Anonymous
My feedback
303 results found
-
304 votesAnonymous
supported this idea
·
-
255 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
349 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Anonymous
commented
It’s been fun to see Proton so excited about passkeys* and be so damning of other technology companies whose own passkey implementation has been lacklustre or platform locked.
*Proton Pass only, so it’d be nice to have a fully passwordless Proton account.
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
155 votesAnonymous
supported this idea
·
-
186 votesAnonymous
supported this idea
·
-
44 votesAnonymous
supported this idea
·
-
528 votesAnonymous
supported this idea
·
-
45 votesAnonymous
supported this idea
·
-
271 votes
Hi everyone, this one is under consideration, pending anti-spam measures we might need to take.
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
210 votesAnonymous
supported this idea
·
-
367 votesAnonymous
supported this idea
·
-
628 votesAnonymous
supported this idea
·
-
1,856 votesAnonymous
supported this idea
·
-
669 votesAnonymous
supported this idea
·
-
2,037 votesAnonymous
supported this idea
·
-
2,109 votes
We have given this quite a bit of thought, but at the present moment, it is not clear the advantages would outweigh the disadvantages.
The biggest problem is search. Encrypting all metadata would break metadata search entirely on the web client as there is still no efficient way to handle search of encrypted data within a browser.
Secondly, metadata encryption’s value from a privacy standpoint is also somewhat dubious. Because we ultimately must deliver the message to the recipient, we must know who the recipient is. At the current time, there still isn’t any proven and viable way to work around this.
Metadata encryption is an area of continued research for us, and when the opportunity arises and the technology for doing this matures, we will definitely implement it in ProtonMail.
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
6,714 votesAnonymous
supported this idea
·
-
5,004 votes
ProtonMail offers encrypted contacts for both web and mobile applications (https://protonmail.com/blog/encrypted-contacts-manager/). Calendar and note functionality will be released in the future.
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
30 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Anonymous
commented
It'd be great if Proton hosted their own (Discourse) community and feature request forums, e.g. forums.proton.me or discourse.proton.me and moved UserVoice and Reddit discussions there. Having a privacy-friendly place to discuss and vote for new features, post about company, product, and industry news, etc would be a welcome change to the privacy nightmare that is Reddit Corp and other social media platforms.
This UserVoice forum is overloaded with duplicate ideas. Discourse makes it simple to merge or split threads. Search for any idea on UserVoice and you find many posts about the same thing, many old without any “status” activity. It’s frustrating.
I fully understand the desire to outsource this sort of thing ten years ago when Proton was a smaller company. That’s no longer the case.
They could engage a small number of community leaders to assist with moderation if needed. People are happy to help. But I think the continued insistence that they need to use Reddit, UserVoice, X, etc flies in the face of the community’s desire for privacy friendly alternatives. Why should I sacrifice my privacy with these platforms just so I can stay up to date on Proton news or chat with the community?
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
1,059 votes
This feature is a work in progress.
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
Great to see Linux also getting the lo... oh, wait, nevermind.