John
My feedback
16 results found
-
2,292 votes
John
supported this idea
·
-
35 votes
John
supported this idea
·
-
1,471 votes
-
171 votes
John
supported this idea
·
-
1,320 votes
John
supported this idea
·
-
1,163 votes
John
supported this idea
·
-
2,110 votes
John
supported this idea
·
-
182 votes
John
supported this idea
·
-
3,471 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
John
supported this idea
·
-
1,749 votes
John
supported this idea
·
-
978 votes
John
supported this idea
·
-
1,716 votes
John
supported this idea
·
-
3,009 votes
John
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment
John
commented
To all the people talking about how happy they are with todoist: if you are sincere commenters (and not just trollers or advertisers), I think you're totally missing Proton's point. Proton doesn't intend to and is not expected to provide a better ToDo, email or calendar app. They intend/are expected to provide good apps that ENCRYPT USER DATA (client-side). Since Todoist doesn't do so, a Proton ToDo would not be a competitor since it would just bring something that many value while Todoist doesn't even try to do it.
-
253 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
John
commented
Rejoyce, F (below comparing with Google Calendar) and OP, as this feature clearly exists, at least in the web app and the Android app.
-
5,017 votes
John
supported this idea
·
-
523 votes
Sharing a calendar is available on Web.
On next iterations we would like to enable the editing permission on mobile apps and add in the future to only share the "busy" information
John
supported this idea
·
Or Proton could at least act like a "contact provider" in the accounts category, to let any contact app fetch (decrypted) contacts from it.