Skip to content

TCS

My feedback

29 results found

  1. 4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    TCS commented  · 

    The request is to let the user choose what folder to default to, rather than to dictate what folder is defaulted to. Currently, Proton Mail dictates that Inbox is the default which it reverts to in endless annoying tedium for those who prefer to see All Mail (or perhaps another folder). Note that messages filtered to folders won't be noticed as new mail messages when Inbox is the default, and therefor subtlly affects the whole folders and filters paradigm.

    TCS shared this idea  · 
  2. 2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    TCS commented  · 

    I have NetShield on and NAT type set to Moderate (type 2). The other option for NAT type is strict. There is no "off".

    TCS shared this idea  · 
  3. 3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    TCS shared this idea  · 
  4. 2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    TCS shared this idea  · 
  5. 821 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    TCS commented  · 

    A Skype (defunct) and Google Voice competitor is going to be hard to do, for those were/are free for simple use case scenarios. MS Teams doesn't fill the bill as a Skype replacement either. I'm using Google Voice, currently--there is no better free option, IMO. I have a feeling that Proton Meet is going to be a Teams-like thing (and Zoom... etc.) rather than a Voice-like thing. I have no use for that.

    TCS supported this idea  · 
  6. 890 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    TCS commented  · 

    Mozilla Thunderbird has a simple task list. It also has events/calendar, that I use rather than Proton Calendar (I haven't evaluated Proton Calendar much yet).

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    TCS commented  · 

    I find the MS To Do app good enough for my simple needs but don't like that it's an MS product with all the associated privacy concerns. Hence, I too would like a Proton To Do app. I prefer standalone apps rather than integrated like Mail + Calendar.

    TCS supported this idea  · 
  7. 62 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    TCS commented  · 

    Today I saw the comments that indicated that under 'Advanced', there is the choice to open the Pass extension in a window, so I tried it. Now we're talkin'! Works great! The resizing of the window WORKS MUCH BETTER THAN THE PP DESKTOP APP, allowing more flexible resizing (fix the desktop app, now, please). Also, you can open MULTIPLE PP windows from different Proton accounts that you may have--I can see that being very useful for organizing entries across accounts. The actual extension, though, still needs to fix the tiny drop-down PROBLEM and allow it to be pinned (disappearing between copying a user ID and then a password is unwelcome TEDIUM). (Hint: Assign someone at Proton the role to identify and orchestrate correction of all the tedium in using Proton software--of which there is much!)

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    TCS commented  · 

    Opening the Proton Pass WEB APP in a browser tab is another way to use Proton Pass, which is distnct from using the Proton Pass browser extension. So, the three ways to use Proton Pass are:

    1. Desktop or phone app.
    2. Web app.
    3. Browser extension.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    TCS commented  · 

    Please, please, please, allow the browser extension for Proton Pass to be resized vertically or simply use the entire browser vertical area. Please, please, please don't follow Microsoft's poor lead on the issue, that is, MS provides too small dialogs and such in so many places in Windows that it makes their OS frustrating to use.

    TCS supported this idea  · 
  8. 2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    TCS shared this idea  · 
  9. 3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    TCS shared this idea  · 
  10. 11 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    TCS supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    TCS commented  · 

    Yes. I was trying to do exactly that, when I found this suggestion. I go to the shared place on ProtonDrive, select all the files there, and no "unshare all" option. It's such an obvious thing to do, and I wonder why the forethought wasn't there upon first implementation to include that functionality. Please add this functionality Proton!

    And even more tedium: unsharing a file elicits another prompt asking whether you're sure you want to unshare! Argh.

  11. 18 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    TCS shared this idea  · 
  12. 26 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    TCS shared this idea  · 
  13. 8 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    TCS shared this idea  · 
  14. 15 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    TCS shared this idea  · 
  15. 31 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    TCS commented  · 

    Surely, you are using "templates" to mean what is more commonly known as a user-defined composite type (like a data structure in C or a record in Pascal).

    I would refrain from using "template" for a user-defined composite type to preclude any conflation with programming language (PL) "generic types" (C++ uses "templates" to refer to its generic typing facilities, e.g.). The naming of constructs varies across implementations. Consider "field name", "database column name", "data member name" used across various technologies, e.g.

    "data type": number, text, binary blob, composite type, etc.
    "composite type": user-defined aggregate (i.e., data grouping) data type
    "data member name" (AKA, "field name"): a name chosen for identifying/accessing specific data within a composite data type.

    structure Person {
    text name
    number age
    Address home_address
    Address work_address
    }

    where,

    "Person" is the user-defined composite data type name
    "text" and "number" are built-in type names
    "Address" is a user-defined composite type name
    "name", "age", "home_address", "work_address" are the structure's data member names

    Add facilities to associate user-defined operations/behaviors (verb) with the user-defined composite data (noun) and you've created (or exposed to the end user) an object-oriented programming facility.

    I've looked at PP's "other type" facility just briefly today based on posts in this forum indicating that it is implemented in the latest PP version (why I manually had to download the desktop PP app without notification and installation from the app directly is unknown to me, and another commonly expected facility lacking in PP for some reason, though I recall getting an email indicating improvements in PP were available) so I don't have any comment on that yet.

    (I don't write code much anymore, but learned to code and programming language implementation tech decades ago).

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    TCS commented  · 

    Next stop, a full-fledged type system and scripting language used across all Proton products?

  16. 3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    TCS shared this idea  · 
  17. 33 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    TCS commented  · 

    The feeling I'm getting so far on this site, is that Proton is very slow to improve their software, for as long as some things have been wants for users and asked-for here. I subscribe to the beta versions of Proton software where they offer that. That said, I do think that Proton's software is overall pretty good. The glaring lack of commonly expected software behavior functionality is "odd" (for lack of, perhaps, a better term that escapes me at the moment). It seems like they are reinventing things like edit CONTROLS from scratch wherever they are used, rather than having anything like self-contained packages of functionality that are reused throughout a program ("controls", in the Windows development realm, e.g.). Aside: it's "odd" (not if you're not a sottware developer) that users would associate basic non-application-specific functionality to a specific application program like ProtonPass and BitWarden.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    TCS commented  · 

    Currently, edit boxes in ProtonPass do not allow right-clicking with the mouse and thereby making pasting into the edit box not as easy as it can be (Shift-Insert from the keyboard works, though as an alternative). Please enable this or explain why it will not be enabled. The same issue may be present in all Proton products, so this is actually a request for ALL of the products to allow this functionality, be it the desktop apps, the web apps, or the browser extensions.

    TCS supported this idea  · 
  18. 5 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    TCS shared this idea  · 
  19. 2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    TCS shared this idea  · 
  20. 660 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    TCS supported this idea  · 
← Previous 1

Feedback and Knowledge Base