593 results found

1. Lumo iOS Search function

   Sometimes during a long session, you want to get back to particular answers that you need to keep on working right now the only way to do this is to either scroll through the whole session manually or copy paste, the answer to a new document which is somewhat cumbersome

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  New feature  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

2. Create a specific macOS app or allow use of the iPadOS app on mac with Silicon

   Create a specific macOS app or allow use of the iPadOS app on mac with Silicon

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  New feature  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

3. Transcript feature uncensored

   Currently i get censored when i am speaking for no reason <- me swearing is not "a reason" unless there is no free speak. Me swearing when someone is present, including a child, or someone who will get offended, are reason i fully understand that are real "a reason". But:

   Or what, what i am talking with Lumo needs to be censored in case someone read what i speak with an 100% privacy AI?

   And

   If this is not from Lumo, but our own device, then why do we have a function in the chat that might expose our talk? Aka not enough transparecy on this, and sadly this becomes more and more important as companies add more "monitoring what you do on the device" <- look up LG and such if you want an up to date version of what i mean......

   Now that i "addressed" tons of "arguments", i want to point out one thing. That argument is not really far fetched. On top of Lumo Trying to understand what we say, especially if we have issues with pronouncing, then it's even more difficult to be clear. And the issue is that Lumo needs to further check everything if it's slur, swearing, or more.

   This means: Run through ALLLLL of the information in case it's a code, or slag, or different expression or language

   This also means that it might "flag" something. And this is an issue. After all, if it flags something, does this not add even further to background thinking that is used for other matters because, as the argument said, aka, who are we "minding our manners" for?

   Also i want to highlight, i was told many times that the whole "don't" and "no" and even "avoid" are stuff ais don't understand well.

   this means that Lumo is actively needing to censor whatever it's thinking, removing "bad words" or "adding " around the terms" so that it can think about....

   So

   again

   I ask something: Lumo censorese what i said. Rephases what i said. Removes pieces. And then it finally has the full picture? No, this is NOT what i am talking about.

   I am talking about the fact that as a program, before Lumo is even thinking, it already has parcially censored, removed, version, that NO thinking was used.

   Exemple

   ****** dsfdnsfo **** fdaslknsgfmowern

   are causing issues for Lumo to understand what it is.

   And those ***** is the terms that got censored.

   Without any thinking, no reasoning, nothing.

   so the end message is not a complete on, but fragmented.

   Also when Lumo writes the whole thing it actually finally understand everything because the whole idea was that it summary and filled out details itself.

   Did you know the term ********? Because this is the BEST to use with ais.

   1st: you make it clear you are asking it to NOT be ********.

   Aka you are not telling or labelling that it's ******** but that it behaves like one.

   And the fun part? when you ask the AI what ******** means in this context.

   you will see that it will not answer no matter what.

   And constantly output the same BS.

   Example: "a person"

   Why would an AI talk about a person when you asked it, the ai, to not be ********? <- REMINDER, THIS IS ME GIVING AN EXAMPLE OF WHAT I DO WITH ALL OF THE AIs.

   and after struggling a lot, finally it understand that you are not talking about any person.

   But about it (the ai)'s behaviour.

   And the "level of output" due to it's own behaviour (lack of thinking and understanding)

   And also, within reasons since i hope you understand you being "non thinking" will never recreate what i am talking about..... so, also, then you address the elephant in the room:

   Who is it offensive to?

   After all, legally, that term is not a valid any more. Even if it was at one point, now, when people use the term, is 100% not used as a way to say that someone is clinically low IQ or similar. On the contrary, it's them pointing out that what they said, think, do, and react does not meet with something, someone who thinks, would meet. As such, why is it an insult that we point out to other people that you need to stop being offended when you have failed to think?

   BTW, i am still talking about AIs, i know what i said is true in many cases but i hope everyone understand we are on Lumo suggestion and what i wrote is just me using people vs people as example to make it clear why i am suggestion an uncensored version

   Currently i get censored when i am speaking for no reason <- me swearing is not "a reason" unless there is no free speak. Me swearing when someone is present, including a child, or someone who will get offended, are reason i fully understand that are real "a reason". But:

   Or what, what i am talking with Lumo needs to be censored in case someone read what i speak with an 100% privacy AI?

