Skip to content

meh

My feedback

9 results found

  1. 863 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    meh supported this idea  · 
  2. 12 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    meh supported this idea  · 
  3. 8 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    meh supported this idea  · 
  4. 2,904 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Partially rolled out, as per: https://proton.me/support/pass-offline-access


    As per the Spring/Summer Roadmap this will extend out to the Pass Extension: https://proton.me/blog/pass-roadmap-spring-summer-2026

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    meh commented  · 

    this is good! I hope this goes beyond just being able to access the vaults offline, and incorporates a toggle to take a vault(s) offline until and if it's toggled online.
    like, no syncing at all, ever, if a user wants that.
    (this in response to proton's reply that it was partially rolled out)

    meh supported this idea  · 
  5. 199 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    meh supported this idea  · 
  6. 11 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    meh supported this idea  · 
  7. 509 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    meh supported this idea  · 
  8. 107 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    meh commented  · 

    I heard it was an effort to keep countries from blocking vpn ips. but this does this make sense? in the initial request, proton replies that we can download the individual server configs.
    a pain to do manually, but they don't think that a country who wanted those ip addresses would get a pay account and automate the downloads and scraping of ips from the file? is this discouraging, or merely adding a layer to the process?

    meh supported this idea  · 
  9. 13 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    meh commented  · 

    I agree completely. I would like to suggest more access for Unlimited plans, just like you do for so many other of your services (perhaps all of them).
    For Mail, VPN, Drive, etc, you offer basic services for free accounts and expanded services for Unlimited accounts. But not Meet. We have to specifically pay for expanded access for Meet, even if we have Proton Unlimited.
    Why?
    If you don't want to provide the same level of access for Unlimited that you do with a paid Meet account, then there is this OP idea of more than free but less than paid Meet. This is still a glaring inconsistency, but better than nothing.
    Honestly, I have supported paying for Proton specifically because I believe in one of its goals of using the proceeds to offer free encrypted and privacy focused services for those who don't or can't pay for it. Here, having paid for Unlimited Proton offers nothing more when it comes to Meet. It's really not Proton Unlimited, now, is it?

    To me, it is more:
    Proton Unlimited*

    *except Meet.

    meh supported this idea  ·