Mario Abreu
My feedback
263 results found
-
115 votes
Mario Abreu
supported this idea
·
-
284 votes
Mario Abreu
supported this idea
·
-
280 votes
Mario Abreu
supported this idea
·
-
389 votes
Mario Abreu
supported this idea
·
-
1,083 votes
Mario Abreu
supported this idea
·
-
1,750 votes
Mario Abreu
supported this idea
·
-
143 votes
Mario Abreu
supported this idea
·
-
564 votes
Mario Abreu
supported this idea
·
-
2,660 votes
Mario Abreu
supported this idea
·
-
679 votes
Mario Abreu
supported this idea
·
-
1,708 votes
Mario Abreu
supported this idea
·
-
901 votes
Mario Abreu
supported this idea
·
-
812 votes
Mario Abreu
supported this idea
·
-
1,275 votes
Mario Abreu
supported this idea
·
-
841 votes
Mario Abreu
supported this idea
·
-
69 votes
Mario Abreu
supported this idea
·
-
113 votes
Mario Abreu
supported this idea
·
-
15 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
Mario Abreu
supported this idea
·
-
1,085 votes
Mario Abreu
supported this idea
·
-
175 votes
Mario Abreu
supported this idea
·
I align with this idea, in true second factor certain more critical accounts should have the second factor stored separately of the main secret. I believe less critical accounts should be ok to have the second factor stored in Proton but for more critical I would like to mark that I have 2FA elsewhere so I'm not notified on Pass Monitor but protected in any case. Maybe something as simple as an ignore feature on Pass Monitor for 2FA, or something more complete as a checkbox stating I use it but store it elsewhere.