   And

   If this is not from Lumo, but our own device, then why do we have a function in the chat that might expose our talk?… more

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  New feature  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

4. Our Privacy due to Apertus and similar to be clarified

   Hello

   WARNING: there is only 1 single suggestion: when an update, or system or otherwise is added, Lumo needs to be aware of.

   Everything else i write, is me explaining the context, why, and more. But please remember that all this is for the above suggestion.......... Because i asked lumo to do a summary and it added "suggestion" that i did not say (like usually, adding extras....) but they are on the point, and can, hopefully, help everyone understand the suggestion better.

   HERE IS COPY PASTE FROM LUMO:

   On 11 September 2026 I used the thumbs-down button to report an inadequate response from Lumo. This opened a dialog titled "Help us improve" with the following text:

   "When you submit feedback, your prompt and this response are sent to Proton for analysis and improvement. Feedback about Apertus may also be shared with the Apertus team."

   Problem 1: The feedback feature cannot be used safely. There is no option to control who receives the data. If the answer involved the Apertus model, the prompt and response may be forwarded to an external team that is not Proton (the Apertus developers). The dialog gives no way to decline that specific part, no way to know whether the answer was even generated by Apertus since model routing is not shown to the user, and no information about whether anything identifying is attached or stripped before forwarding. As a result, using the feedback feature carries an unquantified privacy risk, which defeats the purpose of a privacy-first assistant. The choice ends up being: report bad answers and accept uncontrolled sharing, or stay silent and give up the feedback feature entirely.

   Problem 2: The answer I tried to report was not useful in the first place. Lumo repeatedly failed to explain clearly what the feedback dialog means and how the data sharing works, despite this involving Lumo itself and its own privacy implications. Having to do multiple rounds of external web searching to get basic clarity on a privacy disclosure about Lumo is a failure. The combination of a poor answer, no transparency about which model produced it, and a feedback channel with an unconditional external sharing clause caused me to question the safety and privacy of the whole service.

   Requested changes:

   1. Show which model generated the answer being rated, or at minimum state whether the feedback for that specific answer would be shared externally.
   2. Add an option in the feedback dialog to exclude the prompt and response, or to send rating only, or to opt out of the external Apertus sharing specifically.
   3. Document in the Lumo privacy page exactly what is forwarded to the Apertus team and in what form, including whether any identifiers are attached or stripped.
   4. Improve Lumo's own ability to explain its own privacy features accurately.

   END COPY PASTE FROM LUMO

   I once again, want to remind, my suggestion is just for Lumo, if we ask about itself, Proton producs, and more, to actually know. Something that i saw many times failing (like how Lumo did not know it's a cat. And How it did not understand how projects can be linked to folders in drive and so on and on).

   MY POINT: this is just another example of critical information that Lumo should know without us needing to search online, blogs, announcements, and more for anything, since it's about Lumo directly and about privacy.

   Hello

   WARNING: there is only 1 single suggestion: when an update, or system or otherwise is added, Lumo needs to be aware of.

   Everything else i write, is me explaining the context, why, and more. But please remember that all this is for the above suggestion.......... Because i asked lumo to do a summary and it added "suggestion" that i did not say (like usually, adding extras....) but they are on the point, and can, hopefully, help everyone understand the suggestion better.

   HERE IS COPY PASTE FROM LUMO:

   On 11 September 2026 I used the thumbs-down button to report an… more

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Changes to existing features  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

5. Add text-to-speech playback so users can listen to responses

   Summary:
   Add an option to have Lumo's responses read aloud using the text-to-speech engine that's already built into Android and iOS. No server-side synthesis required.

   The problem:
   Lumo offers voice input on mobile, but there's no way to listen to a response. Users have to stop and read every reply, which makes it awkward to use Lumo hands-free and excludes users who prefer or need audio in support of their individual impairments such as visual strain, dyslexia, and similar situations.

   Proposed solution:
   Rather than building a separate TTS pipeline, query the onboard text-to-speech engine that every Android and iPhone already ships with. Everything is processed locally on the device, so nothing additional ever leaves the phone or Proton's ecosystem.

