Anonymous
My feedback
14 results found
-
45 votesAnonymous
supported this idea
·
-
55 votesAnonymous
supported this idea
·
-
65 votesAnonymous
supported this idea
·
-
5 votesAnonymous
supported this idea
·
-
3 votesAnonymous
supported this idea
·
-
8 votesAnonymous
supported this idea
·
-
5 votesAnonymous
supported this idea
·
-
6 votesAnonymous
supported this idea
·
-
7 votesAnonymous
supported this idea
·
-
39 votesAnonymous
supported this idea
·
-
38 votesAnonymous
supported this idea
·
-
161 votesAnonymous
supported this idea
·
-
60 votesAnonymous
supported this idea
·
-
156 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
While Proton has made commendable efforts in developing ProtonPass, the extra password solves nothing, and the current design prevents it from serving its purpose as a password manager. The requirement to use the same password as other Proton products significantly reduces its utility and security benefits. Many users have expressed frustration with this constraint, as it essentially means they still need a separate password manager. For a company that prides itself on security and privacy, this approach is difficult to understand. The current implementation falls short of expectations, especially considering the caliber of talent at Proton... CERN, MITm caltech,Harvad, PhD´s etc. It would be beneficial for Proton to carefully consider user feedback and reevaluate their design choices for ProtonPass. A more flexible and secure solution that allows for a separate master password would greatly enhance ProtonPass's functionality and appeal. This change is necessary for ProtonPass to fulfill its intended role as a comprehensive password manager and align more closely with Proton's reputation for robust security measures. I am very disappointed to say the least, to see such a solution from a company like Proton, its hard to comprehend, and I am having difficulties to recommend Proton in general to anyone at the moment. ProtonPass is with its current design totally useless.