Joram Ulmke
My feedback
49 results found
-
5,084 votesJoram Ulmke supported this idea ·
-
144 votesJoram Ulmke supported this idea ·
-
569 votesJoram Ulmke supported this idea ·
-
1,155 votesJoram Ulmke supported this idea ·
-
1,499 votesJoram Ulmke supported this idea ·
-
1,852 votesJoram Ulmke supported this idea ·
-
727 votesJoram Ulmke supported this idea ·
-
111 votesJoram Ulmke supported this idea ·
-
81 votesJoram Ulmke supported this idea ·
-
477 votesJoram Ulmke supported this idea ·
-
103 votesJoram Ulmke supported this idea ·
-
30 votesJoram Ulmke supported this idea ·
-
38 votesJoram Ulmke supported this idea ·
-
404 votesJoram Ulmke supported this idea ·
-
3,729 votes
We have given this quite a bit of thought, but at the present moment, it is not clear the advantages would outweigh the disadvantages.
The biggest problem is search. Encrypting all metadata would break metadata search entirely on the web client as there is still no efficient way to handle search of encrypted data within a browser.
Secondly, metadata encryption’s value from a privacy standpoint is also somewhat dubious. Because we ultimately must deliver the message to the recipient, we must know who the recipient is. At the current time, there still isn’t any proven and viable way to work around this.
Metadata encryption is an area of continued research for us, and when the opportunity arises and the technology for doing this matures, we will definitely implement it in ProtonMail.
Joram Ulmke supported this idea · -
301 votesJoram Ulmke supported this idea ·
-
2,817 votesJoram Ulmke supported this idea ·
-
202 votesJoram Ulmke supported this idea ·
-
309 votesJoram Ulmke supported this idea ·
-
1,175 votesJoram Ulmke supported this idea ·