Skip to content

Ivo

My feedback

9 results found

  1. 3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Ivo shared this idea  · 
  2. 311 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Ivo supported this idea  · 
  3. 140 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Ivo supported this idea  · 
  4. 222 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Ivo supported this idea  · 
  5. 1,332 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Ivo supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Ivo commented  · 

    This would be spectacular, it's a feature I sorely miss in any password manager. The ability to detect and either merge or clean-up duplicate logins would make managing all the entries much easier.

  6. 1,489 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Ivo supported this idea  · 
  7. 6,681 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Ivo supported this idea  · 
  8. 62 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Ivo commented  · 

    Blocking of ads and trackers is an important part of maintaining user privacy and the ability to browse the internet without being constantly surveilled or provided with skewed content based on the decisions of algorithms.

    NetShield is cool, but it would be great to have a more comprehensive blocking capability in Proton VPN similar to the likes of AdGuard. Currently, it is clunky to use AdGuardd or DuckDuckGo tracking protection together with VPN because most platforms allow only one VPN connection at a time and a "fake" VPN is necessary for the blocking services to work.

    Important features for this are:
    -Ability to either activate some blocklists from a wider Proton-curated collection or to subscribe to custom blocklists and have the app regularly check for their updates.
    - Ability to add custom block/allow rules.
    - Ability to filter all DNS requests.
    - Potentially ability to customize rules per app on platforms that allow this (Android only afaik).
    - Ability to inspect HTTPS traffic by inserting itself into it with its own certificate. This is important for blocking DNS requests made by apps via HTTPS.
    - Possibly a companion extension in desktop browsers to complement blocking with esthetical adjustments (removal of empty spaces left after ads) and adding blocking rules straight from the page.
    - Log of requests. This is important for user troubleshooting in case important DNS requests get blocked.

    Ivo supported this idea  · 
  9. 1,237 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Ivo commented  · 

    I think privacy oriented AOSP rom would be great. De-googled roms are great and all, but what I'd like to see is a ROM that actively denies access to data and information, or "poisons the well" by submitting random noise to any apps, including google. Whether we like it or not, most people still want access to google's app ecosystem, so having the comfort of android with much more aggressive privacy controls, tracking protection and robust encryption would imho work for many people.

    Low-level system access would also allow for useful privacy features like ability to clone encrypted system image to a usb drive and replace the system on the phone with a dummy install son the go. Then easily restore the original system image later. Great for border checks etc.

    Ivo supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base