Kelly
My feedback
1452 results found
-
31 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment -
257 votes
Kelly
supported this idea
·
-
212 votes
Kelly
supported this idea
·
-
386 votes
Kelly
supported this idea
·
-
25 votes
Kelly
supported this idea
·
-
46 votes
Kelly
supported this idea
·
-
21 votes
Kelly
supported this idea
·
-
47 votes
Kelly
supported this idea
·
-
403 votes
Kelly
supported this idea
·
-
103 votes
Kelly
supported this idea
·
-
79 votes
Kelly
supported this idea
·
-
71 votes
Kelly
supported this idea
·
-
37 votes
Kelly
supported this idea
·
-
41 votes
Kelly
supported this idea
·
-
131 votes
Kelly
supported this idea
·
-
85 votes
Kelly
supported this idea
·
-
289 votes
Kelly
supported this idea
·
-
149 votes
Kelly
supported this idea
·
-
Warn/prohibit use of filenames incompatible with filesystems commonly used on Windows, macOS, Linux.
50 votes
Kelly
supported this idea
·
-
53 votes
Kelly
supported this idea
·
> * Alignment with Proton's Mission: By offering a highly functional free tier, Proton reinforces its commitment to making privacy-focused tools accessible to everyone, while still maintaining a sustainable revenue model through the premium offering.
This right here is an issue. By making the free tier this way, it offers too much for free.
> * Increased User Acquisition & Engagement: An "unlimited efficient" free tier would significantly lower the barrier to entry, encouraging more users to adopt Lumo for their daily AI needs, making it a staple tool.
No. At this time, what they currently offer is sufficient. if users want more, they are encouraged to pay.
> "unlimited efficient" free tier
By having this, it doesn't entice users enough into paying for more features. It tells them "Why pay when we have unlimited efficient but for free"
Implementing another type of a balanced tier might be a viable option.