Jake H

My feedback

10 results found

  1. 3,330 votes
    How important is this to you?
    Jake H supported this idea  · 
  2. 244 votes
    How important is this to you?
    Jake H supported this idea  · 
  3. 692 votes
    How important is this to you?
    Jake H supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Jake H commented  · 

    It's great that we can use Bridge to access email in third-party clients, but since meeting invites get sent by email and you need to be able to open them in an application when you get them, it really doesn't make sense that we can't use Bridge or something like it for calendar too. Of course I get that the underlying technology is different (WebDAV is not IMAP/SMTP) but from a user perspective it makes no sense for email to work and not calendar.

  4. 874 votes
    How important is this to you?
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Jake H commented  · 

    Agreed. Various event booking sites like Eventbrite send you a confirmation email with an "add to calendar" link, with the option of ICS format which Proton supports - but it still takes a whole series of steps: download the file, open Proton calendar, settings - import/export - import from ICS - select the file - done. If I was using the default Apple calendar I'd be done in one click.

  5. 14 votes
    How important is this to you?
    Jake H supported this idea  · 
  6. 330 votes
    How important is this to you?
    Jake H supported this idea  · 
  7. 173 votes
    How important is this to you?
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Jake H commented  · 

    This would be very helpful indeed. Calendly integrates with MS and Google calendars, would be great to integrate with Proton too. As I understand it, it can't read details of appointments or invitees, it only shows available blocks and allows people to book them. Or if there is a sound reason not to integrate, Proton Calendar should have the option for us to do this natively (obviously an option as not everyone will want to share their availability info).

    Jake H supported this idea  · 
  8. 8 votes
    How important is this to you?
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Jake H commented  · 

    I really like that when applying filters to a set of mails, Proton gives the option to add a filter based on those senders. However, the logic is very basic and leads to too many active filters.
    1. If you do this more than once for the same sender (easily done when selecting multiple emails) the filter for that sender gets duplicated - literally the exact same filter with a 1 or a 2 etc. on the end of the name. So check if it already exists, and if so don't create it again.
    2. If I apply a label to emails from a certain sender, and later I move emails from that sender to a folder, and each time I select to create a rule for that sender, this creates two filters. Would be nice to check whether there is already a rule for that sender and combine them, i.e. apply label and move to folder at the same time.
    3. Predictive filters: if I've created filters for several senders with the same domain, Proton could tell that I probably just need a filter for the domain - it could at least prompt whether I want to do that rather than have lots of separate ones.

    Jake H supported this idea  · 
  9. 29 votes
    How important is this to you?
    Jake H supported this idea  · 
  10. 695 votes
    How important is this to you?
    Jake H supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base