protablo
My feedback
186 results found
-
16 votes
protablo
supported this idea
·
-
25 votes
protablo
supported this idea
·
-
34 votes
protablo
supported this idea
·
-
43 votes
protablo
supported this idea
·
-
46 votes
protablo
supported this idea
·
-
40 votes
protablo
supported this idea
·
-
57 votes
protablo
supported this idea
·
-
72 votes
protablo
supported this idea
·
-
101 votes
protablo
supported this idea
·
-
143 votes
protablo
supported this idea
·
-
111 votes
protablo
supported this idea
·
-
70 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment -
82 votes
protablo
supported this idea
·
-
77 votes
protablo
supported this idea
·
-
50 votes
protablo
supported this idea
·
-
200 votes
protablo
supported this idea
·
-
42 votes
protablo
supported this idea
·
-
58 votes
protablo
supported this idea
·
-
1,800 votes
protablo
supported this idea
·
-
679 votes
protablo
supported this idea
·
does flatpak even allow vpn functionality despite the sandboxing?
the call for flatpak is really just a call for expanded support for linux distributions
snaps are hardly universal when they depend on a single distributor and all the flatpak requests hardly discuss the technical feasibility of VPNs in that package format
after all, no one really understands networking on linux well not to mention knowing networking, linux, and packaging