John
My feedback
19 results found
-
16 votesJohn
supported this idea
·
-
4 votesJohn
shared this idea
·
-
3 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment -
6 votesJohn
supported this idea
·
-
336 votesJohn
supported this idea
·
-
2,747 votesJohn
supported this idea
·
-
50 votesJohn
supported this idea
·
-
1,852 votes
-
272 votesJohn
supported this idea
·
-
1,644 votesJohn
supported this idea
·
-
2,681 votes
As mentioned in the previous update on this feature, it is now being edited to be a request for slides.
Please feel free to undo your vote if this is not something you want included in Proton Drive.
John
supported this idea
·
-
238 votesJohn
supported this idea
·
-
4,056 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment John
commented
Or Proton could at least act like a "contact provider" in the accounts category, to let any contact app fetch (decrypted) contacts from it.
John
supported this idea
·
-
2,226 votesJohn
supported this idea
·
-
1,152 votesJohn
supported this idea
·
-
2,111 votesJohn
supported this idea
·
-
3,553 votesJohn
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment John
commented
To all the people talking about how happy they are with todoist: if you are sincere commenters (and not just trollers or advertisers), I think you're totally missing Proton's point. Proton doesn't intend to and is not expected to provide a better ToDo, email or calendar app. They intend/are expected to provide good apps that ENCRYPT USER DATA (client-side). Since Todoist doesn't do so, a Proton ToDo would not be a competitor since it would just bring something that many value while Todoist doesn't even try to do it.
-
272 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment John
commented
Rejoyce, F (below comparing with Google Calendar) and OP, as this feature clearly exists, at least in the web app and the Android app.
-
560 votes
Sharing a calendar is available on Web.
On next iterations we would like to enable the editing permission on mobile apps and add in the future to only share the "busy" information
John
supported this idea
·
The OP seems to be a specialist, which I am not. From a simple non-knowledgeable user's point of view:
- I think the camera shape of Meet is clear. It has been since day one for me.
- I do mix up Drive and Calendar icons a lot; I think they are really too similar.
- It's true that Pass icon could be for anything, but since it's the only one like this, I recognise it easily.
- I think Authenticator's icon is great; it's like the designers dared do something new in the Proton paradigm, and it works well for me.
- Docs and Sheets are pretty, but they really don't seem to belong here; it says something like "we copy pasted an open source project in our secured realm, and we also took their icon".
- I've always seen the "functional message" of the VPN icon, but it's probably because I knew the first one from which it's derived; Newcomers will indeed probably miss it.
- I don't know whether it aligns with what OP says, but I would find value in keeping more or less the same icon set (modulo the above points), but increasing the visibility of each app's distinct colour in its icon (saying "this is app X"), and decreasing the original Proton violet to some discreet outlining or subtle reminder (adding "by the way, this is Proton --therefore secure)". I think around 70% distinct colour and 30% violet would do the job.
- Since day one, I've asked myself about Lumo's icon: "why?". Having a cat is fine for me, but why flat with such a saturated unique colour? At first, Lumo was really bad and that icon could convey some "work-in-progress" message. But now, Lumo is great and a "proud" icon should boast it. Maybe a translucent "holographic" cat would do, I don't know...