Skip to content

D

← The Voice of the Proton Community

My feedback

10 results found

  1. Official F-droid Repository

    1,160 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    101 comments  ·  General Ideas » New features  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    D supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    D commented  · 

    Identical to:
    https://protonmail.uservoice.com/forums/945460-general-ideas/suggestions/47229965-publish-all-android-apk-to-fdroid

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    D commented  · 

    The publication of apk's is highly inconsistent. Some only appear on protonapps.com (Calendar, Drive, Wallet), some only on google play (Authenticator, Lumo), some both on protonapps and on f-droid (VPN, Pass), some on protonapps and github (Mail, VPN). Please make this consistent.

    Those of us on GrapheneOS often use Obtainium for .apk's. With Obtainium, the following solutions work:

    (1) include the version number on the protonapps page, so we can identify when the app needs to be updated. Automated or no, right now we can't tell. It would work just as well if the version number were included in the .apk URL. Note this request:
    https://protonmail.uservoice.com/forums/945460-general-ideas/suggestions/50070162-improve-app-versioning-in-protonapps-com

    (2) publish everything to github. Note this request:
    https://protonmail.uservoice.com/forums/945460-general-ideas/suggestions/48103700-include-android-apks-in-all-github-releases

    (3) publish everything to f-droid, which is this request. This is not optimal unless you're doing reproducible builds and keeping your own keys.
    https://protonmail.uservoice.com/forums/945460-general-ideas/suggestions/47173612-official-f-droid-repository

    Another, identical f-droid request:
    https://protonmail.uservoice.com/forums/945460-general-ideas/suggestions/47229965-publish-all-android-apk-to-fdroid

  2. Publish all Android APK to FDroid

    40 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    8 comments  ·  General Ideas » Changes to existing features  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    D commented  · 

    Identical to:
    https://protonmail.uservoice.com/forums/945460-general-ideas/suggestions/47173612-official-f-droid-repository

    D supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    D commented  · 

    The publication of apk's is highly inconsistent. Some only appear on protonapps.com (Calendar, Drive, Wallet), some only on google play (Authenticator, Lumo), some both on protonapps and on f-droid (VPN, Pass), some on protonapps and github (Mail, VPN). Please make this consistent.

    Those of us on GrapheneOS often use Obtainium for .apk's. With Obtainium, the following solutions work:

    (1) include the version number on the protonapps page, so we can identify when the app needs to be updated. Automated or no, right now we can't tell. It would work just as well if the version number were included in the .apk URL. Note this request:
    https://protonmail.uservoice.com/forums/945460-general-ideas/suggestions/50070162-improve-app-versioning-in-protonapps-com

    (2) publish everything to github. Note this request:
    https://protonmail.uservoice.com/forums/945460-general-ideas/suggestions/48103700-include-android-apks-in-all-github-releases

    (3) publish everything to f-droid, which is this request. This is not optimal unless you're doing reproducible builds and keeping your own keys.
    https://protonmail.uservoice.com/forums/945460-general-ideas/suggestions/47229965-publish-all-android-apk-to-fdroid

    Another, identical f-droid request:
    https://protonmail.uservoice.com/forums/945460-general-ideas/suggestions/47173612-official-f-droid-repository

  3. Support Accrescent store

    55 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    11 comments  ·  General Ideas » New features  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    D commented  · 

    While I agree, I don't think Accrescent is in the position to take more apps right now, until they get more support. Many of us use Obtainium to retrieve apps. That would work under the following two conditions. First, publication were consistent. As it stands, some only appear on protonapps.com (Calendar, Drive, Wallet), some only on google play (Authenticator, Lumo), some both on protonapps and on f-droid (VPN, Pass), some on protonapps and github (Mail, VPN).

    Second, Proton would either:

    (1) include the version number on the protonapps page, so we can identify when the app needs to be updated. Automated or no, right now we can't tell. It would work just as well if the version number were included in the .apk URL. Note this request:
    https://protonmail.uservoice.com/forums/945460-general-ideas/suggestions/50070162-improve-app-versioning-in-protonapps-com

    (2) publish everything to github. Note this request:
    https://protonmail.uservoice.com/forums/945460-general-ideas/suggestions/48103700-include-android-apks-in-all-github-releases

    (3) publish everything to f-droid. Note the following requests. This is not optimal unless you're doing reproducible builds and keeping your own keys.
    https://protonmail.uservoice.com/forums/945460-general-ideas/suggestions/47229965-publish-all-android-apk-to-fdroid
    https://protonmail.uservoice.com/forums/945460-general-ideas/suggestions/47173612-official-f-droid-repository

  4. Improve app versioning in protonapps.com

    9 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  General Ideas » Changes to existing features  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    D commented  · 

    100%. Otherwise protonapps.com is useless. Furthremore, the publication of apk's is highly inconsistent. Some only appear on protonapps.com (Calendar, Drive, Wallet), some only on google play (Authenticator, Lumo), some both on protonapps and on f-droid (VPN, Pass), some on protonapps and github (Mail, VPN).

