J.
My feedback
5 results found
-
2,019 votes
Proton and Standard Notes are joining forces: https://proton.me/blog/proton-standard-notes-join-forces
An error occurred while saving the comment -
3,756 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment J.
commented
I'd help translate.
-
2,083 votes
We have given this quite a bit of thought, but at the present moment, it is not clear the advantages would outweigh the disadvantages.
The biggest problem is search. Encrypting all metadata would break metadata search entirely on the web client as there is still no efficient way to handle search of encrypted data within a browser.
Secondly, metadata encryption’s value from a privacy standpoint is also somewhat dubious. Because we ultimately must deliver the message to the recipient, we must know who the recipient is. At the current time, there still isn’t any proven and viable way to work around this.
Metadata encryption is an area of continued research for us, and when the opportunity arises and the technology for doing this matures, we will definitely implement it in ProtonMail.
An error occurred while saving the comment J.
commented
+1
-
544 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment J.
commented
Maybe @proton.com? Anyway, great idea!
-
6,691 votesJ.
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment J.
commented
Just copy what Abine has done. They offer unlimited masked email addresses that forward to your real address. You turn them on/off at will or delete them whenever you want. You can have a unique email address for each website!
I think this feature would be great for ProtonMail.
Glad to hear it's coming.