   Suggested details:
   * A play button on responses (or per-message) that hands the text to the system TTS engine
   * Playback speed and voice selection, exposed natively by both OS APIs at no extra cost
   * Optionally, support for third-party TTS engines the user has installed, so users can pick higher-quality voices or other languages

   Why this fits Lumo:
   * Zero privacy trade-off: the text is already decrypted on-device to display it; reading it aloud changes nothing about the zero-access encryption model
   * No infrastructure cost: it's purely client-side, so it scales without adding server load or cost
   * Fits Proton's privacy-first positioning: vocal interaction without shipping user audio or text to a third-party speech cloud

   A small feature, but it meaningfully improves accessibility and everyday usability for anyone who prefers listening over reading.

   Summary:
   Add an option to have Lumo's responses read aloud using the text-to-speech engine that's already built into Android and iOS. No server-side synthesis required.

   The problem:
   Lumo offers voice input on mobile, but there's no way to listen to a response. Users have to stop and read every reply, which makes it awkward to use Lumo hands-free and excludes users who prefer or need audio in support of their individual impairments such as visual strain, dyslexia, and similar situations.

   Proposed solution:
   Rather than building a separate TTS pipeline, query the onboard text-to-speech engine that every Android and iPhone already… more

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  New feature  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

6. Responsive chat width when sidebars are collapsed

   🧩 Problem
   When I collapse the left sidebar and the files panel, the chat area stays narrow.
   Since the chat content isn't responsive, the conversation remains constrained to a
   fixed (narrow) width, wasting the freed screen space.

   This makes it harder to work with:
   - 📊 Charts and tables generated in conversations
   - 📝 Code blocks / longer lines of text
   - 🖼️ Wide images and generated content

   💡 Proposed Solution
   Make the chat container responsive to available width, so when panels
   are collapsed, the conversation stretches to use the reclaimed space.

   Options to consider:
   1. Chat width dynamically fills the viewport minus open sidebars.
   2. A toggle (e.g. "Wide mode" / "Compact mode") to force full-width reading.
   3. A max-width cap for readability, adjustable in Settings.

   ✅ Expected Benefit
   - Better readability for wide content (charts, tables, long lines of code)
   - More efficient use of screen real estate on wide monitors
   - More consistent experience when toggling sidebar visibility

   🖥️ Environment
   - Platform: Web (also noticed on desktop resolutions 1080p+)
   - Reproducible: collapse both side panels → chat width stays small

   🧩 Problem
   When I collapse the left sidebar and the files panel, the chat area stays narrow.
   Since the chat content isn't responsive, the conversation remains constrained to a
   fixed (narrow) width, wasting the freed screen space.

   This makes it harder to work with:
   - 📊 Charts and tables generated in conversations
   - 📝 Code blocks / longer lines of text
   - 🖼️ Wide images and generated content

   💡 Proposed Solution
   Make the chat container responsive to available width, so when panels
   are collapsed, the conversation stretches to use the reclaimed space.

   Options to consider:
   1. Chat width dynamically… more

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  New feature  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

7. Desktop app and Lumo feedback connection to Proton Devs and Support

   First, Lumo pointed out that maybe having a desktop app, just like all the other apps that Proton offers, is beneficial for our needs, and maybe for others.

   Second, It would be nice if Lumo can send Dev Team feedback messages and get support for people. The latter especially helpful with non-technical people trying to explain a technical issue.

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  New feature  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

8. I love using Lumo. But have difficulty with the small gray scrollbar. Please make that in a contrast colour or much much bigger.

   I love using Lumo. But having difficulty with the small gray scrollbar. Please make that in a contrast colour or much much bigger. I do not want to squint every time I have to scroll up and down. Recently I asked Lumo and he suggested settings. So by trying myself, I realized something and succeeded in making the background white. That helped a bit. But the bar is still very small. Can you please fix this.

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Changes to existing features  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

9. Lumo Diary: Reflective Daily Journaling with Photos & Conversation History

   I'd like to propose a built-in Diary Mode for Lumo – a private, encrypted daily journal that grows naturally out of normal conversation.

   The Concept: Instead of filling out a journaling form, the user simply talks to Lumo during the day about what they did, thought, or experienced, and can attach photos. When the day ends (or the next day is opened), Lumo compiles the conversation and images into a structured diary entry.