    Those of us on GrapheneOS often use Obtainium for .apk's. With Obtainium, the following solutions work:

    (1) include the version number on the protonapps page, so we can identify when the app needs to be updated. Automated or no, right now we can't tell. It would work just as well if the version number were included in the .apk URL. That is this request:
    https://protonmail.uservoice.com/forums/945460-general-ideas/suggestions/50070162-improve-app-versioning-in-protonapps-com

    (2) publish everything to github. Note this request:
    https://protonmail.uservoice.com/forums/945460-general-ideas/suggestions/48103700-include-android-apks-in-all-github-releases

    (3) publish everything to f-droid. Note the following requests. This is not optimal unless you're doing reproducible builds and keeping your own keys.
    https://protonmail.uservoice.com/forums/945460-general-ideas/suggestions/47229965-publish-all-android-apk-to-fdroid
    https://protonmail.uservoice.com/forums/945460-general-ideas/suggestions/47173612-official-f-droid-repository

    D supported this idea  · 

  5. Graphene Apps

    18 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    5 comments  ·  General Ideas » New features  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    D commented  · 

    Anything in the Play Store has google's libraries in it. The right way to do this is to avoid Google Play altogether by making the apk's available through a FOSS app store. For GOS, that would be Accrescent, F-Droid, or either Github or ProtonApps.com through Obtainium. See multiple requests in this vein, here:

    accerescent:
    https://protonmail.uservoice.com/forums/945460-general-ideas/suggestions/48531431-support-accrescent-store

    f-droid:
    https://protonmail.uservoice.com/forums/945460-general-ideas/suggestions/47229965-publish-all-android-apk-to-fdroid
    https://protonmail.uservoice.com/forums/945460-general-ideas/suggestions/47173612-official-f-droid-repository

    github:
    https://protonmail.uservoice.com/forums/945460-general-ideas/suggestions/48103700-include-android-apks-in-all-github-releases

    for protonapps through obtainium, we need the version number on the protonapps page or in the .apk link:
    https://protonmail.uservoice.com/forums/945460-general-ideas/suggestions/50070162-improve-app-versioning-in-protonapps-com

  6. More support for grapheneos or bring into proton

    14 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  General Ideas » New features  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    D commented  · 

    We have multiple. The best is GrapheneOS. Second, CaylixOS. Third LineageOS.

  7. Stop with politics

    179 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    59 comments  ·  General Ideas  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    D supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    D commented  · 

    Absolutely agree. I'm come here for security apps, and expect to be able to support the causes that I choose. I don't want to have to choose security apps /and/ your cause.

  8. Include Android APKs in all GitHub releases

    34 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    6 comments  ·  General Ideas » Changes to existing features  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    D supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    D commented  · 

    The publication of apk's is highly inconsistent. Some only appear on protonapps.com (Calendar, Drive, Wallet), some only on google play (Authenticator, Lumo), some both on protonapps and on f-droid (VPN, Pass), some on protonapps and github (Mail, VPN). Please make this consistent.

    Those of us on GrapheneOS often use Obtainium for .apk's. With Obtainium, the following solutions work:

    (1) include the version number on the protonapps page, so we can identify when the app needs to be updated. Automated or no, right now we can't tell. It would work just as well if the version number were included in the .apk URL. Note this request:
    https://protonmail.uservoice.com/forums/945460-general-ideas/suggestions/50070162-improve-app-versioning-in-protonapps-com

    (2) publish everything to github, which is this request:
    https://protonmail.uservoice.com/forums/945460-general-ideas/suggestions/48103700-include-android-apks-in-all-github-releases

    (3) publish everything to f-droid. Note the following requests. This is not optimal unless you're doing reproducible builds and keeping your own keys.
    https://protonmail.uservoice.com/forums/945460-general-ideas/suggestions/47229965-publish-all-android-apk-to-fdroid
    https://protonmail.uservoice.com/forums/945460-general-ideas/suggestions/47173612-official-f-droid-repository

  9. Linux Client

    5,025 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1324 comments  ·  Proton Drive » New feature  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    D supported this idea  · 

  10. Ability to remove/delete attachments

    374 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    113 comments  ·  Proton Mail & Calendar » Changes to existing features  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    D commented  · 

    There is a similar request here: https://protonmail.uservoice.com/forums/284483-feedback/suggestions/18356443-delete-attached-images-from-received-email

    You should probably add together the votes on the two of them.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    D commented  · 

    I voted on a similar request, here: https://protonmail.uservoice.com/forums/284483-feedback/suggestions/33019273-delete-attachments-button

    You should probably add the votes together for the two of them.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    D commented  · 

    Best to put an "x" on each file icon, so the attachments can be deleted one by one, as needed.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    D commented  · 

    Just put a little "x" on each attachment icon, so we can delete them individually as needed.

    This is so basic. Please.

    D supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base

(thinking…)