John
My feedback
17 results found
-
2,083 votes
John supported this idea ·
-
2,059 votes
John supported this idea ·
-
25 votes
John supported this idea ·
-
1,271 votes
-
112 votes
John supported this idea ·
-
1,082 votes
John supported this idea ·
-
891 votes
John supported this idea ·
-
1,488 votes
John supported this idea ·
-
145 votes
John supported this idea ·
-
3,168 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment John supported this idea ·
-
1,547 votes
John supported this idea ·
-
896 votes
John supported this idea ·
-
1,485 votes
John supported this idea ·
-
2,733 votes
John supported this idea ·
An error occurred while saving the comment John commented
To all the people talking about how happy they are with todoist: if you are sincere commenters (and not just trollers or advertisers), I think you're totally missing Proton's point. Proton doesn't intend to and is not expected to provide a better ToDo, email or calendar app. They intend/are expected to provide good apps that ENCRYPT USER DATA (client-side). Since Todoist doesn't do so, a Proton ToDo would not be a competitor since it would just bring something that many value while Todoist doesn't even try to do it.
-
240 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment John commented
Rejoyce, F (below comparing with Google Calendar) and OP, as this feature clearly exists, at least in the web app and the Android app.
-
4,342 votes
John supported this idea ·
-
499 votes
Sharing a calendar is available on Web.
On next iterations we would like to enable the editing permission on mobile apps and add in the future to only share the "busy" information
John supported this idea ·
Or Proton could at least act like a "contact provider" in the accounts category, to let any contact app fetch (decrypted) contacts from it.