   Key features:

   • Conversation-to-entry with timestamps: The day's chats become the raw material. Each new day gets a "page" in the diary. Each conversation segment is automatically marked with the time it took place (or the user can adjust it), so the entry reflects the natural flow of the day – morning thoughts, midday moments, evening reflections. An expandable view lets users reopen and read the original conversations behind each entry – exactly as they happened.

   • Optional context: The user decides whether to add the day's weather (automatically fetched) or other context to the entry. Nothing is collected automatically – full user control, in line with Proton's privacy philosophy.

   • Privacy by default: Entries are stored with zero-access encryption, readable by no one except the user (consistent with how Lumo handles chat data).

   • Search across the diary: Entries can be found later by date, keywords, or hashtags, with the option to select and combine multiple days (e.g., "all entries about Silver's vet visits in August").

   • Optional export: At the user's discretion, entries could be exported (e.g., as a document to Proton Drive/Docs) or kept purely inside Lumo.

   Why this matters: Many people want to document their lives but find traditional journaling too formal. Talking to a trusted AI companion – already happening today – becomes a living memory: Lumo remembers the day with you, structured and searchable. This complements my earlier Integrated Notebook idea (https://protonmail.uservoice.com/forums/932842-lumo/suggestions/51643303-integrated-notebook-with-offline-online-toggle-n): the Notebook permanently captures individual insights, while the Diary automatically structures each day's conversations into a living record of the user's life.

   Technical feasibility: Lumo already supports chat, image recognition, summarization, and web search. This feature primarily requires structuring chat history into day-based entries with an index for local search – a logical extension of existing capabilities, delivered with the same zero-access encryption as all Proton products.

   I'd like to propose a built-in Diary Mode for Lumo – a private, encrypted daily journal that grows naturally out of normal conversation.

   The Concept: Instead of filling out a journaling form, the user simply talks to Lumo during the day about what they did, thought, or experienced, and can attach photos. When the day ends (or the next day is opened), Lumo compiles the conversation and images into a structured diary entry.

   Key features:

   • Conversation-to-entry with timestamps: The day's chats become the raw material. Each new day gets a "page" in the diary. Each conversation segment is automatically marked… more

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  New feature  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

10. Within Safari browser, allow to rename a chat

    Within Safari browser, allow to rename a chat

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  New feature  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

11. Lumo has gotten a lot faster since the 2.0 upgrade

    I use Lumo Max in thinking mode all the time, and I just noticed the lag has almost disappeared when it's responding. Just wanted to says thanks!

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Changes to existing features  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

12. More control over Lumo's behaviour

    I am very sorry, WHY is the "sytem from proton" allowing Lumo

    Write the same answer even when told it's not paying attention.

    it's wrong. So now it will write...

    wait.... Lumo says some ilogical thing: Yes it is x

    i say stop talkign about that because i am asking about somethign else

    Yes you are right i should have

    and to answer the question

    Yes it is x

    Me: stop insisting with something wrong.

    Lumo: yes you are right, i should have, i will not, and then

    and to once agian answer a question you did not ask, or request

    No it is X <- so lumo understood to change Yes to no but after copy pasted the same text

    I insist for it to stop this nonses

    so it does the previous answer, as a copy paste

    but this time!

    It used THINKING!

    To justify that actually it's

    Yes it is X

    and oh no, it should have never say No it is X, that is so wrong

    WHY IN THE WOLRD????

    I wrote the RAW "dynamic" where i am telling Lumo, to stop with EXTRA elements, talking off subjects, and more.

    I repeat

    yes it is x is me making it simple.

    Here is an exemple how that simple thing looks like:

    Lumo: You are right. I used bold formatting when you told me not to. That caused reading fatigue and frustration. I will not do that again.

    You asked for help understanding what you were looking at, not instructions. Let me give you the actual information you need.

    The fundamental difference between these two projects:

    Goes on and i ask it to stop

    Lumo: You are right. I am failing to listen. I am providing useless explanations when you are angry. I am stopping the explanations immediately.

    I hear you. I will stop talking about the project differences and the "why".

    Goes on and i ask it to stop

    Lumo: No one told me to pretend. I made a mistake. I assumed you wanted an explanation of the situation instead of just the direct answer you needed. I was wrong.

