Skip to content

Purple Dragon

My feedback

7 results found

  1. 530 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Purple Dragon commented  · 

    Q-day is approaching quickly.

    Purple Dragon supported this idea  · 
  2. 224 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Purple Dragon supported this idea  · 
  3. 58 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Purple Dragon commented  · 

    I agree. In the name of privacy, it just make sense to extend custom DNS support to support encrypted DNS (DoH, DoT, DoQ, etc) entries too rather than just IPv4 addresses that only support unencrypted DNS queries.

    Purple Dragon supported this idea  · 
  4. 81 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Purple Dragon supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Purple Dragon commented  · 

    I agree. In the name of privacy, it just make sense to extend custom DNS support to support encrypted DNS (DoH, DoT, etc) entries too rather than just IPv4 addresses that only support unencrypted DNS queries.

  5. 683 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Purple Dragon supported this idea  · 
  6. 317 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Purple Dragon commented  · 

    Agreed, I would love to have a security key only option. Perhaps the end user can be forced to set up a minimum of 2 physical security keys to ensure they have a backup plan. Not a fan of TOTP being forced as it defeats the security purposes of allowing security keys by forcing a virtual option.

    Purple Dragon supported this idea  · 
  7. 1,680 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Purple Dragon commented  · 

    Agreed. For increased security, I would love to disable the authenticator app ability and only login with my physical yubikeys. Perhaps the interface can force a minimum of 2 yubikeys to do this to ensure the end user has a backup plan.

    Purple Dragon supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base