Josh Leslie
My feedback
8 results found
-
187 votes
As of March 2024, this feature is available on the web. Coming soon to other apps.
An error occurred while saving the comment An error occurred while saving the comment Josh Leslie
commented
@Grégory it took the Proton team over 4 years to deliver this "feature" which is actually core to any usable calendar system, especially in any kind of business context. It should 100% have been added *before* Proton Calendar was considered out of "beta".
The (also, arguably core) feature you are asking for is separate, which has to do with recurring meeting invitations from others outside of Proton. I am not sure whether there is a separate Uservoice "Idea" for that, but if there isn't, you should start one, as the Proton team certainly didn't give much attention to this thread for 48+ months. In any case, I agree with you that this is also an annoying limitation, but I am grateful they finally resolved this massive gaff for recurring events that Proton users invite others to.
An error occurred while saving the comment Josh Leslie
commented
This does not work when the event has attendees, still, which is abjectly embarrassing.
I got my hopes up based on Peter's comment below and tried, but get the following:
Update recurring event
You will update all the events in this series. An invitation will be sent to the event participants.There is no such prompt to edit a single occurrence per the support article. This is still, unbelievably, an outstanding deficit in core calendar functionality for Proton Calendar. It should never have come out of beta without this, and it is absolutely unconscionable that it has STILL not been remedied.
An error occurred while saving the comment Josh Leslie
commented
It is beyond moderately absurd that this has been added as a known limitation of Proton Calendar under the Proton Calendar FAQ, instead of just developing the feature. We're coming up on 2 years in May since this was first posted, and still have no timeline on this, which should be CORE functionality of a calendar platform. Proton, do better. :-|
An error occurred while saving the comment Josh Leslie
commented
Agreed @CS. Hard to believe that zero progress has been made with this in the 8 months since I posted in this thread...it is a core feature of a calendar.
Josh Leslie
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment Josh Leslie
commented
This seems to be possible for a single instance of events with no invitees/attendees, but not for events that have invitees/attendees. Quite a glaring omission of key functionality that really is required for recurring events with invitees/attendees, as it is more frequent to have to reschedule a single instance when dealing with multiple peoples' live/schedules.
-
19 votesJosh Leslie
supported this idea
·
-
119 votesJosh Leslie
supported this idea
·
-
660 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Josh Leslie
commented
I wouldn't hold your breath on this one, folks. I have had an open support ticket on one-way read-only syncing between Proton Calendar and Google Calendar since January which has yet to be resolved 🙄
An error occurred while saving the comment Josh Leslie
commented
Reiterating my comment from the other "Shared Calendar" idea, as this is becoming a greater and greater source of needless friction for me.
While I have fully migrated to ProtonMail and ProtonCalendar, my wife still uses Google Calendar and Gmail, and I suspect that will be the case for many ProtonCalendar users who need to share a calendar with their partners/spouses/loved ones. Or Outlook 365, etc. So please consider this as you further flesh out the shared calendar features. While it is an understandable hope, I don't think it is a reasonable expectation that all of our respective loved ones will switch to Proton simply because we have.
Josh Leslie
supported this idea
·
-
426 votes
Sharing a calendar is available on Web.
On next iterations we would like to enable the editing permission on mobile apps and add in the future to only share the "busy" information
An error occurred while saving the comment Josh Leslie
commented
"Available" and functional are two very different things. I have been waiting on a response since JANUARY 31ST as to why this doesn't work to share a calendar with a Google Calendar user (which I expect is the main use case for many Proton users who have spouses, partners or family members who are not Proton users).
What made Proton Calendar the red-headed stepchild of Proton apps? Why are you allocating so many resources to developing new apps, instead of shoring up glaring deficiencies in core functionality in your existing apps? Just last week I got an email from this forum from someone who is leaving Proton due to the fact that it is still not possible to edit a single instance of a recurring meeting with invitees. I cannot say I blame them in the slightest, as it's been YEARS. These are core features, not "ideas" for how to improve Proton Calendar. Truly sad to see the pitiful amount of attention and resources allocated to this key web service.
An error occurred while saving the comment Josh Leslie
commented
I agree with everything you said, Mickey. The only thing I will add, is that while I have fully migrated to ProtonMail and ProtonCalendar, my wife still uses Google Calendar and Gmail, and I suspect that will be the case for many ProtonCalendar users who need to share a calendar with their partners/spouses/loved ones. Or Outlook 365, etc. So please consider this as you further flesh out the shared calendar features. While it is an understandable hope, I don't think it is a reasonable expectation that all of our respective loved ones will switch to Proton simply because we have.
Josh Leslie
supported this idea
·
-
63 votesJosh Leslie
supported this idea
·
-
2 votesJosh Leslie
shared this idea
·
-
47 votesJosh Leslie
supported this idea
·
I took the liberty of searching for the "feature" you are requesting, @Grégory, and ironically it exists and has been errantly marked as "Completed" by the Proton team. It is called "Delete individual entries from shared recurring events".
I suggest reposting your comment there, although since it has been errantly marked as "Completed", it may also be worthwhile to add a new "Idea" even though that is technically a duplicate of the existing one with the title above. But at least it wouldn't be incorrectly marked as "Completed"...