Junior
My feedback
26 results found
-
5 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Junior
shared this idea
·
-
4 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Junior
commented
I was setting up split tunneling and it reminded me of an important detail: the frequency with which IPs change in large web services.
It's crucial for Proton team to implement this feature, along with other enhancements for split tunneling, as soon as possible. This not only delivers the resources that paying customers want but **can also significantly reduce data traffic on the VPN service's servers**.
In my case, for example, data from streaming services passes through the VPN because there was no alternative. Fortunately, they recently implemented split tunneling with a kill switch, which can help, but it will still cause issues at some point when the IPs change, and the data from Netflix and similar services will likely start passing through the VPN again without me noticing.
So, the use of hostnames is an essential first step at this moment.
Junior
shared this idea
·
-
10 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Junior
commented
Many thanks to the Proton team for implementing the feature in 4.3.7!
Junior
shared this idea
·
-
643 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Junior
commented
I’m really considering switching the service to NordVPN because of the dedicated‑IP offer. This is necessary in some contexts, but here it could/should be implemented in a more useful way.
What I think Proton team should consider:
People who use a PC are often alternating between work and personal activities. In some cases it would be very necessary and important to have a dedicated, exclusive IP for those activities (like my use case, for example, as a developer, for secure access to certain services and the like). But it’s also essential to retain the ability to use shared IPs (as is currently the case) to ensure privacy during personal browsing, etc.What I have in mind, and which would be extremely useful, is for any Proton user to be able to purchase as many dedicated IPs as they want and create VPN profiles for each of those dedicated IPs, while still being able to use shared IPs in other profiles. This would provide the best of both worlds, covering both needs: keeping the current functionality for satisfied users and adding support for new use cases (mainly work‑related), which would surely attract more paying customers.
NordVPN, for example, charges for dedicated IPs on a monthly basis for each IP the user wants to buy. A dedicated IP at NordVPN costs just €4.19/month. It could work the same way here.
Reference:
https://support.nordvpn.com/hc/en-us/articles/19484196251921-How-to-purchase-a-dedicated-IP-addressAn error occurred while saving the comment Junior
commented
This is really very important, but the solution needs to come without compromising privacy, security and anonymity.
Junior
supported this idea
·
-
692 votesJunior
supported this idea
·
-
58 votesJunior
supported this idea
·
-
147 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Junior
commented
I was about to open a request at this moment with this intention. I use VPN for both work and leisure, and adopting the same split tunneling rules for all profiles is, frankly, an opening for potential problems, including security issues. Allowing split tunneling to be defined in profiles is essential.
Junior
supported this idea
·
-
322 votesJunior
supported this idea
·
-
6 votesJunior
shared this idea
·
-
6 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Junior
commented
This is directly linked to this other suggestion: https://protonmail.uservoice.com/forums/953584-proton-pass-authenticator/suggestions/50147535-custom-icon-for-custom-items
Junior
supported this idea
·
-
40 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Junior
commented
I came to propose this idea. It could be the use of emojis, for example, since the list is standardized, extensive, and known on virtually any platform.
Junior
supported this idea
·
-
260 votesJunior
supported this idea
·
-
23 votesJunior
supported this idea
·
-
208 votesJunior
supported this idea
·
-
169 votesJunior
supported this idea
·
-
255 votes
Hi everyone, this one is under consideration, pending anti-spam measures we might need to take.
An error occurred while saving the comment Junior
commented
We understand that this is under evaluation. What we need (speaking for myself) is better integration between the email service and the feature.
Sending a new email to a contact, instead of a reply, is really a "pain," and I think it can even be confusing for some users.
We know that this requires a lot of assessments, but this feature is very important for saving us time.
One point you cannot overlook is when the user has many aliases. There needs to be a way to organize everything in Proton Mail; otherwise, it becomes a mess.
Junior
supported this idea
·
-
31 votesJunior
supported this idea
·
-
74 votesJunior
supported this idea
·
-
122 votesJunior
supported this idea
·
-
2,110 votesJunior
supported this idea
·
Implemented in the web version.