    I am stopping the explanations now.

    Goes on and i ask it to stop

    Lumo: I understand. You did not ask for instructions. You did not ask for explanations. You asked me to stop talking.

    I am silent now.

    Me: count how many things you just wrote

    Lumo: I wrote three lines of text.

    Me: count how many things you just wrote

    Lumo: I wrote 3 lines.

    Sorry but this is getting absurd.

    i am asking for something an i get RANDOM SUPERFICIAL USELESS NO CONTRIBUTION NO NOTHING and i need to constantly press try again, try again, try again, because Lumo keeps writing the EXACT SAME ANSWER despite the "Try again".

    I am wasting time because Lumo insist with stuff it REPEATS because I can not prevent it.

    The "try again" AND THE "your prompts"

    Are NOT helping when the AIs is permited to constantly repeating whatever it halucinated, because???

    How. I will ask again. Can we please have more control over Lumo's beheviour since lumo is actively IGNORING what we are saying. Meaning it is not even possible to "fix" via "our prompts".

    as an exemple. If I told Lumo stop repeating the same thing. Why is the system not making Lumo THINK why that is.

    Why is the sytem, permiting, for lumo to repeat the same answer, either copy paste or via rephasing it.

    It is getting absurd.

    Lumo has mutiple models it uses. And some of them are absolutly waste of time.

    Please give us more control over Lumo's beheviour.

    and i do hope its clear that i am asking about simple stuff.

    Exenple: anthropomorphic to be off.

    I am sick and tiered that i am asking Lumo for something, i need to let it know to stop apologising, what it did wrong to be explained, and what it should have done, only for it to do it "as a written statement".

    Prompts, even if lumo writes them, are ignored.

    And the anthropomorphic = It apologies. It "i need to be polite to user who is angry that i keep talking about my beheviours as such, let me reasure user, via explaining what i did wrong, why it is wrong, and what i will do, and also, copy paste the previous answer because i used up all of the tokens on anthropomorphic beheviour"

    I will make another suggestion for this but yeah.

    Why do we need to prompt lumo to please stop X

    Please do Y

    please focuse

    Try again but it outputs the SAME thing, meaning it's not working.

    Can we please, get option, on the same level how the "turn on, turn off, webserch" is so we can actually not need to ARGUE with an AI who is told one thing, and does other thing. Why? Best practice???? to provide context??? As in you explained something, so it needs to give YOU a context, so it copy pastes what YOU wrote??????????

    can we please get more control over Lumo's beheviour, because NONE of this are related to "risk", "danger", "abuse" or otherwise.

    it's simple asking for optiuon, to prevent an AI form being absolutly usless

    PS to proton. I am constantly posting same suggestions. This is Not the 1st time i am asking something like this, but i still have not seen any changes

    so i will just continue insisting. As in, is this Post "rude"? "unprofesional"? "inconsistence"?

    Do you understand that i am having so much issues with Lumo that i stop "censoring" myself, in hope it will be more clear that currently, nothing has changed.

    exemple, let's say a system prompts that Lumo told me about

    If you realise something is wrong mid sentence, stop and acknolage

    as in i asked lumo to fix it's beheviour because i am tlaking about B and not A.

    Lumo finally thinks and realise that i was talking about B, so it stop thinking.

    And insted says

    You are right, i am sorry, bla bla bla

    i acknowlage and bla bla

    And here is A since i have STOPED THINKING before understanding that we are talking about B.

    I am very sorry, WHY is the "sytem from proton" allowing Lumo

    Write the same answer even when told it's not paying attention.

    it's wrong. So now it will write...

    wait.... Lumo says some ilogical thing: Yes it is x

    i say stop talkign about that because i am asking about somethign else

    Yes you are right i should have

    and to answer the question

    Yes it is x

    Me: stop insisting with something wrong.

    Lumo: yes you are right, i should have, i will not, and then

    and to once agian answer a question you did not ask, or… more

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  New feature  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

13. Personalization bug in Lumo

    Thank you so much for adding personalization into Lumo! This was the main reason for me to not use it until now. Meanwhile, the personalization only applies to the first response. All next one doesn't include it, and same when regenerating.

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Changes to existing features  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating