Amber
My feedback
155 results found
-
15 votes
Amber
supported this idea
·
-
523 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
Amber
supported this idea
·
-
641 votes
Amber
supported this idea
·
-
686 votes
Amber
supported this idea
·
-
739 votes
Amber
supported this idea
·
-
747 votes
Amber
supported this idea
·
-
1,127 votes
Amber
supported this idea
·
-
1,165 votes
Amber
supported this idea
·
-
1,395 votes
Amber
supported this idea
·
-
1,514 votes
Amber
supported this idea
·
-
1,750 votes
Amber
supported this idea
·
-
1,831 votes
Amber
supported this idea
·
-
2,043 votes
Amber
supported this idea
·
-
2,064 votes
Amber
supported this idea
·
-
2,175 votes
We have given this quite a bit of thought, but at the present moment, it is not clear the advantages would outweigh the disadvantages.
The biggest problem is search. Encrypting all metadata would break metadata search entirely on the web client as there is still no efficient way to handle search of encrypted data within a browser.
Secondly, metadata encryption’s value from a privacy standpoint is also somewhat dubious. Because we ultimately must deliver the message to the recipient, we must know who the recipient is. At the current time, there still isn’t any proven and viable way to work around this.
Metadata encryption is an area of continued research for us, and when the opportunity arises and the technology for doing this matures, we will definitely implement it in ProtonMail.
Amber
supported this idea
·
-
3,964 votes
Amber
supported this idea
·
-
5,243 votes
ProtonMail offers encrypted contacts for both web and mobile applications (https://protonmail.com/blog/encrypted-contacts-manager/). Calendar and note functionality will be released in the future.
Amber
supported this idea
·
-
6,814 votes
Amber
supported this idea
·
-
5 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
Amber
commented
This is a massive privacy problem. If you send a password-protected email from an alias to someone, the body of the email will leak the main email of the Proton account.
This is defeats the purpose of sending protected emails from aliases.
Amber
supported this idea
·
-
6 votes
Amber
supported this idea
·
Caldav and Cardav are old protocols.
They were not designed to be private. As such, you cannot have them and encryption at the same time.
The reason why Google, Microsoft etc offer support for these protocols is because they literally spy on you.