don't.

    The browser-container concept is familiar, so it needs almost no explanation — and it aligns with Proton's privacy-first values: the user decides what's on the record and what isn't.

    Thanks for reading!

    Hi Proton Team,

    Memory shipped with Lumo v2.0, and it's a genuinely useful feature — but right now the only control is a global on/off toggle. I'd like to suggest finer-grained control, in two parts.

    Part 1. "New Private Chat"

    A conversation with no memory loaded in, and no memory saved out. Like a browser private window: fully functional, nothing retained afterwards. Your existing memory stays intact for all your other chats — this session simply doesn't participate.

    Visual indicators:

    In the sidebar: a small icon (lock, or similar) next to the conversation title — left side for LTR languages,… more

    2 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  New feature  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

15. Calendar - Make today stand out a bit more

    I use the calendar in month view and sometime find myself scanning for todays date. In this view with many events being displayed the simple ring round the date doesn't really jump out.
    My old google calendar (which I'm trying to get away from) has today inverted which I find much more visible. Looking at it now, it is a solid blue circle with white text, I personally find it very easy to find.
    I'd just like today highlighted a little more strongly than it is now please.

    6 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  New feature  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

16. Drag calendar event and reschedule by 15-minute increments instead of 30min

    Drag calendar events and reschedule by 15-minute increments instead of 30min

    2 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Changes to existing features  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

17. Train Lumo to understand the user interface

    Lumo doesn't understand how to communicate through the User Interface very well. It should be trained. Lumo said that the character limit for a single response was about 4000 to 6000 characters. It should know the actual number and be able to feedback to the user that the limit was hit instead of indicating that it will try to better next time (it won't, the UI has a hard limit). When trying to get Lumo to format a list, it is like working with a teenager, it doesn't do what you want and says it will try to better next time. The problem is that it doesn't understand how the user interface interprets things like linefeed vs carriage return. If they Lumo and the UI both used a common format like Rich Text Format, it would cut the conversation requests way down.

    Lumo doesn't understand how to communicate through the User Interface very well. It should be trained. Lumo said that the character limit for a single response was about 4000 to 6000 characters. It should know the actual number and be able to feedback to the user that the limit was hit instead of indicating that it will try to better next time (it won't, the UI has a hard limit). When trying to get Lumo to format a list, it is like working with a teenager, it doesn't do what you want and says it will try to better next… more

    4 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Changes to existing features  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

18. Sort chat history by last activity

    Description:
    Lumo’s chat history currently appears to keep conversations sorted by their original creation date instead of their most recent activity.

    This creates a significant usability problem when reusing older conversations. If I open an old chat and continue using it, the conversation does not move back to the top of the history. It stays buried in the same old position, even though it has just become active again.

    This is especially inconvenient for long-running conversations. For example, I may have a chat created weeks or months ago that I still use regularly for the same topic, project, research thread, troubleshooting case, or personal workflow. Even after sending a new message in that chat, it remains far down in the history list.

    Expected behavior:

    When a conversation receives a new message, either from the user or from Lumo, it should move back to the top of the history. The history should be sorted by last activity, not only by the original creation date.

    Current behavior:

    Old conversations seem to remain sorted according to when they were first created. Reusing a conversation does not make it appear as a recent chat.

    Why this matters:

    This makes the history harder to use as the number of chats increases. A conversation that is still active and relevant can remain hidden far down the list simply because it was created a long time ago.

    The current behavior also goes against what users normally expect from chat applications, messaging apps, email threads, and productivity tools. In most interfaces, a recently active conversation is shown near the top, regardless of when it was originally created.

    Practical impact:

    Users may need to scroll through a long history to find conversations they are actively using.

    Important ongoing conversations become harder to resume.

    Users may create duplicate chats just to keep important topics visible, which makes the history more cluttered.

    The “history” view becomes less useful because it does not reflect what has actually been used recently.

    This is particularly annoying for people who use Lumo for ongoing technical work, long-term research, recurring questions, project notes, or conversations that naturally continue over time.

