Kelly
My feedback
1405 results found
-
998 votes
Kelly
supported this idea
·
-
1,088 votes
Kelly
supported this idea
·
-
1,131 votes
Kelly
supported this idea
·
-
1,956 votes
Kelly
supported this idea
·
-
27 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment -
203 votes
Kelly
supported this idea
·
-
161 votes
Kelly
supported this idea
·
-
286 votes
Kelly
supported this idea
·
-
17 votes
Kelly
supported this idea
·
-
38 votes
Kelly
supported this idea
·
-
21 votes
Kelly
supported this idea
·
-
36 votes
Kelly
supported this idea
·
-
296 votes
Kelly
supported this idea
·
-
84 votes
Kelly
supported this idea
·
-
67 votes
Kelly
supported this idea
·
-
63 votes
Kelly
supported this idea
·
-
30 votes
Kelly
supported this idea
·
-
38 votes
Kelly
supported this idea
·
-
105 votes
Kelly
supported this idea
·
-
71 votes
Kelly
supported this idea
·
> * Alignment with Proton's Mission: By offering a highly functional free tier, Proton reinforces its commitment to making privacy-focused tools accessible to everyone, while still maintaining a sustainable revenue model through the premium offering.
This right here is an issue. By making the free tier this way, it offers too much for free.
> * Increased User Acquisition & Engagement: An "unlimited efficient" free tier would significantly lower the barrier to entry, encouraging more users to adopt Lumo for their daily AI needs, making it a staple tool.
No. At this time, what they currently offer is sufficient. if users want more, they are encouraged to pay.
> "unlimited efficient" free tier
By having this, it doesn't entice users enough into paying for more features. It tells them "Why pay when we have unlimited efficient but for free"
Implementing another type of a balanced tier might be a viable option.