Anonymous
My feedback
287 results found
-
154 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
486 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
206 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
6,750 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
391 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
639 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
385 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
155 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
288 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
196 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
648 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
728 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
263 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
2,130 votes
We have given this quite a bit of thought, but at the present moment, it is not clear the advantages would outweigh the disadvantages.
The biggest problem is search. Encrypting all metadata would break metadata search entirely on the web client as there is still no efficient way to handle search of encrypted data within a browser.
Secondly, metadata encryption’s value from a privacy standpoint is also somewhat dubious. Because we ultimately must deliver the message to the recipient, we must know who the recipient is. At the current time, there still isn’t any proven and viable way to work around this.
Metadata encryption is an area of continued research for us, and when the opportunity arises and the technology for doing this matures, we will definitely implement it in ProtonMail.
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
520 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
262 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
204 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
255 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
165 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
295 votes
Hi everyone, this one is under consideration, pending anti-spam measures we might need to take.
Anonymous
supported this idea
·