Skip to content

Anonymous

My feedback

7 results found

  1. 1,681 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    +1

    KeePassXC has this, though if this can be done without using any "slots" (like the HMAC challenge-response thing KeePassXC uses) that would be great.

  2. 433 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    I'd like to chime in and say ALL Proton apps -- desktop or mobile or whatever -- should ideally support a separate PIN. Maybe even support for a duress PIN.

  3. 1,033 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    On one hand, this would be a neat feature. In practicality, I would only use this if Proton could guarantee complete privacy like they can with their e-mail system. But, the NSA is so hard-tapped into the international phone grid, that I don't think even Proton can protect their users against illegal mass surveillance even if they wanted to.

  4. 13 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Anonymous shared this idea  · 
  5. 660 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  6. 2,571 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  7. 369 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    I was about to make a suggestion like this but I'm glad someone else thought of it.

    This is what I was going to post:

    -------------------
    Device-specific alias visibility

    The ability to toggle visibility of an account's various aliases (and thus the existence of e-mails associated with those aliases) based on either what device you're logged into, or in the case of Android/IOS, what PIN you unlock the app with. The "duress PIN" approach for mobile devices might be easier to implement.

    This would be useful for journalists, attorneys, political activists, etc in places where the state of being on the wrong side of the mood of a corrupt authority figure who can coerce an unlock would put their confidential contacts and other sensitive information at risk.

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base