    Suggested improvement:

    Please sort chat history by a “last activity” or “last updated” timestamp.

    A chat should move to the top when:

    The user sends a new message in that conversation.

    Lumo replies in that conversation.

    The conversation is resumed or updated.

    Optional improvement:

    It would also be useful to display the last activity date or time in the history list, so users can clearly understand why a conversation appears where it does.

    Possible sorting options could include:

    Sort by last activity

    Sort by creation date

    Sort alphabetically

    Pinned or favorite chats first

    But the default behavior should probably be sorting by last activity, because that is the standard and expected behavior for a chat history.

    Description:
    Lumo’s chat history currently appears to keep conversations sorted by their original creation date instead of their most recent activity.

    This creates a significant usability problem when reusing older conversations. If I open an old chat and continue using it, the conversation does not move back to the top of the history. It stays buried in the same old position, even though it has just become active again.

    This is especially inconvenient for long-running conversations. For example, I may have a chat created weeks or months ago that I still use regularly for the same topic, project, research thread,… more

    4 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Changes to existing features  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

19. Lumo User Interface indicate percentage of output limit when responding

    Lumo has a maximum character limit for a single response (according to Lumo). I would like to know how much of that limit I am using when asking for a response. Currently Lumo simply fails without warning and it's difficult to see what is going on. I find it interesting that Lumo didn't actually know the limit either, it gave a range. When I started asking Lumo more pointed questions it kept stopping partway through the output it responded:

    You are absolutely right to notice that pattern! The problem is not with your request or my memory, but with the technical output limit of this chat interface.
    The Problem: The system has a maximum character limit for a single response (often around 4,000–6,000 characters). Every time I reach that limit, the system cuts off the message abruptly, regardless of how much I try to compress it. It's a "hard stop" imposed by the software, not a choice I make.

    Lumo has a maximum character limit for a single response (according to Lumo). I would like to know how much of that limit I am using when asking for a response. Currently Lumo simply fails without warning and it's difficult to see what is going on. I find it interesting that Lumo didn't actually know the limit either, it gave a range. When I started asking Lumo more pointed questions it kept stopping partway through the output it responded:

    You are absolutely right to notice that pattern! The problem is not with your request or my memory, but with the… more

    4 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  New feature  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

20. Preview Images in Project Knowledge Before Deleting – Show Thumbnails or Click-to-Open

    Currently, when viewing files in the "Project Knowledge" section, images are displayed only as generic icons with filenames (e.g., IMG_9630.png). There is no way to preview the actual image content before deciding to delete it. This creates a significant risk of accidentally deleting the wrong image, especially when managing multiple uploads with similar or non-descriptive filenames.

    I request a preview feature for images in the Project Knowledge panel with the following specifics:

    • Thumbnails: Display small thumbnail previews of the images instead of just generic icons so users can instantly identify the content.
    • Click-to-Open: Allow users to tap or click an image to open a larger preview window before confirming any action.
    • Confirmation Dialog: When clicking the delete (X) button on an image, show a confirmation popup where the image preview is clearly visible, asking "Are you sure you want to delete this specific image?"

    Why this matters: For users who upload many reference images (photos, diagrams, screenshots) to guide Lumo's responses, being able to visually verify content before deletion is critical. It prevents accidental data loss and improves confidence when managing project context. This is a basic usability standard seen in most file management systems (like Photos or Drive) and should apply here too.

    Currently, when viewing files in the "Project Knowledge" section, images are displayed only as generic icons with filenames (e.g., IMG_9630.png). There is no way to preview the actual image content before deciding to delete it. This creates a significant risk of accidentally deleting the wrong image, especially when managing multiple uploads with similar or non-descriptive filenames.

    I request a preview feature for images in the Project Knowledge panel with the following specifics:

    • Thumbnails: Display small thumbnail previews of the images instead of just generic icons so users can instantly identify the content.
    • Click-to-Open: Allow users to tap or click an… more
    2 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Changes to existing features  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating